Why to vote NO on proposed Park District

Permalink +

Sat, Jan 26, 2013, 8:18 pm  //  Guest writer

By guest writer Phyllis McKee.  She owns commercial property within the district and has been involed in Fairhaven affairs for almost 40 years.

Why vote NO on Proposition #1, the Metropolitan Park District proposed for South Bellingham?

In one move, how could only those people owning property in south Bellingham (I-5 to the bay & city limits to South Hill) find themselves obligated to pick up the tab for a City-wide loan not due until 2017 and create an entity with the authority to, amongst other things, condemn property (and the property does not even need to be within the area being taxed), pay a wide-range of expenses, including paying its commissioners, and tax those same property owners forever, yet remain separate from and independent of City oversight or citizen vote?  Simple … by those Southside voters failing to recognize the Trojan Horse being pushed up to their doors and thereby failing to vote NO on Metropolitan Parks Proposition 1 on 2/12.  (Ballots are being delivered today and Monday.)

The two flawed assumptions are that it is the right and responsibility of Southside property owners to pay a debt that belongs to the entire City, and secondly, that the Metro-Park model is the best and only method to save the 100 acre/Chuckanut woods.  Neither is correct and both should be questioned.  Look behind the curtain before approving such action as getting that genie back in the bottle would be impossible.  As well-meaning as the Proponents may appear to be, to expect future commissioners to be bound by promises being made now is neither binding nor realistic.   The threat to develop all/part of the woods is a blatant scare-tactic and if proposed at all would be challenged by the citizenry.

Proponents insist that the taxation will be limited to $0.28 per $1000 valuation, for only 10 years, and then disband, but, but the one-size-fits-all tool they are using to create the Metropolitan Park District is a legal entity (like a corporation or LLC), a junior taxing district that has broad built-in authority including the ability to tax at $0.75/$1000 forever to support future goals.  Yes, future goals that could have little or nothing to do with woods, and what of the unresolved, over-lapping or conflicting authority with the existing City Parks branch of government?  None of this has even been addressed.  (Google Metropolitan Park District for some interesting, hair-raising reading.)

Furthermore, voting yes does not save the 100 acre woods … the biggest battle cry of the Proponents.  The 100 Acre Woods is already saved; it is already owned by the City.  All this fuss is over some internal loan the City Council made to purchase the property in the first place.  An internal loan that does not need to be paid back until December of 2017 … giving plenty of time to come up with more creative solutions than sticking a limited group of property owners with the bill.  Some contend that this is just a financial or economic vehicle/move, or some such thing.  Let me see.  Well, I guess it could be seen that way, just as me stepping up out of the blue to pay off your maxed out credit card might be seen as a financial or economic move.  By voting YES (or as importantly, failing to vote NO), those Southsiders are saying to Council, ‘here, let us take care of that for you so you do not have to worry about it’ when they should be saying ‘you created it,  fix it’, and then keeping an eye on the solutions proposed. 

Please understand that failure to vote at all just means fewer yes votes needed to pass.  Furthermore, please know that with (I believe) only three exceptions, those five Commissioners who will run the show, for all practical purposes the majority of those running and impossible to avoid, have been hand-picked by the Pro-side and will appear on the same ballot with the proposition.

Christopher Grannis  //  Sun, Jan 27, 2013, 8:47 am

Two more public meetings were held last Wednesday and Thursday to provide information to folks who wanted to learn more or discuss the proposed Chuckanut Community Forest District. On Thursday Five of the Candidates for Commissioner were among the group as were a few people who are opposed to the formation of the Park District. It was a cordial respectful meeting where everyone had a chance to say their piece. The Candidates all affirmed that if the district is formed the taxation will be limited to $0.28 per $1000 valuation, for only 10 years, and then disband. One person kept repeating that the taxation would be the maximum allowed and that taxes would be collected for ever. She said they, referring to the candidates who will be elected, wanted to annex all of the Chuckanuts, clear down to Bow. There was frustration because one person kept insisting the Commissioners would do what they had just said they would not do. John Brown pointed out that this is face to face democracy,  people discussing a way to preserve the ecological treasure that is a unique asset to our City and a part of why Bellingham is such a great place to live, and that democracy only works where there is trust. I trust the folks who have been part of the struggle to preserve the woods.
The proponents of the CCFD have all been involved for years. We were there a year ago at the City Council Finance Committee meetings when Council made it clear that they oppose using any portion of a future Greenways IV levy to repay to loan. We have done our home work. We have examined all of the possible ways to raise three plus million dollars and there are none except the Park District or sell part of the Park for high density development.
The reason this land was not developed decades ago like the land around it is that it is not easily developed. Because of the terrain and problems with access the infrastructure would be very expensive. To make it pencil out there would need to be a very high number of units. One number out there is 350 units on 25 acres. If you think this a scare tactic you need to do your home work.
The choice is clear, preservation or destruction by development. The proponents of the Park District are asking this community to vote to for preservation. This is democracy in action. Please vote for:
Cathy McKenzie Position 1
Dan Remsen or John Hymas Position 2
Susan Kaun Position 3
Vince Biciunas Position 4
John Brown Position 5
Please vote yes for the forest, vote yes for parks and healthy recreation, vote yes for wetlands and the salmon they support. Please Vote Yes for the Chuckanut Community Forest District.


