Wise Owl Knows What to Do

Permalink +

Tue, Jan 29, 2013, 5:25 pm  //  Guest writer

Guest writer Bill Geyer used a literary tool to explain TDRs.  Update:  The opponents website is now posted.  It is worth checking.  

“Think, think, think.  What to do, Christopher Robin,” pondered Winnie the Pooh.  “The  82 acre woods are vast, much to be protected, much to be valued, yet so much debt -- $3,200,000 – oh, bother.  That’s more than all the honey pots we can gather.  EeeOr says it’s a crisis.  He says we must pick new commissioners of the woods, tax the villagers, and then give the villagers’ money to the City.  If we do this for ten years, he says we can stay in the woods.  I’ve been thinking, Christopher, isn’t there a better way?  Wise Owl says we shouldn’t take the villagers hard earned pay.  He says we don’t need new commissioners.” 

“Did I hear my name?” asked Wise Owl as he flew in.   

“How nice to see you, Wise Owl,” said Christopher Robin.  “Tell us how to save the woods AND make this better.”   

“It’s quite simple,” Wise Owl replied. “We sell the rights to build homes in the 82 acre woods to other areas where there are no woods.  You see, no one is talking outside the woods, Christopher Robin.”

“Do you mean,” Christopher Robin said as he scratched his head, “that we wouldn’t have any houses in the woods, wouldn’t cut the trees or make it into a tidy little village, but it would stay for all the creatures forever and not cost the villagers a cent?”

“Who, I mean yes,” said Wise Owl.

“But how does it work?” asked Christopher Robin.

‘Well,” said Wise Owl, “you must think smart.  You must first understand the woods are more than just land, streams, ponds and critters.  And they must be protected.  But the woods have something almost as valuable as all these things, much more valuable than all the honey pots, and enough to pay the City’s entire loan.”

“More than all the honey pots?” exclaimed Pooh Bear.

“You mean it would pay off the three million dollar loan?” asked Christopher Robin.

“Yes.  If we think smart and are patient,” said Wise Owl.

“What does patience have to do with it?” asked Christopher Robin.

“Everything, my boy, everything.  Let’s say we gather the finest thinkers in the village and plan with patience and intelligence – we will open the door for better answers. The loan isn’t due for five years – which gives plenty of time to sell the TDRs.”

“No more loan, no houses where animals should live, no money taken from the villagers - why Wise Owl, you have something here!” exclaimed Christopher Robin. 

“And keep the honey pots?” asked Pooh.

“We can keep the honey pots,” said Wise Owl.

Christopher Robin wanted to know more.  “Please tell me Wise Owl, exactly how would we do this?”

Wise Owl swiveled his head and stretched his wings to reveal a document.  It was a short page which described the woods, listed the Council’s names, and included another item called “development rights.”

“Here is the valuable item,” Wise Owl declared.  “The 82 acre woods have development rights to supply 714 single family or 1190 multi-family dwellings.  The rights to build these dwellings can be sold as a transfer of development rights (TDR’s) to a village location.  The price for each TDR is around $2,500 each, so selling them now would generate about one and a half million dollars.  But with patience over the next four years the rights could be sold in a better market, and might be worth from three to five thousand dollars each, or even more.” 

Christopher Robin quickly calculated the total and excitedly exclaimed “Pooh, that’s three and a half to five million dollars --enough to pay off the whole loan, and maybe more!” 

“Oh wouldn’t that be a wonderful Christmas present?” Pooh Bear said as he reached for his hanky.

“Now finally the question arises.  Who?” said Wise Owl. “Who can put this together?”

Christopher Robin thought long and hard.  “I really know the villagers want to help, and some of them know how to do this, don’t they?  We can ask them.”

“Yes, we can ask them.  But first the villagers must say no,” said Wise Owl.

“What do you mean?” asked Christopher Robin.

Wise Owl explained, “The villagers will vote whether or not to create a new park district and elect commissioners.  Funny even if the villagers do that, they have no say in setting the tax rate or where the money is spent.  Only the commissioners can do that.  So it’s very important, Christopher Robin, that the villagers say no.  They must Vote NO on Proposition 1 and mail their ballots by February 12, 2013 to the County Auditor.  Once a majority votes NO, we then can ask the City Council to sell the TDR’s.”

“And we can have a picnic in the woods?” Pooh asked expectantly.

“Most certainly,” said Christopher Robins, “we can have many picnics in the woods.”

“I like picnics, too,” cried EeeOr who was grazing nearby.      

Think, think, think. Smart thinking can pay off the loan.  A new parks district is not needed. 
VOTE NO on Proposition 1.  Then let’s propose a smarter solution. 

------------------

Bill Geyer, a 28-year South Hill resident, is a certified professional planner.  He serves as the Chairman of Protect Bellingham Parks, the committee advocating realistic financial solutions to pay off the City’s $3,200,000 loan to the Greenways Endowment Fund.

Dan Pike  //  Tue, Jan 29, 2013, 5:45 pm

With all due respect to the author, Winnie-the-Pooh would understand that the honeypot you have is the one that matters.  Tricksters are always at the ready to try and get you to give up your honey—er, solution, and promise a better, grander one, if only you give up the one you have before you.  The funny thing is, when I identify the voices advocating that we ‘save’ the forest another way, many are the same voices that advocated to let the forest be developed at multiple points in the past, including at the time the City entered into its purchase agreement in 2011. 

