Where Have We Been- Where Are We Going?
Permalink +Mon, Feb 15, 2010, 5:00 am // Craig Mayberry
I can distinctly remember standing in front of an Econ 100 class a number of years ago and teaching the students about business cycles. One of the charts I showed listed all the recessions going back to the Great Depression. What was interesting was that in the last 30 years there had only been 2 small recessions, one lasting 9 months in the early 90s, and the other about 9 years ago that lasted a whole 6 months. In effect, most people cannot remember the last time there were significant economic hard times.
The net result of these economic good times was Washington state government revenue growth in the 4% to 5% range and, with one exception in 2004, plenty of money to spread around and start new programs. Most elected officials in Olympia have not had to make 'hard' decisions because the economy was whirling along and so was the revenue.
Businesses had also become complacent and suddenly risky decisions seemed less risky. So what if loan applicants could not really afford the mortgage, home prices would rise and the bank would still be covered in the end. Automakers were no longer as innovative and got caught with gas prices heading north of $4.00 a gallon--and nothing to show but gas guzzling SUV’s in the showroom. Making money was easy, and after a while it seemed like nothing would change and the government had figured out a way to permanently end tough times.
Individuals also got caught up in the illusion. Taking on more debt was not a big deal, and saving was put on the back burner. People felt their jobs would last forever and the more they bought the better they felt. Pretty soon we were in a consumer society where big houses and big mortgages became the norm.
For most of the last couple of decades we have been in a feed-back loop with people spending lots of money, business accommodating without appreciating the risk, and politicians riding high with increased revenue and plenty of new programs to help their constituencies. The fundamental question now is whether things have actually changed or whether this recession is just another speed bump on the road to never ending economic growth.
Businesses and individuals seem to have made some big changes in how they view the future. Individuals are saving a little more and getting into a little less debt. Businesses are scaling back and planning on little to no growth for the next few years. Bank credit is like it used to be, available to those with good credit, tough for anyone without the means to pay it back. Government however still seems to believe good times are just around the corner and after a short rest, revenue growth will chug along again at 5% annual growth.
The siren call to solve budget issues through increased taxes hums from Olympia and Washington, D.C. The assumption being lack of revenue is only a short-term problem, not a long-term structural change. But what if this is not a short-term problem, and what if revenue does not return to 5% growth and instead flattens out to close to zero growth? Tax increases work when there is a short-term revenue issue and tax increases are used to fill the hole until better times return. Increased taxes also work when the people paying them are seeing their salaries go up more than the tax increases. If your salary goes up 4% and the government increases taxes by 2%, at least you are still ahead and will likely not complain too much.
What happens however, if this is not a short-term revenue problem? You increase taxes this year, but what happens in the next biennium when you have another deficit that needs to be fixed? If revenue stays flat for an extended period of time tax increases only prolong the hard decisions. What happens if taxpayers' salaries stay flat? Do you really think a taxpayer is going to pay higher taxes and decrease their consumption? People may adjust their spending patterns, but in the end governments will not collect any additional revenue.
We spend a lot of time talking about the importance of sustainability for both businesses and individuals. The implication is businesses/individuals need to conserve resources today and leave some for future generations. If we over consume today, we destroy opportunities for future generations. By the same token, maybe it is now time to talk about sustainable government. There are far more reasons to believe economic growth will slow down over the next decade than there are arguments it will keep going at 5%. If our elected officials continue to make decisions that require 5% growth, what happens if revenue growth does not materialize? What are the implications of individuals and businesses resetting to a new model of lower growth, but government does not? Do we really think government can continue business as usual while we expect everyone else to be more sustainable? Businesses and individuals are now paying the price for the consumerism of the last couple of decades, is it now time for government to adjust as well?
Sustainable government means three things. First, that growth is based on conservative forecasts, not the most optimistic. If revenue comes in high, first use it to make one-time investments (like pay down the unfunded pension liability.) If after a few years the long-term revenue forecast improves substantially, then talk about realistic new or expanded programs. The second implication of sustainable government is that local governments are the primary problem solvers, not the federal and state government. All issues are local and need to be solved locally. The third implication of sustainable government is that government employees are empowered to do their jobs. Unempowered employees are less effective and it shows in most interactions with government employees. Frustrations will grow and the same conversations will be repeated again and again until government becomes more sustainable, right along with the rest of us.