Frank James  //  Sun, Jan 27, 2013, 9:29 am

What the developers like Phyllis, who does not even live in the district, do not want you to know is that voting NO for the District WILL increase your taxes. The infrastructure needed for this project would be millions of dollars. The very real costs that we pay for the utility infrastructure, schools, fire protection and other costs all add up for a development like this to more than the costs of buying the park! A detailed study was done by the nationally renowned urban planner of this specific site an our specific laws and tax structure that showed exactly that.

Don’t believe they hype of Bill and Phyllis, just follow the money and vote for the community and not special interests. If you want to see the Fodor study go to the Responsible Development website (RDnow.org) and search for Eben Fodor. Some of the details have changed since the study was completed but the basic facts are still the same. Allowing development on this property will cost us all more than preserving it as a park.


Delaine Clizbe  //  Sun, Jan 27, 2013, 10:14 am

Mr. James,
I keep hearing this argument from proponents that we will pay infrastructure costs if this land is built on.  Please tell what infrastructure costs have been accounted for in the development of a park on this land?  What proponents fail to realize is that the addition of this park to Fairhaven IS increasing traffic and congestion.  One major access point will likely be Fairhaven park and will necessitate folks traveling over the 12th street bridge to get to it.  Another access point, at several spots on 24th street will show increasing traffic.  As one poster on the Herald noted, “I go south for recreation and I go north for groceries”. 

What folks do not seem to realize is that the South Side of Bellingham is pretty much recreation central for all of Bellingham.  We sold a perfectly good home on Samish Way because of the huge increase in traffic due to folks heading to Lake Padden and Galbraith.  If anyone has driven by Lake Padden on a hot summer day you will see the huge issue it has become.  On opening day of fishing season or during an event like the Padden Triathlon you will even see cars parked up the side streets.

So it is a simplistic argument that “The folks on the south side should pay for the park that is benefiting them”.  We very much will be paying for a park that benefits the entire City.

Tell me, will the .28/1000 levy cover?:  Increased traffic on the 12th street bridge from folks accessing this park.  Parking lots on 24th street or traffic mitigation in that area. Wetland mitigation from increased traffic and parking on 24th street.  Bathroom facilities on the 24th street side of the property.(not everyone will be able to hold it until they get all the way over to Fairhaven Park) 

Where will the money come from to cover these costs?



Dan Pike  //  Sun, Jan 27, 2013, 10:51 am

Ms. Clizbe,
The costs of running the park will be part of the ongoing parks budget.  This was a purchase envisioned in the Greenways III levy, with the City Council envisioning up to $8 million of that levy being available for this purchase.  For background on that, since you allege I ‘overspent’ the Greenways allocation by gaining Council approval for the use of $4.5 million on this, please read this past NWCitizen article:

+ Link

Regarding why the Southside should bear this short-term, modest increase in property tax levies, more benefit accrues to those of us living here.  While it is of city-wide benefit, too, having the MPD kick in a bit more is a small price for preservation.  In the long run, we will all benefit, and not just from the preservation of an urban forest, with its ecological richness, but also because it makes Bellingham an even more attractive location for people who could choose to live anywhere, and plant their businesses anywhere. 

I’ve had conversations in the past with a prominent local businessman who is adamantly for lower taxes.  He complained when I was Mayor that he wished we would emulate Burlington, WA, which has a lower tax rate than Bellingham.  I asked if he’d prefer to live in Burlington, and he admitted he would not.  His business is here because of the kind of community we are, rich with natural, recreational, and cultural amenities.  To have all those, we tax ourselves more than many communities do. 

I am not blindly for more taxes; in fact the only veto I ever used was to veto a property tax increase in 2008.  However, to have the kind of community most living here vote for repeatedly, some taxes are required.  The supplemental taxes, such as the Greeways levies, public school funding, and this Park District levy are examples of where we, as citizens, get to make that choice.  It is not driven by those in office, but rather by how we colectively want to develop as a community.  i’m proud to live in a community that values the broader public benefit over a small personal financial savings.