Don’t fall for the bait-and-switch, no matter how cute the story: the proposed park district is a reasonable, effective, and fair solution to the problem.  Don’t allow folks who were against saving the park at all hijack the process now and undue all that the community has accomplished.


John Servais  //  Tue, Jan 29, 2013, 5:56 pm

Well, Dan, do you care to say that I am a past voice for development?  No, I didn’t think so.  And yet, I am very much against this issue.  It is amazing to me to watch my so called liberal friends take such a low road of personal attacks in their effort to pass this ballot measure.  Indeed, it is rather astounding for me to read you saying such things about another.


Dan Pike  //  Tue, Jan 29, 2013, 6:18 pm

John, I would note that you are a complicated man, as are about 50% of us; the others are complicated women.  Bill Geyer, the author of the piece, has certainly been a voice for development of the parcel in the past, which was my point.  I’m sorry if you were offended by my language against Bill; I thought it was pretty bland—certainly more so than some inaccurate characterizations you’ve made against me in the past.

I doubt I’ve seriously wounded Bill; I’ve always appreciated his attitude in the public arena, even though I’ve more often than not disagreed with his perspectives—although I’ve also advocated for considering his perspectives inside City Hall, once upon a time.

In this instance, I am reminded of the saying, “Don’t lose the good in pursuit of the perfect.” I’m also aware that there are those among us who would use the desire for a perfect solution to keep the good from getting accomplished.  When the Council nearly unanimously stated they would not even consider including this in a future greenways levy, that shuts off one of the avenues opponents advocate.  When TDRs have been a consistent bust, both here and elsewhere, suggesting that in this instance we’ll suddenly find a magical solution to making them work, well, I guess I’d rather go with what I know does work—a limited term pay back through a park district taxing mechanism.

And I’m still confused what I said that you found so offensive.  I’ve read many, many articles on your site that seemed to be intentionally aimed at insult, but left without editorial comment.  I count many of the opponents to this proposal amongst my friends, and we have good discussions about why our perspectives are right or the others’ are wrong. The value of your blog is that it seems to be a place for such discussions to take place more broadly.  However, if you find my comentary insulting, I guess I can stop commenting.


John Servais  //  Tue, Jan 29, 2013, 6:48 pm

Dan, I was very critical of you while you ran for a second term as mayor.  And it ceased the day the election was over.  I was a very strong supporter of you for your first term, as you well know.  Your actions in that first term turned me to look for a new mayor. 

I called you out because of your having held high office - and should have a better take on issues.

You refer to Bill as a “trickster” and suggest he is practicing “bait and switch”.  Your patronizing me, saying I’m complicated.  We have an issue before us and I have provided a forum for debate on the issues.  It has been sad to watch the stream of personal attacks coming from the proponents.  Bill Geyer is not running for office.  He has provided perspective on an issue.  It would be nice for you and others to provide such instead of doing personality analysis.


Bill Geyer  //  Tue, Jan 29, 2013, 9:32 pm

Dan, thanks for commenting, but your dialogue invokes identity politics to minimize the proposed solution.  Using “tricksters” and diminishing the value of an opinion simply because someone advocated developing some of the site is a weak counterpoint.  Focusing on the financial reality is more informative for the voters.  Let’s review. 

City residents own the 82-acre Woods.  They paid for it with Greenways III funds.  The Council members have a fiduciary responsibility to responsibly manage the site.  When purchased in September 2011, you and the Council borrowed $3.2MM from the Greenways Endowment Fund to be repaid by December 2017.  The site is the collateral.  The site is currently zoned RM Planned which determines the number of dwelling units that could be built on the site.  The number of units drives an appraised value called the residual land value.  The more units that can be physically built on the site, the higher the value.  Reducing the number of units that can be built on the site reduces the value. 

The Council’s challenge (and their legal responsibility) is to determine the number of units that can be built (or not) on the site.  They are legally empowered to make this decision as the elected officials on behalf of the citizens.  The article above shows that if the Council decides no units should be built on the site, Council can still sell the units as TDR’s to another location.  This mechanism is successful across the country.  The market place determines the TDR value when there is a smooth TDR system.  With some code corrections by the Council, Bellingham could have a smooth TDR system. 

This is not “bait and switch”.  This is critical thinking about the City’s asset and the financial impact on taxpayers.  It is not politically motivated, but is based on sound, proven financial tools used by professionals in the field each day.  It is not identity politics, but is sound land management that the City should have performed prior to completing the purchase in August 2011.  Bellingham has four years to use this tool to repay the loan and save south Bellingham property owners from additional taxes.  That’s a lot cleaner and more efficient than creating a new unit of government, a metropolitan parks district.


Donald Duck  //  Tue, Jan 29, 2013, 10:17 pm

blah blah blah, tired of the talking heads and tired of the shell games. debt is debt, we can have it half paid before the experts are even done with their smoke and mirrors. or, they will do some stupendously stupid large ugly subdivision there, period. vote YES.


