The Way I See It - Flying Blind
Permalink +Wed, Jan 06, 2010, 4:59 am // Ham Hayes
To add a comment, login or register.
I fly several times a year, much of it international. I know my fate, when flying, is totally out of my control and I accept that. In fact I was flying this last Christmas Day from Seattle to Austin, Texas. After landing, I found out about the attempted bombing of Flight 253, and was thankful my wife and I were safe. I was also thankful for the courageous passengers and crew of 253, as well as the many people in the airline industry and government who watch out for our safety and security. There is no doubt in my mind that since 9/11, without the efforts of those folks, we would have had many more incidents. However, given the Christmas event, it is important for the general public, as well as those who provide our security, to understand whether we are doing what is actually needed. We also need to understand whether we are out-thinking those who wish to harm us.
There are about 900 international flights entering the U.S. and more than 28,000 total flights in the U.S. every day. That puts the number of passengers who have to be screened on the order of several million per day. Providing security for that number of people and flights is a huge task. Those of us who fly feel that impact in the form of long lines and sometimes seemingly new and bizarre procedures. For example, no one had to remove their shoes prior to Richard Reid’s unsuccessful bombing attempt. The fact is, as the threat changes our defenses have to adjust as well. Those trying to take down an airliner are on the offensive and look for weak spots in our defense. They will devise new methods to accomplish their aims, but our security systems seem designed to counter threats that have already been attempted. Our security systems also employ a layered approach and use a variety of techniques to uncover a plot. Intelligence gathering and no-fly lists are examples of additional layers to the passenger and baggage inspection procedures in place at airports. Clearly in the Christmas event, both inspection and intelligence broke down.
There was a breakdown of the post-event protocols as well. CNN reports other airliners that were still in the air were not notified of the event, which was a violation of federal requirements (and common sense). The 9/11 attack involved multiple airliners; the notification is intended to give aircrews information they need in case we are under another coordinated multiple-plane attack. The first officer quoted by CNN, Steve Danyluk, said he was “justifiably furious” at the lack of notification and noted that “gaping holes in our response have been exposed...” Danyluk also pointed out that billions of dollars were spent subsequent to 9/11 to provide notification, and he questions why the system wasn’t used. Unlike his experience as a military pilot, he postulated the government failed to run tests and simulations of non-military disaster response systems which would uncover flaws and disconnects. His point is excellent.
My concern is that common sense and meaningful leadership is missing in our government and security institutions. I don’t want to hear that protocols were followed and the system worked. Clearly those are now known myths exposed by what happened in the real world. The system is clearly broken, unfortunately in a number of ways. Our leaders need to stop playing blame-ball, listen to the professionals and fix it. My family, friends, neighbors and all the trusting souls I fly with deserve honesty, integrity and action by our government. No other course of action is acceptable.
Comments (2)
To add a comment, click here to login or register.
David Camp // Wed, Jan 06, 2010, 4:03 pm
In a Federal Government where incompetence is rewarded (George Tenet, e.g.), and there is no accountability nor consequence for not doing your job, this kind of thing is bound to happen.
Add to this a secret service cluster-frap of overlapping jurisdictions and freelancing racketeers, corrupted by profiteering private interests and infiltrated by foreign spies at every level - it’s surprising that intelligence of any value is available.
Nope - it’s easier to layer on another inconvenience to the poor schmucks who pay for all this. It wouldn’t surprise me if the TSA soon requires all passengers to strip down to nothing and wear a government issue paper jump suit to fly. Call it Guantanamo lite. But you have to pay for your food.
Add to this a secret service cluster-frap of overlapping jurisdictions and freelancing racketeers, corrupted by profiteering private interests and infiltrated by foreign spies at every level - it’s surprising that intelligence of any value is available.
Nope - it’s easier to layer on another inconvenience to the poor schmucks who pay for all this. It wouldn’t surprise me if the TSA soon requires all passengers to strip down to nothing and wear a government issue paper jump suit to fly. Call it Guantanamo lite. But you have to pay for your food.
Paul de Armond // Sat, Jan 09, 2010, 6:28 am
This whole subject is more deserving of a post (which I’ll probably do in the future) as opposed to a long comment. But here it goes anyway. The terrorism issue is seriously clouded by a lack of understanding and a history of unrealistic policy decisions. This is nothing new and probably won’t get much better.