Delaine Clizbe  //  Sun, Jan 27, 2013, 11:18 am

Mr. Pike,
I am a bit of a blonde so please explain to me how it is that I am about to taxed to pay back a loan when you sir did not overspend!

If that money is available in the Greenways III levy why am I being asked to pay more?


Delaine Clizbe  //  Sun, Jan 27, 2013, 11:27 am

Mr. Pike,
Will the on going parks budget cover the cost of traffic mitigation in the area as a result of this park?


Dan Pike  //  Sun, Jan 27, 2013, 12:19 pm

Ms. Clizbe,
Regarding being taxed for something on which I did not overspend, I would ask how I am controlling a majority of votes in this election, when I am not in office, and can only vote once?  Voters will choose whether or not to enact a new tax for the remainder of the loan.  Other alternatives include selling enough of the property to repay the balance.  Do you think allowing a vote is a bad idea?  Or perhaps you don’t trust your fellow citizens to vote appropriately?

As the link shows, a majority of the City Council that approved the Greenways III levy believed their vote was to authorize up to $8 million in Greenways funds to make this purchase; the overall price was less than the property was valued at in the early 1990’s.  A strong majority of voters approved said levy.  The City—at my urging—spent $4.5 million in Greenways III funds on this purchase.  Maybe I’ve got a bit of blonde in me, too—please explain, in simple terms, how spending $4.5 million of an allowed $8 million is overspending?  Thanks.

Regarding traffic mitigation, your comparison of Lake Padden with Chuckanut Ridge is an apples-to-oranges comparison.  As an undeveloped park, Chuckanut Ridge would generate about 2.5 trips/acre per day, according to standard ITE trip generation models, or about 200 additional trips per day.  Since these are distributed prety widely throughout the day, the overall impacts would be fairly minor.  In contrast, the proposed development at the property would have generated about 7,000 trips per day, with aggregations around the peak am and pm commute trip times, exacerbating already congested conditions.  Preserving this as a park will preclude that kind of trip loading on the neighborhood, and ensure the community does not get stuck with a huge burden for upgrading and widening the 12th Street bridge, which would cost millions of dollars.  Lake Padden is a developed park, with a golf course, ball fields, a robust trail system, and a popular swimming area.  That type of facility generates about 5 - 7 trips/acre/day, exclusive of the golf course.  Since Lake Padden is 160 acres, it generates around 1000 trips/day.  The golf course likely generates that much again, and because of its proximity to the rest of the park, it likely generates significant complementary use—golfers drop their familes off at the picnic area, etc—that is not going to occur at Chuckanut Ridge.  In addition, many of the users of Chuckanut Ridge are neighborhood residents who already use the park by walking to it, so there are no traffic impacts from that component.

Hope that clears up your questions.


Donald Duck  //  Sun, Jan 27, 2013, 4:11 pm

Without voting YES on Proposition 1, the city will ultimately need to pay off the loan by selling a portion of the property. A minimum of 250 units, more likely 350 units, would be built. The south end impacts and loss of parks legacy for future generations are worth the cost of a bowl of soup per month at the Colophon, and I like the citizen initiative. As a south end homeowner I am voting YES.


Delaine Clizbe  //  Sun, Jan 27, 2013, 6:26 pm

Mr. Pike,

I never said YOU were taxing me.  However, there is a lot that goes on behind the scenes in this town so who is to say who all the players are in this saga.

So I think I am starting to understand.  You and/or the City Council thought the Greenway III levy authorized 8 million on this purchase.  Ok.  So how is it you only had 4.5 million to spend on it?  You needed an additional 3.2 million.  I really don’t give a hoot what you “promised” to pay for the land.  For whatever reason you did not have the money, hence the loan from the Endowment.  And therefore, an over expenditure occurred. 

Your numbers for traffic patterns make sense.  However, I still think an extra 200 cars a day on the 12th street bridge would be an issue.  But hey, I’m all for some of the Padden traffic staying down in the lowlands because ultimately that makes MY neighborhood nicer:)

Can you please define for me what an “undeveloped park” is?  I would also be very interested to see an actual “park plan” for this land.


Delaine Clizbe  //  Sun, Jan 27, 2013, 8:11 pm

Mr, Hegedus,

I just happened to be visiting the Fairhaven Park Apartments/Padden Creek Apartments today.  I have always looked at those apartments as I run by on the interurban trail and think what a beautiful setting for folks to live.  A quick search of their website tells me that their complex is nestled on 14 acres and has 253 units.  Now, Mayor Linville suggested selling what? 20 something acres?  Folks should check out the Padden Creek Apartment complex for a little perspective on how much “development” we are talking about here.

