Meat Axe or Scalpel?

Permalink +

Sat, Nov 03, 2012, 1:21 pm  //  Tip Johnson

Dear Council Members,

I am writing to request that you delay action on agenda bill ab2012-300.

According to the UNFAO (United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization), small scale chicken slaughter for 500 birds per hour can be accommodated in about 2,500 square feet.  The 15,000 square feet limit proposed for adoption in the agricultural zone might accordingly accommodate the slaughter of 3,000 birds per hour.  This UNFAO estimate assumes the use of relatively low-capital, traditional methods.  Using more automated, modern machinery and methods might double this volume.

It could mean more than 75,000 animals per facility per day.  According to the UNFAO, processing these numbers with these methods would use more than a half million gallons of water per day, and introduce over an ounce of combined treatment targets per gallon of wastewater - potentially more than 18 million pounds of waterborne pollution annually for the 3,000 birds per hour the proposed facility limit would enable using traditional methods.

Where is sufficient water supply and treatment capacity available in the agricultural zone?  Are there places that could not supply or accept these volumes?  Are there soils that cannot sustain lagoons and infiltration?  Are there public or community facilities like schools and churches that might not want to be downwind from such facilities?  Are there county roads that shouldn't be subjected to truckloads of animals bound for slaughter?

What about the supply of 75,000 or more birds per day?  Will they be trucked in?  How many agricultural properties might be encouraged to raise feedstocks for these facilities?  Will they be spread throughout the agricultural zone or should the best suited districts be identified and designated?  Do we want truckloads of animals packed in cages spreading feathers and waste on their way to slaughter becoming a common sight on any county road?  Could they be located in the areas that can best support them with water supply, treatment capacity and proximity to adequate transportation?

The slaughter industry is subject to diseconomies that have propelled a massive consolidation and facility expansion trend.  In slaughter terms, more is definitely better.  The current code proposal may not adequately anticipate the pressure of scale this industry has been experiencing.  How will siting a facility affect adjoining properties?  To what extent will facilities tend to promulgate, lobby for expansion, consolidate and integrate with local producers?  That is the industry's story, yet the findings and conclusions fail to note or respond.

I encourage the council to postpone action on the proposed change until industry trends have been better studied and understood.  In particular, the utility of this amendment to poultry production and the concept of "edible rendering" may need considerable additional definition and regulation.  We should wait until adequate criteria can be established, optimal areas can be identified and agricultural sub-zones designated to better protect the community from noisome nuisances.  We don't allow any kind of housing anyplace in some generalized residential zone.  We subdivide and organize residential land use according to each type's requirements, their social consequences and consistent with the public good.  We should do the same for agricultural uses.

Additionally, I am unconvinced that there is much reason to extend this permitted use to agricultural areas.  It is already allowed in industrial zones.  In point of fact, vacant, underutilized industrial land complete with primary water treatment facilities and access to sewer, roads and rail already exists directly adjacent to Whatcom County's principal rendering service.  Theoretically, zoning changes should address a shortage of land available for a use type.  That is obviously not the case here.

This code exercise commenced upon the realization that Whatcom County's principal slaughter facility was a conditional use and out of compliance.  I agree that some level of facility is essential to benefit consumers and producers of quality local meats.  But opening the entire agricultural zone to slaughter as a permitted use could result in major changes that this amendment does not adequately anticipate.  There are better ways to legitimize a non-compliant facility.  The proposed amendment is figuratively like using a meat axe to solve a problem that really needs a scalpel.

It is in the best interests of the county and the public to delay action and consider revising these provisions to allow for the designation of agricultural sub-zones most likely able to support such facilities without creating environmental problems or public nuisance.  The county should seriously consider an alternative method of remedying the administrative errors underlying this issue and legitimizing existing federally permitted slaughter facilities.

I believe this delay is highly warranted, especially in view of the applicant's record of repeated health violations, notorious scofflaw permit and tax avoidance, and securities fraud in at least two states.

Media reports on problems associated with the applicant:

Feb 2009 - Article describing applicant's health violations

March 2009 - Article describing applicant's health violations as like a murder scene

April 2009 - Article detailing applicant's illegal restaurant and problems with health department and Liquor control board

June 2010 - Controversial split with investors

Legal complaints and orders related to the applicant: - Feb 5, 2004 - Jun 11, 2004 - Oct 21 2004 - Dec 7, 2009 - Mar 22, 2010

Thank you,

Tip Johnson

Related Links:

-> The Application
-> County staff report
-> Wendy Harris' early alert
-> Over at Get Whatcom Planning
-> The Agenda Bill

Tip Johnson  //  Sat, Nov 03, 2012, 6:46 pm

Lest anyone get off on the wrong track, I am neither vegetarian or an animal rights activist.  I like the idea of sustainable local facilities for quality local, and hopefully organic, meats.

For the record, I appreciate and do not oppose the the plans discussed in the following links:

BBJ Article re: North Cascade Meats
+ Link

North Cascade Meats Website
+ Link

Here’s their Business Plan
+ Link

That said, the code amendment as proposed appears to me to expose Whatcom County to some very grave dangers.