Wendy Harris  //  Wed, Jan 30, 2013, 12:45 am

Remember the TDR program for Lake Whatcom?  Me neither.  That is because the TDR program has not worked in Bellingham, or frankly, in most other places that have tried. 

Where is the proposed receiving site for the Chuckanut Ridge? After all, that is the hardest part of making a TDR program work. A working market requires that receiving areas face a demand for denser development than is currently allowed. And that demand exists in places like Silver Beach, which is the opposite direction of where we need to head. And a TDR program is complicated, particularly in a City where there is great resistance to infill and even infill proponents admit that the infill toolkit does not work and needs to be amended.

TDR programs are normally used when a municipality lacks the financial resources to purchase the property that it wishes to protect. But here, the park district proposal provides the source of funding.

Sorry Pooh Bear, but your ill-considered TDR proposal needs to retire to the woods.


Nicholas Zaferatos  //  Wed, Jan 30, 2013, 12:43 pm

I liked Bill’s story… the story suggests a very reasonable path forward.

It’s time to rethink our “free gifting” of increased property values every time the city rezones property. Wise Owl suggests looking at the TDR mechanism as a solution. Do they work? Of course they do. Throughout the nation they have served as a primary financing tool for thousands of acres of public lands acquisitions since the 1970s. Because they haven’t work in Whatcom County is not due to the tool, but rather, to the tool’s user.  Unwilling to demonstrate sound land use management practices in general, is it surprising the county’s TDR effort has failed as well?

Bill’s tale reintroduces the tool of TDRs as a solution for repaying the loan balance. We create increased property values every time we wave the rezoning wand. We did so for the 100 acre woods back in the 1970s when those marginal lands were first inappropriately rezoned for higher density development. Thus, creating higher value. Higher value that the city taxpayers paid last year. We continue to create higher property values throughout the city in areas deemed “appropriate” for higher urban densities (especially in “urban villages”). Property owners in those locations get a windfall. The philosophy behind TDRs is that when we grant increased development rights, or windfalls, we ought to recoup “something”.  That “something” could help pay for other public benefit - in this case – the 100 acre woods.

What’s needed is a city-wide system of property value exchange. TDRs can work and create a far more equitable financing solution for the community. Far more equitable than asking a portion of the citizenry to tax themselves for a property purchase that has already been inflated due to our own past zoning actions. The costly part in setting up a TDR program is, in fact, already in place – we already own the development rights that can be placed on the exchange market.

I really wish folks would stop bashing others’ opinions just because they engage, professionally, in the business of development. The author of the article has extensive knowledge about the mechanisms of public finance and public lands management, which he freely offers. Don’t trash his ideas just because he also participates as community builder. Instead, we should applaud the author, as a developer, for endorsing the idea of the community gaining an equitable return from future upzoning windfalls.


Tip Johnson  //  Wed, Jan 30, 2013, 1:26 pm

Thank you Nick, for your on-target comments.  And thanks for calling out the bad speech I am ashamed to witness from many of my friends.  Much of it is more painful than reading Herald blog comments, because on the Herald at least I don’t know the people making the idiotic or unfriendly remarks.  I am amazed at how intolerant district supporters are of any criticism or opposition.  Geez, folks, that’s politics.  We’re supposed to argue about these things, and if you think there is no legitimate opposing view on the issue, then you haven’t yet understood the issue.  Finally, I’ll just add that the tenor of many such remarks is the best argument against the district I have yet seen. With advertising like that, you don’t really need opponents.


Wendy Harris  //  Wed, Jan 30, 2013, 3:41 pm

John, Nick and Tip: I see nothing unusual about the tone of the comments for this issue, at least as reflected on NW Citizen.  The folks who support the park levy have been open and transparent about their agenda.  The opponents have been disingenuous and are being called out on this, as I agree they should. (I do support John’s efforts to reflect both positions on NW Citizen.)

The solutions suggested by opponents are intended to do one thing… allow more development (and if not on Chuckanut, then somewhere else.) They pretend this is about financial concerns, or park district transparency issues, or whatever hot button they can push… but it all comes down to a pro-development agenda. Everything else is an attempt to draw attention away from the pivotal issue: permanent protection of a natural resource of regional significance.

Come on, does anybody really think that a TDR program will work? TDR programs are complex, expensive and time consuming.  They require development of attractive receiving sites and sophisticated zoning laws.  It would take at least several years before the City would have something viable, if this is even possible. I want the City’s resources spent on important things like Lake Whatcom and the waterfront, not wasted on programs for which an identified funding source already exists.

The City does plenty for developers. It is time to do something for the people, the land and the wildlife. 


Steve Wilson  //  Wed, Jan 30, 2013, 4:34 pm

  O Wise Owl, I’m all for pursuing the TDR concept AFTER the Parks District is established.  I’m sure the citizens and commissioners would be happy to receive your dedicated service to reduce the levy burden, shorten the time frame of the levy and put this to bed once and for all.
  Unfortunately I’m not willing to take the chance of putting all my eggs in your infinitely wise basket in lieu of a Parks District.  I’m afraid you would get distracted in your busy life and forget to tend to those precious eggs.