Ryan M. Ferris // Tue, Mar 02, 2010, 7:21 am
Thanks for your excellent article, but I disagree on many points. The banking and credit system is infinitely more well resourced than the government or the people. (Those of us who have worked in the world of Investment Banking know this quite well.) The top world leaders and lenders knew what they were doing by suffusing the U.S. economy with liquidity. Most consumers just wanted a better life. Literally, in the United States most consumers do not have the intelligence to read or understand the fine print or project “bubble economics” futures for themselves. When Jamie Dimon said we should expect a major economic crisis every 5 -7 years in the world we live in now, he is not talking about a reality most consumers know how to adjust to without savage damages to their communities and families. The bankrupt dynamics of the financially engineered economy for the last ten years was predicted by many scholars and commentators, still there was something far too sequenced about the collapse for me to believe.
I’ve come to the conclusion that our economic hard times were pre-determined. The goal is to weaken China’s economy while we maintain military supremacy through out the world. Like the syphilitic English Kings of Old, the power elite in America literally do not care if communities (e.g. peasants) like Bellingham disappear into poverty for 6 , 8 , 10 years as long as strategic goals for the attainment of wealth and power are maintained. And if such poverty brings down the entire country? Then they will use such “shock and awe” to take us back to pre
“FDR” style middle-classless existence and invest in other countries besides the U.S. If this is not what has happened already.
The preservation of democracy and our middle class in this country will not be found by blaming ourselves, blaming the poor or “the consumer”, shrinking community-based government programs, or thinking “that we are all in this together”. We are not.
Ryan M. Ferris
The Big Business of Breast Cancer
Wed, Feb 08, 2012, 8:14 am // Guest writer
2 comments; last on Feb 11, 2012
An inexpensive way to save children’s lives
Tue, Feb 07, 2012, 1:41 pm // John Servais
2 comments; last on Feb 09, 2012
UPDATE: City of Bham Moonlighting Issue - More Documents
Mon, Jan 30, 2012, 10:58 pm // Riley Sweeney
Riley updates us on the latest facts coming to light about City of Bellingham employee moonlighting2 comments; last on Feb 01, 2012
Compliance, Noncompliance and Invalidity in Whatcom County
Sun, Jan 29, 2012, 10:16 pm // Wendy Harris
The County's rural planning actions have not just failed to comply with the GMA...they have contradicted the goals of the GMA.3 comments; last on Feb 05, 2012
A Worm’s Eye View of our local WorkSource Center
Wed, Jan 25, 2012, 9:42 am // Riley Sweeney
0 comments
Watch out for basement flooding
Thu, Jan 19, 2012, 9:03 pm // Paul de Armond
5 comments; last on Jan 21, 2012
The Political Junkie interviews Kathy Kershner
Thu, Jan 19, 2012, 4:29 pm // Riley Sweeney
1 comments; last on Jan 20, 2012
SOPA - A Step in Destroying Democracy
Thu, Jan 19, 2012, 12:17 am // John Servais
NWCitizen.com went black for Wednesday, Jan 18, 2012, as a protest against proposed legislation, SOPA and PIPA. Here is what was posted.1 comments; last on Jan 19, 2012
Why SOPA is so terrible
Tue, Jan 17, 2012, 6:28 pm // John Servais
On Wednesday, thousands of websites will go dark to show opposition to SOPA. I will be posting a single article explaining who SOPA is so bad.0 comments
Planning Commissioner Mocks Environmental Concern For Coal Terminal
Sat, Jan 14, 2012, 11:06 pm // Wendy Harris
Planning Commissioner Onkels should recuse himself from review of environmental impacts at GPT.3 comments; last on Feb 08, 2012
Jack Petree, Olympia, the Whatcom Council and Obama’s Inner Circle
Wed, Jan 11, 2012, 8:04 am // Riley Sweeney
7 comments; last on Jan 15, 2012
Commmunity Governance at its Best
Mon, Jan 09, 2012, 8:27 pm // Tip Johnson
4 comments; last on Jan 10, 2012
Property Rights Protected Under Lake Whatcom Stormwater Proposal
Sun, Jan 08, 2012, 11:02 pm // Wendy Harris