Personally, I’m for putting in some nice multi-family dwellings, on the very small portion of land the Mayor Linville suggested,  so families can raise their children in a beautiful setting with trees and trails and the Fairhaven Park splash park in close proximity.  Now THAT would leave a legacy for the future!


Dan Pike  //  Sun, Jan 27, 2013, 10:14 pm

A correction to my earlier post:  Lake Padden Park is over 800 acres; Lake Padden the body of water is 160 acres at the surface.  That means the traffic generation of Lake Padden is about 5,000 trips per day, versus about 200 at Chuckanut Ridge.  I apologize for the error.

Ms. Clizbe,
Regarding your questions and responses to my earlier posts, I’m not sure what is unclear, nor do I understand why you think I overpaid.  Maybe we’ll simply need to accept that we have different perspectives on this issue, which is fine.  To try and restate what happened in buying the park, there were still I believe about $6.5 million in Greenways funds still unspent, and designated for southside parks acquisition.  As an aside, there is a myth that the north end was short-changed during my tenure regarding parks acquisition; in fact, including this purchase, we spent over twice as much acquiring north end parks as south end ones during my term—consistent with the Greenways III plan.

The Chuckanut Ridge purchase was limited, at my recommendation, to $4.5 million of Greenways funds to try and find a solution that worked for everyone in the community.  There was a great deal of divisiveness within both the Council and the greater community over whether it was $8 million, or $6 million, or a little over $4 million targeted for this purchase.  Three Councilmembers felt adamantly it was $8 million, two were at the middle figure, and two were at the $4 million and change amount.  By going with the lower end figure, using some available funds for parks acquisition that had to be spent in the south end and taking the balance as a $3.2 million loan, I hoped to settle the discord, and that we could have a community conversation about how to address the balance.  Among the methods to address this balance, we specifically discussed a temporary tax increase, and also the alternative of potentially selling some of the property.  This vote allows a community conversation, which I appreciate your participation in, of whether we want to tax ourselves to preserve the entire parcel.

As to what an ‘undeveloped’ park is, generally it means a park without features such as ball fields, defined swimming areas, basketball courts, or other amenities such as picnic areas, splash pools, etcetera.  The City of Bellingham’s Parks website has a spreadsheet listing the features of each park here: + Link

Of the five types of features listed (Sports fields, trails, play/picnic areas, water access, and other amenities), undeveloped parks would have only trails and/or water access.  By contrast, Lake Padden has all five boxes checked.  I am not certain what the status of the planning for this park is at this point.  To some degree, I expect it’s hinging on the current vote.  If you want something more specific, I’d suggest you contact the Parks department; staff are very knowledgeable and helpful, and will let you know what the status currently is, and how you can stay informed as things move forward.


Delaine Clizbe  //  Tue, Jan 29, 2013, 4:45 pm

Mr. Pike,
You know I have thought about it for a couple days now, running it over and over in my little head, but I still just can’t fathom how we ended up with a loan but you did not “overspend”

So I’m not even going to agree to disagree with you on this one!


Dan Pike  //  Tue, Jan 29, 2013, 5:50 pm

No worries, Ms. Clizbe.  Unless you paid full cash for every house and car you bought, either you overpaid, or you can figure out what I meant.  I’m simply trying to explain what went into my thinking, in a manner meant to foster civil dialog, something which is growing all too scarce at every level of our society.  However, I can only address my side of the conversation.  For what it’s worth, I’m glad to see you engaged, even while I disagree with your conclusions.

In any case, we can disagree to disagree, if you prefer.  I’ll leave you to figure out what that means.


“Friends and Neighbors”?

Mon, Apr 21, 2014, 12:59 pm  //  Terry Wechsler

A closer look at Whatcom County's industrial "stewards of the environment."

2 comments; last on Apr 22, 2014

Action Alert for Tonight: Waterfront Wildlife and Habitat Threatened

Mon, Apr 21, 2014, 10:43 am  //  Wendy Harris

The public needs to support city council and request that a waterfront habitat assessment include terrestrial species and habitat connectivity.

0 comments

Johns Repair

Specializing in German vehicles...

Water, Water Everywhere, but ...