Dan Pike  //  Wed, Jan 30, 2013, 5:10 pm

Steve’s got it right.  The problem with TDR’s in this community is that they compete with the County’s willingness to allow thousands of lots which were created unethically, at a minimum, in the 1990s to continue to compete in the market.  Because our County has thumbed its nose at the Growth Management Act for over two decades with no repercussions to the electeds who perpetuated the law-breaking, or to the developers, landowners, and other interests that twisted the electeds arms for special consideration at the expense of public good, there is little to no demand for TDRs in this community. 

In addition, there is a significant element of NIMBYism present within Bellingham that makes landing TDRs in any marketable area more challenging.  See, plenty of blame to go around for TDR failure; it’s a nonpartisan issue. 

So Steve is correct:  TDRs would be a welcome addition to solving the funding issue, but given that there have been efforts to craft a workable TDR policy in this community for over a decade, at least, with no real success suggests that relying on them as a primary means to solve a 3 million dollar problem in less than five years is unrealistic.  On the other hand, if your goal is to get folks to give up a real solution for a smoke-and-mirrors one that promises a better solution than the one in hand, yet never quite materializes so that what’s left are options like selling some significant parts of the property, well—let’s just say I guess I’m more cynical than some posting here are.


Donald Duck  //  Wed, Jan 30, 2013, 5:25 pm

Nick, this isn’t a classroom; Tip, the heated banter here is no different than other issues. Wendy thanks, thats the first time I ever agreed with you. In the real world, no way either TDR’s or another Greenways levy or some private capital campaign will ever fly; its either vote YES or the city will sell and develop. a. big. ole. ugly. subdivision.


Gerry Wilbour  //  Wed, Jan 30, 2013, 7:24 pm

Both before and after the City bought the property, advocates for it’s preservation spent considerable time looking into many ways to raise the money to pay off the loan.  All possible ideas were investigated, no stone was left unturned.  We didn’t begin this process intending to promote a Park District and allot of effort went into finding other solutions.  We were open and actively invited the input of anyone who would participate.  We met with neighborhood groups, city officials, the Mayor and Council. The CCFD idea didn’t float to the top of the list until it was clear that it was the only option that worked, even though we knew it would be a lengthy and difficult process.  I can say with confidence, we did our due diligence.  It maybe possible that some relatively small amounts of money can be raised by other means.  If this were to occur, the levy amount charged by the CCFD would be lowered and/or shortened.  That would be a good thing.

The City should make it’s zoning and density decisions based on the needs of areas and neighborhoods with significant public input.  If higher density is warranted in an area, it should be granted through zoning, not sold for a City profit.  Exploiting this option to raise money could lead to some very sketchy, perhaps illegal and controversial decisions. Sorry, making a public profit or covering a budgetary shortfall by selling density transfers of City owned property when it’s in a financial bind strikes me as horrible public policy.  Zoning and density should be a regulatory function, and not be distorted by a profit incentive.

I am confident, the CCFD will win and we will soon be able to celebrate and move onto a much needed community based stewardship of the property.

 


John Watts  //  Wed, Jan 30, 2013, 8:12 pm

For the record, TDRs can work, despite what the County does or doesn’t do. The City can make a TDR system work, but not automatically because it is a market-based system. Rezoning existing neighborhoods has been difficult politically, but string up the UGA for TDR-oriented zoning could work, providing the City gets serious about annexing small chunks at a time.
There is plenty of information available on this concept on the Internet, and I have published several blogs under that label on HamsterTalk.

The so-called ‘Chuckanut Ridge’ issue is a different story; it has been a problem in people’s minds for years since its mysterious up-zone during the time of Mt St Helen’s eruption in about 1981/82. Records on this specific transaction seem to be missing.
Local resistance to the enormous development proposal of several years ago was justified because the development scheme was unrealistic, largely based upon its underlying assumption of value. The reaction was swift from mostly Southside opponents, who ramped up rhetoric to levels that were also unrealistic. The ensuing kerfluffle not only stalled the project but created a rift in the community that persists to this day, as the current ‘issue’ demonstrates.

Suffice to say that the so-called ‘Responsible Development’ advocates did manage to create enough controversy to nearly prevent the Greenways III levy from ever being voted upon. Yes, the proponents of saving ALL the 100-acres Wood were willing to hijack a popular City-wide GW3 vote to get their way! Thankfully, that did not happen, but here we are again, faced with an intractable bloc of emotionally willful people who will do most anything to achieve their avowed wish, regardless of costs to the community as a whole. Sad, but true.

Many HamsterTalk blogs were dedicated to this one issue under the Greenways label.
Fortunately, GW3 passed, which allowed a later Council -with the encouragement of our [deservedly] 1-term Mayor Pike- to spend $3.2 million MORE than what was intended for any CR acquisitions. That brings us to the current situation.

While I don’t live in one of the Southside neighborhoods that will be voting on the Metro Parks District issue, I would not vote for it if I did. The reasons closely parallel the arguments raised by John Servais, and by Tim Johnson of Cascadia Weekly.
It is legal option, but it does set a silly precedent for an entire City that has repeatedly evidenced its strong support for the great Greenways program that benefits us all.