The County's proposed stormwater regulations for Lake Whatcom will increase development without improving water quality2 comments; last on Jan 20, 2012
Riley Rouses Row Over Domestic Violence
Sun, Jan 08, 2012, 1:21 am // John Servais
Issue is County Council member Kathy Kershner and how our social service programs are funded.3 comments; last on Jan 08, 2012
Some thoughts on the Occupy Bellingham issue
Sun, Jan 01, 2012, 12:05 am // John Servais
A third note on Jan 1 about the Herald photos with links. And previous thoughts on the trivia around the militarized evictions.9 comments; last on Jan 10, 2012
Kelli Linville has taken oath as mayor
Fri, Dec 30, 2011, 2:07 pm // John Servais
Kelli assumes office of mayor at midnight Dec 316 comments; last on Jan 02, 2012
Bellingham Herald removes comments
Fri, Dec 30, 2011, 11:59 am // Wendy Harris
Decide for yourself if this blog comment, posted under my own name, should have been flagged and removed from the Bellingham Herald Online Edition.1 comments; last on Dec 30, 2011
Herald Permits Censorship of Pro-Occupy Bellingham Comments
Fri, Dec 30, 2011, 11:14 am // Wendy Harris
Anyone can "flag" a blog posting, resulting in immediate removal of your comment, regardless of merit. This is occuring for comments supporting OB.1 comments; last on Dec 30, 2011
City Exceeds Scope of Occupy Bellingham Eviction
Wed, Dec 28, 2011, 8:26 pm // Wendy Harris
The City infringed on the public’s right to peaceful assembly in a public park by enforcing an inappropriate public safety law2 comments; last on Dec 30, 2011
Dan Pike Issues Order to Evict Occupy Bellingham
Tue, Dec 27, 2011, 11:55 am // Riley Sweeney
Riley questions Pike's timing, and Occupy's choice of tactics2 comments; last on Dec 28, 2011
Updates from The Political Junkie
Tue, Dec 20, 2011, 2:19 pm // Riley Sweeney
0 comments
Dock Increases Risk of Invasive Species on Lake Whatcom
Sun, Dec 18, 2011, 8:43 pm // Wendy Harris
Relocation of a dock to Bloedel Donovan Park underscores failure to protect Lake Whatcom from invasive species0 comments
Sam Crawford Faces Ethical Concerns . . . AGAIN
Thu, Dec 15, 2011, 12:44 pm // Riley Sweeney
3 comments; last on Dec 16, 2011
Planning Commission Fails to Remove Cherry Point From Birch Bay Mitigation Plan
Wed, Dec 14, 2011, 7:05 am // Wendy Harris
Claiming it is unfair to treat large property owners different than small property owners, the Commission refuses to remove industrial areas from buffer mitigation proposal.0 comments
Rick Perry, Can We Talk?
Tue, Dec 13, 2011, 9:58 am // Riley Sweeney
2 comments; last on Dec 16, 2011
For Gift Ideas, Think Beyond Parker Brothers
Sat, Dec 10, 2011, 9:32 am // Riley Sweeney
2 comments; last on Dec 11, 2011
The Political Junkie needs your input
Thu, Dec 08, 2011, 12:47 pm // Riley Sweeney
0 comments
Loophole Benefits SSA and Undermines Birch Bay Mitigation Proposal
Wed, Dec 07, 2011, 7:00 am // Wendy Harris
Tell the Planning Commission to eliminate this loophole2 comments; last on Dec 14, 2011
Washington United for Marriage: It’s Time!
Tue, Dec 06, 2011, 11:12 am // Riley Sweeney
0 comments
The Cole Train: Loads of BS
Sun, Dec 04, 2011, 4:53 pm // Tip Johnson
2 comments; last on Dec 04, 2011
Update on Cherry Point Buffer Mitigation Proposal
Fri, Dec 02, 2011, 1:08 pm // Wendy Harris
Planning Staff's recommended revision will not prevent SSA from reducing wetland buffers.0 comments
UPDATE: City’s response focused on favoritism, not lost revenue
Wed, Nov 30, 2011, 5:51 pm // Riley Sweeney
More on the city employee moonlighting issue0 comments
TPJ Exclusive: Little Documented Oversight for City Employee Moonlighting
Mon, Nov 28, 2011, 4:29 pm // Riley Sweeney
7 comments; last on Nov 30, 2011
Deer me!
Sat, Nov 26, 2011, 3:30 pm // Tip Johnson
O.K. Who's in charge of all these ungulates?14 comments; last on Dec 01, 2011
County Proposal Includes New Cherry Point Buffer Mitigation Requirements
Tue, Nov 22, 2011, 9:29 pm // Wendy Harris
The County's new mitigation proposal is unlikely to be adequate for Cherry Point's industrial impacts to habitat buffers3 comments; last on Nov 24, 2011
CameraGate: Red-light safety or city revenue?