Sat, Apr 19, 2014, 1:57 pm  //  Terry Wechsler

or How Not to Plan for Future Generations' Water Needs

10 comments; last on Apr 21, 2014

Charter Review and District Only Voting

Thu, Apr 17, 2014, 9:40 am  //  Riley Sweeney

A simple explanation of the Charter Review and analysis of District only voting

0 comments

Roosevelt Neighborhood Pleads for Left Turns

Wed, Apr 09, 2014, 8:07 am  //  Riley Sweeney

City pushes for Alabama Street improvements, residents speak out

3 comments; last on Apr 14, 2014

Assault

Sun, Apr 06, 2014, 3:29 pm  //  Guest writer

By Christopher Grannis: Wherein despite every effort and expense, citizens cannot make the City follow the law or work for neighborhoods

2 comments; last on Apr 07, 2014

Killer Industrial Jobs or Long-term Job Killers?

Sun, Apr 06, 2014, 11:52 am  //  Terry Wechsler

Why commenting on the EIS for Comp Plan revisions for Cherry Point means demanding an EIS in the first place.

4 comments; last on Apr 13, 2014

Anatomy of a Development Part XII - Citizens Win Against University Ridge

Wed, Apr 02, 2014, 5:00 am  //  Dick Conoboy

Ambling University Development Group pulls out. University Ridge will not be built.

12 comments; last on Apr 06, 2014

Tell County To Expand Scope of EIS Review for Plants and Animals

Tue, Apr 01, 2014, 12:27 pm  //  Wendy Harris

Please help us protect county wildlife by ensuring that the scope of the EIS review is adequate. A sample scoping letter is included.

0 comments

Public May Comment On EIS Scoping For County Comp. Plan Until April 7th

Mon, Mar 31, 2014, 1:23 am  //  Wendy Harris

The public has a week to comment on the scope of issues reviewed under the EIS.

0 comments

My State of the Lake Report for 2014

Fri, Mar 28, 2014, 12:32 am  //  Wendy Harris

On March 26, 2014 the city and county provided their update and assessment on the status of Lake Whatcom. This is mine.

2 comments; last on Apr 01, 2014

County Considers Purchasing Toxic Property

Wed, Mar 19, 2014, 9:32 am  //  Riley Sweeney

Riley digs into the county's plan to buy the county morgue

3 comments; last on Mar 24, 2014

Propaganda Replaces Public Information:  An Analysis of the Lake Whatcom TDML Process

Sun, Mar 16, 2014, 11:52 pm  //  Wendy Harris

The public is not provided with a proposed plan or adequate information prior to the annual "state of the lake" meeting

4 comments; last on Mar 18, 2014

Mobile Slaughter

Sat, Mar 15, 2014, 12:11 pm  //  Tip Johnson

Wherein there's a crackdown on growing plants, and plans to let slaughter run free

2 comments; last on Mar 16, 2014

Fukushima Radiation Found In Canada

Fri, Mar 14, 2014, 9:47 am  //  John Servais

Fukushima radiation has been found 20 miles from Whatcom County farmland along the Fraser River in British Columbia.

1 comments; last on Mar 17, 2014

Is ALEC Jr. Coming to Whatcom County or Bellingham Soon?

Wed, Mar 12, 2014, 7:28 am  //  Dick Conoboy

The infamous American Legislative Exchange Council plans to send its spawn to cities and counties throughout the U.S.

1 comments; last on Mar 24, 2014

Rep. Vincent Buys Appears to Break State Fundraising Laws

Tue, Mar 11, 2014, 10:24 am  //  Riley Sweeney

Riley catches State Rep. Vincent Buys for soliciting funds during session

0 comments

County Hires GPT Permit Lead as Senior Planner

Mon, Mar 10, 2014, 9:51 am  //  Riley Sweeney

Riley digs into an unusual hiring decision at the County Planning Dept

1 comments; last on Mar 10, 2014

Whatcom Watch Editor Resigns

Sun, Mar 02, 2014, 2:22 pm  //  John Servais

The editor of the Whatcom Watch, Richard Jehn, has resigned effective today. Chalk up a victory for Craig Cole and Pacific International Terminals.

8 comments; last on Mar 05, 2014

Relevant Documents to Libel Threat

Tue, Feb 25, 2014, 8:29 pm  //  John Servais

The full text of Craig Cole's threatening letter of libel against the Whatcom Watch. And the emptiness of the threat.

16 comments; last on Mar 20, 2014

Action Alert for Tonight: Waterfront Wildlife and Habitat Not Being Protected as Promised

Mon, Feb 24, 2014, 3:33 pm  //  Wendy Harris

We were led to believe the city would review waterfront wildlife and habitat connectivity. It turns out that the city intends to focus only on nearshore fish.

