The Sam Taylor story in the Herald was disgusting.  Thanks for covering this.

Holy cow!  I didn’t read any of this stuff in the hokey, slanderous story by Bellinghams’s knave reporter at the toy newspaper.  No wonder newspapers are going down!

But golly, if University administrators are “diverting”(isn’t that stealing?)money from students in that department, isn’t it fair to assume that other departments have caught on, or been so directed, by now?  That would be many, many more figures than Professor Mill’s settlement. It’s amazing how every petty crook makes the paper, but reporters won’t even look at white shirts and ties. Paul’s reporting once again shows that if justice were ever served in this town, there could be quite a few very nice jobs available!

My first reaction was, “wow, how unfair and unjust the university has been, to retaliate over financial whistle blowing.”  So I decided to look into it.  What I found is completely different.  Decide for yourself, by reading the court decision.  It appears to deal with harassment and offensive conduct.

http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/62402-4.pub.doc.pdf

Anyone remember the Kurosawa film “Rashomon” staring the young Toshiro Mifune?

Actually, much of the “harassment and offensive conduct” may not be true and may be lies by Western Washington University administrators.  That is why this issue is important and requires full public process.  The Appeals court simply repeated allegations that came out of the illegal and secret hearing.  A public hearing with evidence, witnesses and testimony may destroy many of these stories.  That is what we need. 

A prodding form of teaching has always been accepted in academia as well as by Americans in general.  The movie “The Paper Chase” should be familiar to some.  For others, the popular TV series ‘Hell’s Kitchen’ with celebrity cook Gordon Ramsay is an extreme example.

I’ve known Perry Mills for 30 years.  He has always had a sharp tongue.  Yet WWU chose to tenure him in 1994 and make him a full professor in 1999.  They knew he used a rough teaching style.

When Perry exposed illegal activities by administrators at Western in 2003, the full force of then President Karen Morse’s administration came down on him.  A cavalier disregard for state laws is now a fact established by the State Court of Appeals.  Others who have followed this issue say that WWU administrators engaged in falsifying charges and creating evidence.  Only a full public hearing can address these issues.

Of interest is how Whatcom Superior Court Judge Mura played along with the University, giving their illegal processes his approval.  The Appeals Court reversed him.  He went over the line by putting into the record unsubstantiated charges against Perry - and these are what the Appeals Court mistakenly copied.  This tale is full of abuses by public officials - all to protect other public officials.

Let us not jump to judgement until a legal public process has taken place - if it ever will.  What this case needs is an investigative writer who can delve into the files and interview the students who are now long gone from WWU.  Perhaps theirs is the testimony that WWU did not want presented in an open hearing.

And it would be nice to investigate the stealing of student fees by administrators at WWU - the illegal activity that Perry originally exposed.  To date the University and our local prosecutor have protected the employees.

Michael got it right—- except there never was a legal and valid finding of fact and some of the incidents cited by the appeals court were shown to never have happened at the university’s own secret hearing.  Get that?  Never happened.

Those false accusations are in the ruling because they were re-introduced in pleadings and argument, not because that’s what the faculty panel found to be the case.

Whatcom Superior Court Judge Steven Mura was so befuddled by the mudslinging that he though he was dealing with a sexual harassment case.  Sex never came up in the charges or at the hearing.  Mura also went through back-flips to deny that the funds diversion constituted embezzlement. 

Mura made plenty of errors, but the one that counted was his refusal to read the plain text of the Administrative Procedures Act.  It says quite clearly that closed hearings are illegal and illegal procedures of any kind are nullified. 

Mura found the procedure illegal, but the results valid.  That’s the nub of the appeal ruling.  Mura misapplied the law and created a wrong.

The appeals court’s remedy was exactly what Mills asked Mura for: set aside the university’s suspension by nullifying Western’s kangaroo court.  In addition, Mills has been awarded his attorney’s fees for repairing Mura’s error.

It’s very Alice-in-Wonderland.  Just pray God it never happens to you.

Institutions are fairly predictable organizations. When threatened with embarrassment or censure, they often compound small crimes into larger ones.

Now that the tide has turned against the university administrators on the Professor Mills scandal, those small crimes that catalyzed the cover-up now risk a higher level of exposure (and remedy) than they would have had they been addressed appropriately at the outset. As Mills’ attorney refuels on the proceeds from their felonious conduct, the pressure inside the administration on those with knowledge of illicit activity may even generate juicy leaks.

Any perjuries against Mills that were previously contained by the secret hearings will eventually be drawn out by the legal process, where those who were willing to bear false witness under apparent immunity, will find that perceived protection fleeting. Any officials implicated in suborning perjury may soon wish they were elsewhere.

Today’s Cascadia Weekly has a more thorough report on this Perry Mills vs Western issue.  Paul de Armond contributed substantially to the article written by Tim Johnson. 

Savaged by Sheep - June 3,  2009 Cascadia Weekly