The Greenways system that has been in place prior to 2006 worked just fine, despite any perceived imperfections; the GAC did its work well and duly advised the City Council of its recommendations. Because of the nature of property and funding availability, every wish-list item could not be acted upon to everyone’s satisfaction; and this proved inconvenient for certain CR advocates, including 4 members of the Council who illegally made a ‘promise’ to purchase ALL of Chuckanut Ridge, not just part of it.

Council members Barbara Ryan, Terry Bornemann, Gene Knutson and Joan Beardsley made a pact among themselves supporting that ‘promise’. Councilmember Beardsley has since passed away and Ryan has retired from office, but Knutson and Bornemann remain from the original group of conspirators. Their most likely current allies might be Councilmembers Lilliquist and Fleetwood. Remember, all it takes is 4 Council votes to act on property acquisitions, despite what Greenways recommends. Lilliquist has already tried to derail the Mayor Linville’s idea of putting about 25 acres of CR up for sale to pay down the $3.2 million ‘loan’.

But, selling about 25 acres is the ideal solution, despite what opponents may claim.
Think about it; not all of CR is wetlands and ‘pristine’ woods likely to be inhabited by Pooh Bear! There are already existing homes adjacent to CR, including the residences of some of the most ardent -and NIMBY- supporters of the special Parks District Plan.

BTW, former Mayor Pike’s rationale on the above is misguided, at best. A better definition is ‘seriously flawed’.
My 2cents.


Shane Roth  //  Mon, Feb 04, 2013, 11:25 pm

I take principled exception to spelling Eeyore’s name wrong.


Mike Rostron  //  Tue, Feb 05, 2013, 9:16 pm

I do not live on the south side and so cannot vote, but I will still use the park occasionally, and I am happy to see folks have come up with a solution to funding it that does not require selling any of the land for development.  Moreover, every wooded acre saved from development in Bellingham is a kind of victory.  Ours is the most rural of mid-sized cities - let’s keep it that way!  It is something to be proud of.  More parks - less development is a praiseworthy goal.  We should strive to get a reputation as the least friendly city in Washington to developers.  It will not be the developers who pay the costs of the increased infrastructure, traffic, and necessary improvements to city services capacity that rapid population growth continues to make necessary.

Bake sales and benefit concerts have more chance of raising the 3 million than TDAs do! 

Wendy is right - the city already does plenty to help developers, and the citizens are always left to pay for the messes they leave behind.  What Bellingham needs is not more development - green or otherwise, but a rest from the rapid growth of the last decade - some time to put her house in order, and to face up to the reality that many residents, perhaps even a majority,  would prefer we started having a real dialog about ways to slow growth, not encourage it.

 


Redistricting: Democrats may have upper hand

Republicans and Democrats traded barbs on the first day of the Districting Committee, but Dems may have won the first battle.

Ralph Schwartz
Tue, Feb 09, 2016, 4:02 am
5 comments; last on Feb 10, 2016

Stop the Rental Fires Now!

Inspections of rentals cannot begin too soon. Seven fires in rental units since 2011 and almost half with ONE landlord. No but the clock may be running out.

Dick Conoboy
Mon, Feb 08, 2016, 5:26 am
0 comments


Super Bowl 50 - Wretched Excess

From all the monumentally boring hoopla to the shameful rousting of the homeless Super Bowl 50 exceeds all expectations for greed and excess.

Dick Conoboy
Fri, Feb 05, 2016, 11:45 am
3 comments; last on Feb 08, 2016

Harriet Spanel has passed on

Harriet Spanel was many years our representative in the state legislature and served Whatcom County and Bellingham very well.

John Servais
Wed, Feb 03, 2016, 4:49 pm
4 comments; last on Feb 04, 2016

Mayor Picks Lisa Anderson for City Planning Commission

Lisa Anderson will fill the remaining term of real estate broker, Cerise Noah. who left the Bellingham Planning Commission several months ago.

Dick Conoboy
Wed, Feb 03, 2016, 1:53 pm
0 comments

In White Skin

Talib Kweli played the Wild Buffalo a couple evenings ago and Ralph Schwartz was there. He writes a very personal take on the evening.

Ralph Schwartz
Mon, Feb 01, 2016, 3:00 am
2 comments; last on Feb 04, 2016

Say Nein to Uber

Uber has started a new type of public taxi service in many cities, including Bellingham. It is controversial.

Dick Conoboy
Sun, Jan 31, 2016, 11:04 am
3 comments; last on Feb 04, 2016

WA State Minimum Wage Initiative - A Race To The Bottom

Raising the minimum wage to $13.50/hr by 2020 cements workers into permanent slave wages that cannot pay the bills.

Dick Conoboy
Mon, Jan 18, 2016, 5:35 am
1 comments; last on Jan 20, 2016

Eagles on the Nooksack

They are less famous than the eagles on the Skagit but closer to Bellingham, fewer people and still lots of eagles. A great January afternoon outing.