First and foremost, the notion of complete security is an utter chimera. If we want complete security, we’d better be prepared to live in the equivalent of a Supermax prison facility.
The purpose of security programs is to diminish the risk and make attacks as difficult as possible.
One starting place is to accurately assess the risk. The United States has had exactly three domestic incidents of mass casualty terrorism in the last 100 years: The 1924 Wall Street bombing, The Oklahoma City Bombing and the 9/11 attacks. As Bruce Hoffman pointed out in the late 1990s, the risk of being harmed in a terrorist attack is less than the risk to dog owners of being savaged by their pets.
The difference is that terrorist violence gets massive amounts of publicity and people getting attacked by their pets gets virtually none.
The second requirement is to accurately assess the source of the attacks. Even restricting ourselves to just the period from 9/11 to the present, the vast majority of domestic attacks on US citizens (both completed and prevented) has not involved foreigners, but Americans. The vast number of incidents in the US were the work of domestic extremists. On this criterion alone, US anti-terrorism policy is deeply and seriously flawed.
One approach to getting a grip on where the threat is coming from is the maintenance of terrorism databases that list every single incident with the pertinent details. One such database is the RAND/St Andrews terrorism database, originally created by Bruce Hoffman and Magnus Ranstorp.
The picture that emerges is very different from the hype and buzz thrashed out in the popular media. Unfortunately, this sort of education requires reading books rather than watching thrillers on video. As such, it appears to be beyond the grasp of both public and policy makers.
If we wish to approach terrorism as a policy issue, the first step is to educate ourselves about the facts. The second is to evaluate risks posed by terrorists and the benefits and drawbacks of current policies. The third is consider the history of past policies and evaluate their effectiveness.
A republic should consider different policies than authoritarian states. Or just get down to it, throw in the towel and embrace massacre, torture and a police state. Enough of these half measure: fly naked, shoot on sight and don’t ask any questions.
First and foremost, the notion of complete security is an utter chimera. If we want complete security, we’d better be prepared to live in the equivalent of a Supermax prison facility.
The purpose of security programs is to diminish the risk and make attacks as difficult as possible.
One starting place is to accurately assess the risk. The United States has had exactly three domestic incidents of mass casualty terrorism in the last 100 years: The 1924 Wall Street bombing, The Oklahoma City Bombing and the 9/11 attacks. As Bruce Hoffman pointed out in the late 1990s, the risk of being harmed in a terrorist attack is less than the risk to dog owners of being savaged by their pets.
The difference is that terrorist violence gets massive amounts of publicity and people getting attacked by their pets gets virtually none.
The second requirement is to accurately assess the source of the attacks. Even restricting ourselves to just the period from 9/11 to the present, the vast majority of domestic attacks on US citizens (both completed and prevented) has not involved foreigners, but Americans. The vast number of incidents in the US were the work of domestic extremists. On this criterion alone, US anti-terrorism policy is deeply and seriously flawed.
One approach to getting a grip on where the threat is coming from is the maintenance of terrorism databases that list every single incident with the pertinent details. One such database is the RAND/St Andrews terrorism database, originally created by Bruce Hoffman and Magnus Ranstorp.
The picture that emerges is very different from the hype and buzz thrashed out in the popular media. Unfortunately, this sort of education requires reading books rather than watching thrillers on video. As such, it appears to be beyond the grasp of both public and policy makers.
If we wish to approach terrorism as a policy issue, the first step is to educate ourselves about the facts. The second is to evaluate risks posed by terrorists and the benefits and drawbacks of current policies. The third is consider the history of past policies and evaluate their effectiveness.
A republic should consider different policies than authoritarian states. Or just get down to it, throw in the towel and embrace massacre, torture and a police state. Enough of these half measure: fly naked, shoot on sight and don’t ask any questions.
The Big Business of Breast Cancer
Wed, Feb 08, 2012, 8:14 am // Guest writer
There’s no profit in searching for causes, and we know there's no real cure. But there's big money in the detection and treatment of breast cancer.
2 comments; last on Feb 11, 2012
An inexpensive way to save children’s lives
Tue, Feb 07, 2012, 1:41 pm // John Servais
Bellingham is slowly installing flashing yellow lights for school zones. This is far better than trapping drivers with speed zone cameras. But, no city revenue.