Mon, Nov 21, 2011, 1:00 am // Guest writer
26 comments; last on Nov 29, 2011
Cameras, not coal, decided the election
Sat, Nov 19, 2011, 8:24 pm // Paul de Armond
11 comments; last on Nov 22, 2011
Election Analysis: What does it take to win a county seat?
Fri, Nov 18, 2011, 12:28 pm // Riley Sweeney
0 comments
Election Analysis: Dropoff, Lynden Suburbs and the “Buys Bounce”
Thu, Nov 17, 2011, 5:20 pm // Riley Sweeney
0 comments
Political Junkie Election Analysis: Louws/Ericksen
Wed, Nov 16, 2011, 12:31 pm // Riley Sweeney
1 comments; last on Nov 17, 2011
Kelli Linville is elected Mayor of Bellingham
Tue, Nov 15, 2011, 5:21 pm // John Servais
Results are posted as of 5:21 pm. Use links at top of right side column.2 comments; last on Nov 15, 2011
New links
Colbert Super PacCurrent Interest
Bham Camera ScamColbert Super Pac
Local Blogs & News
Bellingham HeraldBham Politics & Economics
Bhm Herald Politics Blog
Bob Sanders
Cascadia Weekly
Citizen Ted
Ferndale Record
Foothills Gazette
Get Whatcom Planning
HamsterTalk
KGMI
Latte Republic
Lynden Tribune
MikeatthePort
Northern Light
Northwest Review
Sweeney Politics
Twilight Zoning
Wally Wonders
Western Front - WWU
Whatcom Watch
Local causes
Bham Camera ScamBham CofC political blog
Chuckanut Mountains
Citizens of Bellingham
City Club of Bham
Community Wise Bellingham
Conservation NW
Cordata & Meridian
Futurewise - Whatcom
Jail - local mega plans
Lake Whatcom
N. Cascades Audubon
N. Sound Conservancy
Neighborhood Schools Coalition
No Leaky Buckets
NW Holocaust Center
RE Sources
Transition Whatcom
WA Conservation Voters
Publisher recommended
Americans Elect 2012Bham Politics & Economics
Community Wise Bellingham
Guardian Unlimited
Paul Krugman - economics
Redistricting WA state
Sweeney Politics
Watts Up With That? - climate
WikiLeaks.ch
NwCitizen 1995 to 2008
Early Northwest CitizenWeather & Climate
Cliff Mass Weather BlogClimate Audit
NW Radar
Two day forecast
Watts Up With That? - climate
Cascadia
Crosscut SeattleJoel Connelly
Orcinus
Portland Indy Media
Seattle Indy Media
Washington Votes
Leisure
Adventures NWEdge of Sports
Entertainment NNW
Famous Internet Skiers
Sailing Anarchy
Worth checking out
Al-Jazeera onlineAlaska Dispatch
AlterNet.org
Americans Elect 2012
Antiwar.com
Arab News
Asia Times
Atlantic, The
Buzz Flash
Common Dreams
counterpunch
Daily Beast, The
Daily Kos
Daily Mirror
Drudge Report
FiveThirtyEight
Foreign Policy in Focus
Guardian Unlimited
Gulf News
Haaretz
Huffington Post
Innocence Project, The
Intrnational Herald Tribune
James Fallows
Jerusalem Post
Juan Cole
Le Diplo
Media Matters
Middle East Times
MoveOn.org
Nation, The
New American Century
News Trust
NMFA
numbers
Online Journal
Palestine Daily
Palestine News
Paul Krugman - economics
Personal bio info
Politico
Progressive Review
Project Vote Smart
Reuters
Sea Shepherd
Slate
Talking Points Memo
The Onion
Tom Paine.com
truthout
War and Piece
WikiLeaks.ch
ynetnews.com
Governments
Auditor election pageBellingham
Bham - PFD
Candidate Filings
Election Results
Redistricting WA state
Skagit County
The White House
WA State Access
WA State Elections
WA State Legislature
Whatcom Auditor
Whatcom County
Other - for whatever
Ban Red Light CamsBushFlash.com
Chickehhawks
Coal quandary
Doonesbury
George Bush
Info Clearing House
Mainstreampolitics
Michael Moore
Nat Geo on Coal Trains
Reality News
The Crisis Papers
Third World Traveler
Unity08
Washington Outsiders
Less active
Bellingham RegisterCarl Weimer
Eye on Whatcom
John Watts
Post-Oklahoman Confessions
The American Telegraph
Quiet, offline or dead
David HackworthGitmo prisoner 345
Mega Awesome
Not in my county
Parkenfarker
Pro-Whatcom