John Servais
Mon, Jan 11, 2016, 11:18 pm
1 comments; last on Jan 13, 2016

Earthquake lightly shakes Bellingham

Earthquake near San Juan Island felt in Bellingham late Tuesday night

John Servais
Wed, Dec 30, 2015, 12:15 am
0 comments

Kremen & Weimer tell us of Clinton & Sanders

What the campaign styles of local politicians Pete Kremen and Carl Weimer tell us about presidential candidates Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders

Whatcom Citizen
Tue, Dec 29, 2015, 11:06 am
4 comments; last on Dec 31, 2015

Bye Bye

Shell Polar Pioneer floating oil drill rig left the Pacific Northwest for Norway today. Nice holiday gift for all of us.

John Servais
Fri, Dec 25, 2015, 10:31 am
2 comments; last on Dec 25, 2015

Unregulated vacation rentals on Lake Whatcom

Tani Sutley writes on the continuing issue of houses in residential zones that are used essentially as hotels and disrupt quiet neighborhoods.

Guest writer
Mon, Dec 21, 2015, 2:14 am
0 comments

Whatcom Farmers and Eric Hirst Dialog

Statement by Whatcom Family Farmers on “Eric Hirst and his water ideas” and Hirst's Reply

Guest writer
Sat, Dec 19, 2015, 11:11 am
1 comments; last on Dec 20, 2015

Request for Citizen Evidence

Wherein inquiring minds just want to know!

Tip Johnson
Mon, Dec 14, 2015, 3:58 pm
0 comments

PDC - The Missing Documents

Wherof we cannot speak, thereof we must be silent?

Tip Johnson
Wed, Dec 02, 2015, 8:31 pm
3 comments; last on Dec 06, 2015

Planning Commission Opening Calls for Neighborhood Rep

The Planning Commission has a vacancy. Now is the time for the appointment of a member who represents the interests of the neighborhoods.

Dick Conoboy
Mon, Nov 30, 2015, 5:29 am
0 comments

Update on Lincoln Street Student Housing Project

The student housing project for 648 individuals called NXNW (North by Northwest) on Lincoln Street is moving forward briskly. This is an update.

Dick Conoboy
Mon, Nov 23, 2015, 5:41 am
7 comments; last on Dec 27, 2015

Tax incentives proposed for Fairhaven apartments - Updated

Council to allow three weeks for written comments on tax exemption proposal for high density buildings in quiet Fairhaven neighborhood

John Servais
Mon, Nov 16, 2015, 10:41 pm
9 comments; last on Nov 19, 2015

Accessory Dwelling Units - There Is No Rush

There is no reason to rush an updated ordinance on ADUs when we do not even know what the current number is or where existing illegal units are…

Dick Conoboy
Mon, Nov 16, 2015, 4:30 am
9 comments; last on Dec 10, 2015

Bellingham Updating Accessory Dwelling Laws

By Shannon Maris. Detached ADUs - the 'mother in law' mini cottages - are being considered by the city of Bellingham. This impacts every home owner.

Guest writer
Sat, Nov 14, 2015, 5:33 pm
3 comments; last on Nov 19, 2015

Veterans Day and Thanking Veterans

Some personal thoughts on thanking our veterans for their service

Dick Conoboy
Wed, Nov 11, 2015, 4:23 am
1 comments; last on Nov 11, 2015

Whatcom Co.: Voting and Vote-Counting with Integrity

An overview of Whatcom County's method of processing ballots and counting votes.

Guest writer
Sun, Nov 08, 2015, 9:25 pm
3 comments; last on Dec 29, 2015

Final Election Returns: Jail Tax Rejected

Satpal Sidhu wins council seat. Virtually all the ballots are now counted. Challenges and a few special are left.

John Servais
Fri, Nov 06, 2015, 4:37 pm
1 comments; last on Nov 07, 2015

Thursday Voting Update

Jail sales tax is being rejected - and the NO vote is increasing. Sidhu - Kerschner still undecided. Props 2, 3, 9 and 10 all should pass.

John Servais
Thu, Nov 05, 2015, 9:17 pm
1 comments; last on Nov 06, 2015

Wednesday Vote Changes

Second tally of 10,000 more ballots is in. Jail sales tax is now being rejected. Probably 15,000 or more ballots to go.

John Servais
Wed, Nov 04, 2015, 6:45 pm
2 comments; last on Nov 05, 2015

Important Election Issues Undecided

The first returns - probably 60% of the final vote - shows contradictory propositions passing and most candidate races decided.

John Servais
Wed, Nov 04, 2015, 12:05 am
7 comments; last on Nov 04, 2015

Growing Veterans

Growing Veterans was created to empower military veterans to grow food, communities, and each other.

Dick Conoboy
Mon, Nov 02, 2015, 8:04 am
2 comments; last on Nov 04, 2015

More on Propositions 1 and 9

Where more substantial evidence is presented against proposition 9 - and why you should vote REJECTED on it.

John Servais
Sun, Nov 01, 2015, 9:31 am
24 comments; last on Nov 04, 2015

NWCitizen Publisher’s Voting Choices

As an independent citizen and political junkie, here is how I am voting - with brief reasons for my choices.

John Servais
Sat, Oct 31, 2015, 2:02 am
8 comments; last on Nov 03, 2015

NAMI Whatcom Opposes Prop 2015-1

The latest addition and the issue in review

Tip Johnson
Tue, Oct 27, 2015, 6:56 pm
0 comments

Dwindling Information Makes Voters Susceptible to Spin

A perspective on the our changing news system, the consequences, and the challenges for the future. With a suggestion of the solution.