2 comments; last on Feb 09, 2012
UPDATE: City of Bham Moonlighting Issue - More Documents
Mon, Jan 30, 2012, 10:58 pm // Riley Sweeney
Riley updates us on the latest facts coming to light about City of Bellingham employee moonlighting2 comments; last on Feb 01, 2012
Compliance, Noncompliance and Invalidity in Whatcom County
Sun, Jan 29, 2012, 10:16 pm // Wendy Harris
The County's rural planning actions have not just failed to comply with the GMA...they have contradicted the goals of the GMA.3 comments; last on Feb 05, 2012
A Worm’s Eye View of our local WorkSource Center
Wed, Jan 25, 2012, 9:42 am // Riley Sweeney
Riley visits the local WorkSource center and interviews the regional director
0 comments
Watch out for basement flooding
Thu, Jan 19, 2012, 9:03 pm // Paul de Armond
Stormwater surge may back up sewers
5 comments; last on Jan 21, 2012
The Political Junkie interviews Kathy Kershner
Thu, Jan 19, 2012, 4:29 pm // Riley Sweeney
Riley discusses the Jail, Jack Louws, and an impartial council with our new Council Chair
1 comments; last on Jan 20, 2012
SOPA - A Step in Destroying Democracy
Thu, Jan 19, 2012, 12:17 am // John Servais
NWCitizen.com went black for Wednesday, Jan 18, 2012, as a protest against proposed legislation, SOPA and PIPA. Here is what was posted.1 comments; last on Jan 19, 2012
Why SOPA is so terrible
Tue, Jan 17, 2012, 6:28 pm // John Servais
On Wednesday, thousands of websites will go dark to show opposition to SOPA. I will be posting a single article explaining who SOPA is so bad.0 comments
Planning Commissioner Mocks Environmental Concern For Coal Terminal
Sat, Jan 14, 2012, 11:06 pm // Wendy Harris
Planning Commissioner Onkels should recuse himself from review of environmental impacts at GPT.3 comments; last on Feb 08, 2012
Jack Petree, Olympia, the Whatcom Council and Obama’s Inner Circle
Wed, Jan 11, 2012, 8:04 am // Riley Sweeney
Latest from the Political Junkie on a variety of subjects
7 comments; last on Jan 15, 2012
Commmunity Governance at its Best
Mon, Jan 09, 2012, 8:27 pm // Tip Johnson
We have a new mayor!
4 comments; last on Jan 10, 2012
Property Rights Protected Under Lake Whatcom Stormwater Proposal
Sun, Jan 08, 2012, 11:02 pm // Wendy Harris
The County's proposed stormwater regulations for Lake Whatcom will increase development without improving water quality2 comments; last on Jan 20, 2012
Riley Rouses Row Over Domestic Violence
Sun, Jan 08, 2012, 1:21 am // John Servais
Issue is County Council member Kathy Kershner and how our social service programs are funded.3 comments; last on Jan 08, 2012
Some thoughts on the Occupy Bellingham issue
Sun, Jan 01, 2012, 12:05 am // John Servais
A third note on Jan 1 about the Herald photos with links. And previous thoughts on the trivia around the militarized evictions.9 comments; last on Jan 10, 2012
Kelli Linville has taken oath as mayor
Fri, Dec 30, 2011, 2:07 pm // John Servais
Kelli assumes office of mayor at midnight Dec 316 comments; last on Jan 02, 2012
Bellingham Herald removes comments
Fri, Dec 30, 2011, 11:59 am // Wendy Harris
Decide for yourself if this blog comment, posted under my own name, should have been flagged and removed from the Bellingham Herald Online Edition.1 comments; last on Dec 30, 2011
Herald Permits Censorship of Pro-Occupy Bellingham Comments
Fri, Dec 30, 2011, 11:14 am // Wendy Harris
Anyone can "flag" a blog posting, resulting in immediate removal of your comment, regardless of merit. This is occuring for comments supporting OB.1 comments; last on Dec 30, 2011
City Exceeds Scope of Occupy Bellingham Eviction
Wed, Dec 28, 2011, 8:26 pm // Wendy Harris
The City infringed on the public’s right to peaceful assembly in a public park by enforcing an inappropriate public safety law2 comments; last on Dec 30, 2011
Dan Pike Issues Order to Evict Occupy Bellingham
Tue, Dec 27, 2011, 11:55 am // Riley Sweeney
Riley questions Pike's timing, and Occupy's choice of tactics2 comments; last on Dec 28, 2011
Updates from The Political Junkie
Tue, Dec 20, 2011, 2:19 pm // Riley Sweeney
Where Riley provides more info on the City of Bellingham employees moonlighting issue and Crawford's ethical troubles
0 comments
Dock Increases Risk of Invasive Species on Lake Whatcom
Sun, Dec 18, 2011, 8:43 pm // Wendy Harris
Relocation of a dock to Bloedel Donovan Park underscores failure to protect Lake Whatcom from invasive species0 comments
Sam Crawford Faces Ethical Concerns . . . AGAIN
Thu, Dec 15, 2011, 12:44 pm // Riley Sweeney
Local blogger Shane Roth files ethical complaint over Crawford's sweetheart deals
3 comments; last on Dec 16, 2011
Planning Commission Fails to Remove Cherry Point From Birch Bay Mitigation Plan
Wed, Dec 14, 2011, 7:05 am // Wendy Harris
Claiming it is unfair to treat large property owners different than small property owners, the Commission refuses to remove industrial areas from buffer mitigation proposal.0 comments
Rick Perry, Can We Talk?