0 comments

Wendy Harris on Citizen Journalism

Sat, Feb 22, 2014, 12:16 am  //  Wendy Harris

Accepting the Paul deArmond award of citizen journalism on Feb 7, Wendh Harris gave this speech. We think it deserves its own post.

0 comments

Craig Cole Threatens Libel Suit

Wed, Feb 19, 2014, 4:48 pm  //  John Servais

Craig Cole, the local contact for the proposed Cherry Point coal port has threatened the Whatcom Watch with a libel lawsuit.

6 comments; last on Mar 20, 2014

Do Changing Liquor and Marijuana Laws Affect DUIs

Mon, Feb 17, 2014, 7:26 am  //  Riley Sweeney

Riley digs through court data and discovers the real impact of privatization and legalization

0 comments

Bellingham Seeks “Flexibility” To Sell Wholesale Rural Sewer Services

Sun, Feb 09, 2014, 9:35 pm  //  Wendy Harris

The mayor wants to amend a city law to increase flexibility for a GMA provision that should be used rarely, if ever at all.

3 comments; last on Feb 11, 2014

The Hidden Costs of Costco

Sun, Feb 09, 2014, 2:36 pm  //  Wendy Harris

Costco imposes indirect costs on our community that are as real and tangible as road construction expenses.

1 comments; last on Feb 13, 2014

Reid Boiler Works Burns Down

Sun, Feb 09, 2014, 9:13 am  //  John Servais

The old empty Reid Boiler Works industrial building in Fairhaven burned to the ground Saturday night.

0 comments

Panem et Circenses - Why I Did Not Watch “The Super Bowl”

Mon, Feb 03, 2014, 5:30 am  //  Dick Conoboy

Professional and even college sports have morphed into a circus of corporate greed and the fleecing of the public.

3 comments; last on Mar 01, 2014

Have You Exceeded Your Right To Information?

Sat, Feb 01, 2014, 12:35 am  //  Wendy Harris

Filing a public record request could land a citizen in jail under a proposal reflected in a Herald opinion article.

2 comments; last on Feb 03, 2014

Wendy Harris Receives deArmond Award for Citizen Journalism

Wed, Jan 29, 2014, 6:18 am  //  Guest writer

Tim Johnson writes about the first recipient of the Paul deArmond Citizen Journalism award, Whatcom County writer Wendy Harris.

3 comments; last on Feb 08, 2014

Anatomy of a Development Part XI - The Doldrums at University Ridge

Mon, Jan 20, 2014, 5:14 am  //  Dick Conoboy

The developers of University Ridge have been silent since shortly after the hearing examiner's decision on 23 October last year. Will they walk?

0 comments

The Marijuana Bowl

Sun, Jan 19, 2014, 8:39 pm  //  John Servais

Super Bowl ... Weed Bowl ... This bud's for you ... Bong Bowl ... Marijuana Bowl ... whatever. It is on!

1 comments; last on Jan 20, 2014

Port’s Alternative Marina Analysis a Scam

Tue, Jan 14, 2014, 2:19 pm  //  Guest writer

Do we actually need to say that we, as citizens, want accurate information from government officials?

1 comments; last on Jan 14, 2014

City too Poor for Power Pennies or Discrimination?

Fri, Dec 27, 2013, 4:00 am  //  Guest writer

Guest writer Barbara Perry writes about Bellingham Parks refusal to allow motorized wheel chairs to recharge at public electrical outlets.

6 comments; last on Jan 03, 2014

Port Memo Addresses Marina Fraud Allegations

Fri, Dec 20, 2013, 3:56 pm  //  Wendy Harris

A Port of Bellingham internal memo tries, but fails, to justify changes in cost estimates for alternative marina sites.

5 comments; last on Dec 22, 2013

Lummi Influence Over the Waterfront Planning Process Continues to Grow

Tue, Dec 17, 2013, 12:21 am  //  Wendy Harris

Army Corps advised DOE that it will not issue a waterfront permit without Lummi approval

2 comments; last on Jan 13, 2014

Gary Jensen Not Running for State Senate

Mon, Dec 16, 2013, 12:30 pm  //  John Servais

Ferndale Mayor Gary Jensen has decided not to file for the 42nd state Senate seat currently held by Doug Ericksen.

5 comments; last on Dec 24, 2013

Larrabee School; Its Future

Mon, Dec 09, 2013, 12:24 pm  //  Guest writer

Barbara Perry writes about the closed nature of the Bellingham School Board on the future of the Larrabee School.