Whatcom Citizen
Mon, Oct 26, 2015, 11:39 pm
5 comments; last on Oct 28, 2015

Info Slowmo

When they feel you just don't need to know

Tip Johnson
Mon, Oct 26, 2015, 3:32 pm
4 comments; last on Oct 28, 2015

The Mysterious State of the Whatcom County Jail

Wherein the operative information is $$$ECRET

Tip Johnson
Mon, Oct 26, 2015, 1:57 pm
3 comments; last on Oct 29, 2015

Effort to Stop Bakken Oil Trains

Whatcom group plans meeting workshop to submit comments to Washington Dept of Ecology against Skagit/Bakken oil trains.

John Servais
Sat, Oct 24, 2015, 1:26 pm
6 comments; last on Oct 26, 2015

Fairhaven Pharmacy Closes Today - For Real

After 126 years in business, Fairhaven Pharmacy closes for the last time at 6 p.m. today. Historic Fairhaven Association to do Halloween photos.

John Servais
Tue, Oct 20, 2015, 2:53 pm
1 comments; last on Oct 21, 2015

Louws Regrets Jail Mailer

County Executive - and candidate for reelection -Jack Louws has written county officials with his regrets over jail mailer.

John Servais
Tue, Oct 20, 2015, 9:25 am
8 comments; last on Oct 24, 2015

Let’s not squander the next 30 years

The jail sales tax proposition is a road to perdition for our county. It is a waste and has been deceptively promoted.

John Servais
Sun, Oct 18, 2015, 11:37 am
4 comments; last on Oct 20, 2015

Making a Jail: Bamboozle!

With a smarmy October Surprise

Tip Johnson
Fri, Oct 16, 2015, 4:52 pm
9 comments; last on Oct 19, 2015

Court: No Radio Towers in Point Roberts

A Canadian radio station is trying to install huge radio towers in Point Roberts for a Canadian audience. Citizen movement has fought them.

John Lesow
Thu, Oct 08, 2015, 7:14 am
0 comments

James King Resigns as Bellingham Parks Director

James King to return to Alaska and take job with U.S. Forest Service. Mayor will appoint a new parks director.

John Servais
Sat, Oct 03, 2015, 2:47 pm
1 comments; last on Oct 04, 2015

Just Say No - to the Incarceration-Industrial Complex

The "... new jail just doesn't pencil out", writes a well qualified accountant. A look at the future costs of the proposed jail.

David Camp
Fri, Oct 02, 2015, 10:48 am
11 comments; last on Oct 09, 2015

Alternative Jail Proposal for City Center

There is a good alternative for a decent jail - but we first must vote down the jail sales tax proposal in November.

John Servais
Tue, Sep 22, 2015, 4:54 pm
5 comments; last on Sep 25, 2015

Wendy DeFreest is Opening a ‘Burger Joint’

Wendy DeFreest, of Avenue Bread, will open a new "burger joint" called The Filling Station by late October in Fairhaven. It will not be a sandwich cafe.

John Servais
Sat, Sep 19, 2015, 3:37 pm
0 comments

That Louwsy Jail Deal

FEMA camp or new county seat?

Tip Johnson
Tue, Sep 15, 2015, 5:26 pm
13 comments; last on Oct 16, 2015

A Learning Moment - Hopefully

Beware walking RR tracks on the Fairhaven waterfront in the event of unexpected encounter with a high speed train

John Servais
Sun, Sep 13, 2015, 8:42 am
2 comments; last on Sep 18, 2015

Second Water Main Break on Donovan in a Year

Mains a' bursting - Avast!

Tip Johnson
Mon, Sep 07, 2015, 8:06 pm
0 comments

Homeowner to city: Please buy me out

Padden Creek daylighting project strays far from city promises to homeowner that his property would remain intact.

John Servais
Wed, Aug 26, 2015, 9:17 am
4 comments; last on Sep 05, 2015

How Our Community Can Welcome Our Troops Home

Christopher Brown guest writes how traditional communal warrior reintegration practices could help our returning combat veterans.

Guest writer
Mon, Aug 24, 2015, 4:11 am
0 comments

Black Lives Matter, Occupy WS & Whatcom Jail

A Whatcom Citizen writes of protest movements and how our proposed county mega jail is related to them.

Whatcom Citizen
Wed, Aug 19, 2015, 6:55 pm
15 comments; last on Sep 04, 2015

$15/hr Minimum Wage - Seriously?

Moves to set the minimum wage to $15, even if successful, are woefully insufficient. And why aren't people speaking out about abusive work scheduling?

Dick Conoboy
Wed, Aug 19, 2015, 4:00 am
2 comments; last on Sep 17, 2015

Local retired librarian injured by police

Bruce Radtke, a retired Bellingham librarian, reported to be assaulted by police for handing out leaflets

Guest writer
Mon, Aug 17, 2015, 11:17 pm
5 comments; last on Aug 27, 2015

Predictive Policing Comes to Bellingham

Is the tail wagging the dog? Edward Alexander guest writes on why predictive software for our police needs basic questions answered before purchase.