Tue, Dec 13, 2011, 9:58 am // Riley Sweeney
Riley has a conversation with Rick Perry
2 comments; last on Dec 16, 2011
For Gift Ideas, Think Beyond Parker Brothers
Sat, Dec 10, 2011, 9:32 am // Riley Sweeney
Riley discusses his love of board games and some good gift ideas
2 comments; last on Dec 11, 2011
The Political Junkie needs your input
Thu, Dec 08, 2011, 12:47 pm // Riley Sweeney
Please take my reader's survey, I'm planning 2012
0 comments
Loophole Benefits SSA and Undermines Birch Bay Mitigation Proposal
Wed, Dec 07, 2011, 7:00 am // Wendy Harris
Tell the Planning Commission to eliminate this loophole2 comments; last on Dec 14, 2011
Washington United for Marriage: It’s Time!
Tue, Dec 06, 2011, 11:12 am // Riley Sweeney
Riley attends a public meeting on equality
0 comments
The Cole Train: Loads of BS
Sun, Dec 04, 2011, 4:53 pm // Tip Johnson
Wherein the sooty prospect of economic necessity rears its ugly head
2 comments; last on Dec 04, 2011
Update on Cherry Point Buffer Mitigation Proposal
Fri, Dec 02, 2011, 1:08 pm // Wendy Harris
Planning Staff's recommended revision will not prevent SSA from reducing wetland buffers.0 comments
UPDATE: City’s response focused on favoritism, not lost revenue
Wed, Nov 30, 2011, 5:51 pm // Riley Sweeney
More on the city employee moonlighting issue0 comments
TPJ Exclusive: Little Documented Oversight for City Employee Moonlighting
Mon, Nov 28, 2011, 4:29 pm // Riley Sweeney
The Political Junkie breaks a story of employee moonlighting within city of Bellingham
7 comments; last on Nov 30, 2011
Deer me!
Sat, Nov 26, 2011, 3:30 pm // Tip Johnson
O.K. Who's in charge of all these ungulates?14 comments; last on Dec 01, 2011
County Proposal Includes New Cherry Point Buffer Mitigation Requirements
Tue, Nov 22, 2011, 9:29 pm // Wendy Harris
The County's new mitigation proposal is unlikely to be adequate for Cherry Point's industrial impacts to habitat buffers3 comments; last on Nov 24, 2011
CameraGate: Red-light safety or city revenue?
Mon, Nov 21, 2011, 1:00 am // Guest writer
With budget woes, Bellingham passes on safety in favor of cash. Starting in 2008, Bellingham officials were coached by ATS on how to get Red Light cameras through…
26 comments; last on Nov 29, 2011
Cameras, not coal, decided the election
Sat, Nov 19, 2011, 8:24 pm // Paul de Armond
Looking at the numbers for the Bellingham elections
11 comments; last on Nov 22, 2011
Election Analysis: What does it take to win a county seat?
