Its been almost three years since the private dormitory complex called CityView was presented to the Puget Neighborhood. Recently, the developer, Morgan Bartlett, (dba* Madrona Bay Real Estate Investments, LLC) has received conditional approval of his plans for a 106 bed apartment complex. It has been designed expressly to house 318 students in three bedroom/three bath apartments. Bedrooms are to be rented by separate leases. In a 39 page decision from the city's planning department, Bartlett was given approval, but it is weighted with conditions. Pages 31 to 38 of the approval document spell out those conditions, but I will leave it to the reader to parse them. Warning: It is seven dull pages of a true soporific. (I mean no offense to its authors however, whose job is to write such officialese.)  

The public has 14 days to appeal this decision, which is a ridiculous and risible amount of time given the complexities. Just a glance at the entirety of the documentation behind this project would bring on heart failure in the sturdiest of attorneys (in the link, scroll down to the notice). Public comment was very robust and its effects can be seen in some portions of the conditional approval. Unfortunately, robust citizen comments did not result in project disapproval.     

PDP2019-0015 DR2019-0036 CAP2019-0037 SEP2019-0039 4413 Consolidation Ave 

Neighborhood(s) Puget 

Project Number(s) PDP2019-0015 DR2019-0036 CAP2019-0037 SEP2019-0039

Project Street 4413 Consolidation Ave

Enclosures

    FINAL CityView Consolidated Permit 4 19 2022.pdf

    Attachment A - Application materials.pdf

    Attachment A.1 - CityView Site Plan - amended 9-30-21.pdf

    Attachment A.2 - Preliminary Bld Ele Floor Plans.pdf

    Attachment A.3 - Height Limitation Area.pdf

    Attachment B _SEP2019-0039 FINAL MDNS for Issuance 2-9-2022.pdf

    Attachment B _SEP2019-0039-FINAL-SEPA-Report-for-CityView-MDNS-2-8-2022.pdf

    Attachment B Ex. A SEPA Checklist 2021 03 15.pdf

    Attachment B Ex. A.1 CityView Critical Areas Report.pdf

    Attachment B Ex. A.10 Updated CityView Preliminary Engineering 3-4-21.pdf

    Attachment B Ex. A.11 Project Engineer RFI response 3-4-21.pdf

    Attachment B Ex. A.12 Parking Demand Analysis (NunesUeno, September 2021).pdf

    Attachment B Ex. A.13 TIA (transpo, January 2020).pdf

    Attachment B Ex. A.2 Critical Areas Mitigation Plan 1-8-20.pdf

    Attachment B Ex. A.3 Geotechnical Engineering Report 3-8-21.pdf

    Attachment B Ex. A.4 Preliminary Storm Report Revised March 2021.pdf

    Attachment B Ex. A.5 Tree Retention Plan CityView Revised 1-25-21.pdf

    Attachment B Ex. A.6 Tree Retention Plan Map 3-4-21.pdf

    Attachment B Ex. A.7 Landscape Plan Buffer 3-4-21.pdf

    Attachment B Ex. A.8 Landscape Plan with Lighting Plan 3-4-21.pdf

    Attachment B Ex. A.9 CityView Grading Plans with Trail Plan 3-4-21.pdf

    Attachment B Ex. B - PDP2019-0015 - 8 10 2019 NOIA.pdf

    Attachment B Ex. C PDP2019-0015- Complete App 3-9-2020.pdf

    Attachment B Ex. D PDP2019-0015 - Type I and II N O App 4 24 2020.pdf

    Attachment B Ex. E Public Comments.pdf

    Attachment B Ex. F PDP2019-0015 - 7 6 2020 RFI Final.pdf

    Attachment B Ex. G 3 12 2021 Response to Public Comment.pdf

    Attachment B Ex. H PC recommendation 2021-06-03.pdf

    Attachment B Ex. I PDP2019-0015 - 6 24 2021 RFI Final w Atts.pdf

    Attachment B Ex. J CityView Site Plan - amended 9-30-21.pdf

    Attachment C - Zoning and Land Use.pdf

    Attachment D - Cedar Ridge Preliminary Plat Approval Res 19-94.pdf

    Attachment E - Cedar Ridge Div 2 Final Plat Res 2002-24.pdf

    Attachment F - Cedar Ridge Division 2 Final Plat.PDF

    Attachment G - Time Extensions Nov Dec 2019.pdf

    Attachment H - TIme Extension October 2020.pdf

    Attachment I - Planning Commission Public Meeting.pdf

    Attachment J - Public Comment RE SEPA MDNS.pdf

    Attachment J.1 Public Comment received after Feb 23, 2022.pdf

    Attachment K - Density Bonus Request, May 11, 2020.pdf 

Just to be clear and explicit: to merely FILE an appeal requires a non-reimbursable $1,500 payment, upon which citizens can then procure an attorney for 500 smackers an hour. How is that for government “for the people”? A small neighborhood working group of Puget and Samish residents will meet to discuss possible action given the time line available. Rest assured, I will keep you updated.

*doing business as