1 comments; last on Dec 15, 2013

Steal this Waterfront: Costs without Benefit

Sat, Dec 07, 2013, 8:23 pm  //  Tip Johnson

Wherein the direct, indirect, hidden and lost opportunity costs make this a waterfront boondoggle of billions

3 comments; last on Dec 11, 2013

On Monday, City Council Votes “third and final” Approval of Waterfront Plan

Sat, Dec 07, 2013, 12:33 pm  //  Wendy Harris

Local activist calls on Bellingham City Council to table the unpopular waterfront plans and engage in meaningful public process

2 comments; last on Dec 08, 2013

Lecture on County Water Issues Draws Crowd

Fri, Dec 06, 2013, 11:03 pm  //  Wendy Harris

The county will be required to consider water quality and water quantity when planning rural growth.

3 comments; last on Dec 10, 2013

Video Exposes City Council Dysfunction on Waterfront Plan

Thu, Dec 05, 2013, 11:58 am  //  John Servais

The Political Junkie has posted a 3 minute video showing Bellingham City Council members explaining their idiocy for all of us to watch.

2 comments; last on Dec 06, 2013

The Bellingham “Riot” - Let’s Expand the Conversation

Thu, Dec 05, 2013, 5:00 am  //  Dick Conoboy

The post "riot" conversation is terribly lacking in several areas. We must expand the discussion or risk learning little from the experience.

3 comments; last on Dec 15, 2013

Cascadia Weekly Blasts Waterfront Plan

Wed, Dec 04, 2013, 10:53 am  //  John Servais

Bellingham City Council and Port of Bellingham finalize the waterfront plan. In his weekly Gristle, Tim Johnson blasts the corrupt public process.

4 comments; last on Dec 05, 2013

Waterfront Development Bonus Yet Another Bad Idea

Sat, Nov 30, 2013, 8:11 pm  //  Wendy Harris

The waterfront plan allows a development bonus for payments made to the Lake Whatcom land acquisition fund

1 comments; last on Dec 01, 2013

City and Port Ready To Act on Waterfront Plan

Fri, Nov 29, 2013, 9:43 pm  //  Wendy Harris

A number of important issues need to be resolved before waterfront planning is complete, but the city council and port commission are ready to act.

2 comments; last on Nov 30, 2013

Port Unable To Protect Public Safety

Fri, Nov 22, 2013, 9:01 pm  //  Wendy Harris

If the port can not construct the airport safely, should it be entrusted with dangerous waterfront cleanup work?

0 comments

Walmart and McDonald’s - Partners in Institutionalized Cluelessness

Wed, Nov 20, 2013, 5:03 am  //  Dick Conoboy

The advice coming from Walmart and McDonald's to its low paid employees becomes more and more bizarre and inane.

0 comments

Anatomy of a Development - Part X Appeals of the Hearing Examiner’s Decision

Tue, Nov 19, 2013, 5:35 am  //  Dick Conoboy

Ambling's motion to the hearing examiner for reconsideration was definitively rejected. The developer has not met the deadline for an appeal to the Superior Court

0 comments

Smoking Gun: Fraud and Deception

Mon, Nov 18, 2013, 2:18 pm  //  Guest writer

In which we find the hidden core of the waterfront plan is rotten through and through

7 comments; last on Nov 21, 2013

County Releases EIS, Prepares to Purchase Jail Site

Mon, Nov 18, 2013, 10:59 am  //  Riley Sweeney

The county takes two big steps forward on the new jail, while still missing the point

0 comments

Noballmacare and Setting the False Standard

Thu, Nov 14, 2013, 1:39 am  //  Tip Johnson

Dear Mr. President, There's a sucker born every minute, and two to take him.

7 comments; last on Nov 21, 2013

City Council Misled On Waterfront Planning

Wed, Nov 13, 2013, 3:16 pm  //  Wendy Harris

The city adminstration has been providing misleading/ incorrect information to the city council to avoid waterfront plan revisions.

1 comments; last on Nov 18, 2013

Election Analysis: What Happened with the Port Races?

Tue, Nov 12, 2013, 10:21 am  //  Riley Sweeney

Riley crunches the numbers on Renata and McAuley's races to find answers

2 comments; last on Nov 13, 2013

Puget Neighborhood Likely New Home for 1,300 Students

Tue, Nov 12, 2013, 5:16 am  //  Dick Conoboy

Puget Neighborhood will likely have in the immediate future 1,300 new rental units that will be marketed primarily to the student population.

0 comments

Gloomy Fate For Waterfront Wildlife

Sat, Nov 09, 2013, 9:47 pm  //  Wendy Harris

The COB administration continues in its refusal to analyze waterfront wildlife issues, even though this is a prerequisite step in protecting wildlife from the impacts of development

3 comments; last on Nov 10, 2013

Election Results - November 2013

Tue, Nov 05, 2013, 8:21 pm  //  John Servais

With lots of outside county money flowing in to our local races, this election is weird. But real - and we county residents have spoken.