Fri, Nov 18, 2011, 12:28 pm // Riley Sweeney
Riley examines Maginnis/Crawford and Kremen/Larson
0 comments
Election Analysis: Dropoff, Lynden Suburbs and the “Buys Bounce”
Thu, Nov 17, 2011, 5:20 pm // Riley Sweeney
Riley looks at Lynden and coins some new phrases.
0 comments
Political Junkie Election Analysis: Louws/Ericksen
Wed, Nov 16, 2011, 12:31 pm // Riley Sweeney
Riley takes a look at Louws/Ericksen in the search for moderate Republicans
1 comments; last on Nov 17, 2011
Kelli Linville is elected Mayor of Bellingham
Tue, Nov 15, 2011, 5:21 pm // John Servais
Results are posted as of 5:21 pm. Use links at top of right side column.2 comments; last on Nov 15, 2011
New links
Colbert Super PacCurrent Interest
Bham Camera ScamColbert Super Pac
Local Blogs & News
Bellingham HeraldBham Politics & Economics
Bhm Herald Politics Blog
Bob Sanders
Cascadia Weekly
Citizen Ted
Ferndale Record
Foothills Gazette
Get Whatcom Planning
HamsterTalk
KGMI
Latte Republic
Lynden Tribune
MikeatthePort
Northern Light
Northwest Review
Sweeney Politics
Twilight Zoning
Wally Wonders
Western Front - WWU
Whatcom Watch
Local causes
Bham Camera ScamBham CofC political blog
Chuckanut Mountains
Citizens of Bellingham
City Club of Bham
Community Wise Bellingham
Conservation NW
Cordata & Meridian
Futurewise - Whatcom
Jail - local mega plans
Lake Whatcom
N. Cascades Audubon
N. Sound Conservancy
Neighborhood Schools Coalition
No Leaky Buckets
NW Holocaust Center
RE Sources
Transition Whatcom
WA Conservation Voters
Publisher recommended
Americans Elect 2012Bham Politics & Economics
Community Wise Bellingham
Guardian Unlimited
Paul Krugman - economics
Redistricting WA state
Sweeney Politics
Watts Up With That? - climate
WikiLeaks.ch
NwCitizen 1995 to 2008
Early Northwest CitizenWeather & Climate
Cliff Mass Weather BlogClimate Audit
NW Radar
Two day forecast
Watts Up With That? - climate
Cascadia
Crosscut SeattleJoel Connelly
Orcinus
Portland Indy Media
Seattle Indy Media
Washington Votes
Leisure
Adventures NWEdge of Sports
Entertainment NNW
Famous Internet Skiers
Sailing Anarchy
Worth checking out
Al-Jazeera onlineAlaska Dispatch
AlterNet.org
Americans Elect 2012
Antiwar.com
Arab News
Asia Times
Atlantic, The
Buzz Flash
Common Dreams
counterpunch
Daily Beast, The
Daily Kos
Daily Mirror
Drudge Report
FiveThirtyEight
Foreign Policy in Focus
Guardian Unlimited
Gulf News
Haaretz
Huffington Post
Innocence Project, The
Intrnational Herald Tribune
James Fallows
Jerusalem Post
Juan Cole
Le Diplo
Media Matters
Middle East Times
MoveOn.org
Nation, The
New American Century
News Trust
NMFA
numbers
Online Journal
Palestine Daily
Palestine News
Paul Krugman - economics
Personal bio info
Politico
Progressive Review
Project Vote Smart
Reuters
Sea Shepherd
Slate
Talking Points Memo
The Onion
Tom Paine.com
truthout
War and Piece
WikiLeaks.ch
ynetnews.com
Governments
Auditor election pageBellingham
Bham - PFD
Candidate Filings
Election Results
Redistricting WA state
Skagit County
The White House
WA State Access
WA State Elections
WA State Legislature
Whatcom Auditor
Whatcom County
Other - for whatever
Ban Red Light CamsBushFlash.com
Chickehhawks
Coal quandary
Doonesbury
George Bush
Info Clearing House
Mainstreampolitics
Michael Moore
Nat Geo on Coal Trains
Reality News
The Crisis Papers
Third World Traveler
Unity08
Washington Outsiders
Less active
Bellingham RegisterCarl Weimer
Eye on Whatcom
John Watts
Post-Oklahoman Confessions
The American Telegraph
Quiet, offline or dead
David HackworthGitmo prisoner 345
Mega Awesome
Not in my county
Parkenfarker
Pro-Whatcom