Guest writer
Sun, Aug 16, 2015, 2:39 pm
1 comments; last on Aug 22, 2015

Gunfight at Cornwall Park on Wednesday

Nothing in the Herald this morning, so NWCitizen is informing citizens of shootout at Cornwall Park.

John Servais
Thu, Aug 13, 2015, 10:29 am
1 comments; last on Aug 13, 2015

Whatcom Conservation District Elections

Barbara Perry has been researching the secretive election processes of the Whatcom Conservation District. Really secretive. Probably fraudulent.

Guest writer
Sun, Aug 09, 2015, 10:52 am
1 comments; last on Aug 12, 2015

Election Results - Aug 4 Primary

9:52 - final post for tonight. A running blog about the election results on this August evening. Feel free to comment.

John Servais
Tue, Aug 04, 2015, 7:09 pm
8 comments; last on Aug 06, 2015

The Hansen’s Giant Rental Megaplex - Part 2

While the city deals with permitting on the Hansen rental megaplexes, the council has asked for proposals from staff on design standards for historic areas.

Dick Conoboy
Tue, Aug 04, 2015, 9:14 am
9 comments; last on Aug 08, 2015

Whatcom Co.: 90 Million Gallons of Water a Day

Eric Hirst provides us all with a well researched report on Whatcom County water issues - rights, Lake Whatcom, ground water and more.

Guest writer
Tue, Jul 21, 2015, 11:42 pm
10 comments; last on Aug 12, 2015

Electromagnetic Radiation: Who’s Looking Out for You?

The fight to keep Point Roberts from becoming a Radio Tower Farm is not over.

John Lesow
Tue, Jul 14, 2015, 3:13 pm
3 comments; last on Jul 22, 2015

Kudos to Our Police

Bellingham police are obviously trained to de-escalate armed confrontations. This is the way it should be.

Dick Conoboy
Mon, Jul 13, 2015, 4:38 am
6 comments; last on Jul 14, 2015

 

About NWCitizen

Donate to help support

Our writers
Thru the years

League of Women Voters

Feb 16 - Water discussion

Feb 25 - Up voter turnout

Local Online News

Bellingham Herald

Bham Business Journal
Bham Politics & Econ
Cascadia Weekly
Coal Stop
Ferndale Record
KGMI
Latte Republic
Lynden Tribune
Noisy Waters
Northern Light
Twilight Zoning
Western Front - WWU
Whatcom Watch

Local Causes

Chuckanut C. Forest

City Club of Bellingham
Community Wise Bham
Conservation NW
Futurewise - Whatcom
Lake Whatcom
Lummi Island Quarry
N. Cascades Audubon
NW Holocaust Center
Powder River Basin R. C.
RE Sources
Salish Sea Org.
Save the Granary
Transition Whatcom
WA Conservation Voters
Whatcom Peace & Justice

Our Governments

- Whatcom County

Bellingham
Port of Bellingham
Skagit County
US House
US Senate
US Supreme Court
US The White House
WA State
Whatcom COG

NWCitizen 1995-2007

Early Northwest Citizen

Weather & Climate

Cliff Mass Weather Blog

Climate Audit
EPIC World Photos
Nat Hurricane Center
NW Radar
Two day forecast
Watts Up With That?

Local Leisure

Adventures NW

Bellingham Wins
Entertainment NNW
Recreation Northwest

Good Web Sites

Al-Jazeera online

Alaska Dispatch
AlterNet.org
Antiwar.com
Arab News
Asia Times
Atlantic, The
Change The Mascot
Common Dreams
counterpunch
Crosscut Seattle
Daily Kos
Daily Mirror
Doonesbury
Drudge Report
Edge of Sports
FiveThirtyEight
Foreign Policy in Focus
GlobalPost
Guardian Unlimited
Gulf News
Haaretz
Huffington Post
Innocence Project
Irish Times
James Fallows
Jerusalem Post
Joel Connelly
Juan Cole
Julia Ioffe/New Republic
Le Diplo
Media Matters
Michael Moore
Middle East Times
MoveOn.org
Nation, The
New American Century
News Trust
NMFA
numbers
Online Journal
Palestine Daily
Palestine News
Paul Krugman
Personal bio info
Portland Indy Media
Progressive Review
Project Vote Smart
Reuters
Sea Shepherd
Slate
Stand for the Troops
Ta-Nehisi Coates
Talking Points Memo
TED
The Crisis Papers
The Intercept
the Oatmeal
Tom Paine.com
truthout
Vox
War and Piece
Washington Votes
WikiLeaks.ch
ynetnews.com

Quiet, Offline or Dead

Bellingham Register

Bhm Herald Politics Blog
Bob Sanders
Carl Weimer
Chuckanut Mountains
Citizen Ted
Citizens of Bellingham
Cordata & Meridian
David Hackworth
Facebook Port Reform
Friends of Whatcom
Get Whatcom Planning
HamsterTalk
Intrnational Herald Tribune
Jack Petree
MikeatthePort
N. Sound Conservancy
No Leaky Buckets
Northwest Review
Orcinus
Post-Oklahoman
Protect Bellingham Parks
Sweeney Politics
The American Telegraph
Wally Wonders