11 comments; last on Nov 09, 2013

Health Insurance Scams - Washington Not Spared

Mon, Nov 04, 2013, 9:55 am  //  Dick Conoboy

The call of the dollar speaks more loudly to health insurance companies than does the voice and well-being of the consumer, even here in Washington.

8 comments; last on Nov 06, 2013

Anatomy of a Development - Part IX BMC Rule of Three Thwarts Plans

Thu, Oct 31, 2013, 10:19 am  //  Dick Conoboy

Four bedroom dorm rooms have been nixed by the hearing examiner. University Ridge may be in trouble as a cash cow for Ambling Development of Georgia

3 comments; last on Nov 04, 2013

The Slaughterhouse Referendum - Citizens Opposing Widespread Slaughter (COWS)

Mon, Oct 28, 2013, 10:19 pm  //  Tip Johnson

Wherein we discover why we exert our rights - and grab some more petitions before it's too late

3 comments; last on Nov 06, 2013

 

New Links

Julia Ioffe/New Republic
the Oatmeal

Current Interest

Community Wise Bellingham
counterpunch
Friends of Whatcom
Guardian Unlimited
Lummi Island Quarry
Reconveyance Challenge
Whatcom Elections

Publisher Recommended

counterpunch
GlobalPost
Guardian Unlimited
League of Women Voters
Paul Krugman - economics
Sweeney Politics

Local Blogs & News

Bellingham Herald
Bham Herald Politics Blog
Bham Politics & Economics
Bob Sanders
Cascadia Weekly
Citizen Ted
Ferndale Record
Friends of Whatcom
Get Whatcom Planning
HamsterTalk
Jack Petree
KGMI
Latte Republic
League of Women Voters
Lynden Tribune
MikeatthePort
Northern Light
Sweeney Politics
Twilight Zoning
Wally Wonders
Western Front - WWU
Whatcom Watch

Local Causes

Bellingham Police Activity
Chuckanut Community Forest
Chuckanut Mountains
Citizens of Bellingham
City Club of Bellingham
Community Wise Bellingham
Conservation NW
Cordata & Meridian
Facebook Port Reform
Futurewise - Whatcom
Lake Whatcom
Lummi Island Quarry
N. Cascades Audubon
NW Holocaust Center
RE Sources
Reconveyance Challenge
Reduce Jet Noise
Salish Sea Org.
Save the Granary Building
Transition Whatcom
WA Conservation Voters

Governments

Bellingham
Port of Bellingham
Skagit County
US - The White House
WA State Access
WA State Elections
WA State Legislature
Whatcom Auditor
Whatcom County
Whatcom Elections

Weather & Climate

Cliff Mass Weather Blog
Climate Audit
NW Radar
Two day forecast
Watts Up With That? - climate

Leisure

Adventures NW
Edge of Sports
Entertainment NNW
Famous Internet Skiers
Sailing Anarchy

Good Links

Al-Jazeera online
Alaska Dispatch
AlterNet.org
Antiwar.com
Arab News
Asia Times
Atlantic, The
Common Dreams
counterpunch
Crosscut Seattle
Daily Kos
Daily Mirror
Doonesbury
Drudge Report
FiveThirtyEight
Foreign Policy in Focus
GlobalPost
Guardian Unlimited
Gulf News
Haaretz
Huffington Post
Innocence Project, The
Intrnational Herald Tribune
James Fallows
Jerusalem Post
Joel Connelly
Juan Cole
Julia Ioffe/New Republic
Le Diplo
Media Matters
Michael Moore
Middle East Times
MoveOn.org
Nation, The
New American Century
News Trust
NMFA
numbers
Online Journal
Palestine Daily
Palestine News
Paul Krugman - economics
Personal bio info
Portland Indy Media
Progressive Review
Project Vote Smart
Reuters
Sea Shepherd
Slate
Talking Points Memo
the Oatmeal
Tom Paine.com
truthout
War and Piece
Washington Votes
WikiLeaks.ch
ynetnews.com

NwCitizen 1995 - 2007

Early Northwest Citizen

Internet At Its Best

TED

Quiet, Offline or Dead

Bellingham Register
Carl Weimer
David Hackworth
N. Sound Conservancy
No Leaky Buckets
Northwest Review
Orcinus
Post-Oklahoman Confessions
Protect Bellingham Parks
The American Telegraph
The Crisis Papers