Wendy Harris  //  Sat, Nov 03, 2012, 10:08 pm

Thanks, Tip.  Your comments help underscore how poorly analyzed this proposal is.  The County’s “one type fits all kinds of slaughter” approach fails to consider differences in processing needs for cows vs. poultry vs. pigs. vs. sheep vs. mink.

Doug karlberg  //  Mon, Nov 05, 2012, 9:37 am


I luv ya like a brother, but I simply do not understand what you are trying to suggest with your example data about chicken processing.

According to your numbers this hypothetical chicken nugget facility would need over 27,000,000 chickens a year, and would use so much water that the Nooksack would flow backwards from the sea. Hence the term “Chicken of the Sea”

Your chicken example ain’t going to happen at this cattle butchering facility proposed, so I wonder what the real agenda is.

What “could” happen in the future is entirely speculative, as one could peculate anyone doing horrible things in the future. Speculation is not factual. What is factual is the application for a small butchering facility.

The Keizer application is a great example, where they are only using 800 gallons of water per day, and putting out approximately the same in waste. Almost every single piece of the animal is turned into a commercially valuable product, and the waste stream is loaded into a tank truck and processed properly. This waste stream is not laden with heavy metals, pesticides, or carcinogens. For the most part the waste steam is so benign that we often put this composted material back on our gardens and feed our families from it.

I know right about now you are considering flipping e the bird, but wait a minute. I give all the credit to the environmental community for the changes in how food processing plants recycle virtually every once of their relatively benign waste stream into products that we use daily.

My problem is that even when they change some in the environmental community forget how to acknowledge this monumental change that has gone on. This simple acknowledgement goes along ways to endearing future cooperation between the environmental community and industry. An industry which feeds us everyday, reliably and safely.

Some would like to use the argument that this is industrial usage and as such is different than agricultural usage, but this misses the obvious point, which is that this butchering facility provides a market for agricultural products, without which agriculture could not exist. Processing of agricultural products is intimately connected. This is not a shoe factory that can be placed anywhere.

Local food, and especially niche markets of food more wholesome than the truly industrial food processing, is valued by residents of our county, and this facility has the potential to provide this while reducing the carbon footprint of shipping the cows hundreds of miles in diesel burning truck. We cannot have it both ways.

What does bother m though is that niche food processing and marketing does have the potential to increase employment in Whatcom County, and instead of promoting this, we are we are picking this proposal to death, and I don’t see where any of the objections cannot, and have not been adequately dealt with in the past.

Let the USDA, FDA, EPA, and DOE do their job, they are experts. Require that the applicant follow the rules and keep the odors down, and deal with their waste stream properly, and truck it to an approved disposal facility if necessary if there is a septic field issue.

I would not recommend that the County gets into the “business plans” of any land use applicants, nor would I like to see our County use land use regulations to assist any hidden agendas. Anything which would suggest arbitrary rules, or rules which are different for one similar business to another similar business, are just exposing the taxpayer needlessly to legal liability.

Any suggestion that a business locating in Whatcom County is some how responsible for the bad actions of others, needs to be directly and clearly connected to the applicant. I don’t see a single fact based issue that has not been adequately regulated in the past by the County, and I don’t see why this applicant cannot be regulated likewise. I see no overwhelming reason to single this applicant out.

We need to be seen in Whatcom County as being open for business (and jobs), fair to all applicants regardless of whether we like them or not, as long as it is legal, no hidden agendas, and not be arbitrary when considering their proposals.

By the way, it looks like this fella has had some mistakes in the past, who hasn’t, but none of them are convictions for food safety or pollution. I like Dave’s Killer bread, and he went to prison for a long time. Redemption is possible, if given the opportunity.

In the grand scheme of things, the largest polluter in Whatcom County is us. Human sewage and road oil pollution are our largest waste streams we have to deal with. Lake Whatcom is not getting better. Maybe these problems would be a better place to prioritize energy, if we want to make a significant difference.

Attacking a small butchering facility, is truly biting the hand that feeds you, and does not exactly put out a welcome mat for job creators in the broader Whatcom County.

County Hearing Commissioner John Lesow in a previous article on NW Citizen took me to task for not coming to a bunch of hearings on this matter. I guess if you do not attend you are somehow not informed. While I have not attended a bunch of these boring meetings, I have been to a slaughter house, I have seen a Mobile Slaughtering Unit with my own eyes, I have raised cows for slaughter, and I manage and operate a seafood processing facility which processed 500,000 lbs. this last summer and passed a FDA inspection, and have had to become quite familiar with HAACP rules and regulations, which is probably more first hand knowledge than some of the experts have that are making the decisions at government level. I will bet that if Mr. Lesow tried to admonish a appellate court for their not being there at the district court level to hear the evidence first hand, that Appellate Judges point out the error of his logic.

Mr. Lesow somehow equates slaughterhouses with abortion clinics and how people would rather work in an abortion clinic. (nice analogy counselor)

Mr. Lesow bemoans that we only are attracting slaughter house and coal jobs. When people are out of work, especially for long time, they will take anything that is offered. Can you blame them? If we create jobs, this desperation resides.

Whatcom County needs more jobs in total. Increasing the total number of jobs tends to raise the wages of everyone. To increase jobs we need to be more welcoming, within reason, and less petty. The pettiness creates a bad reputation for potential job creators.

Zoning is just artificial lines drawn by people, and unless Moses has signed the drawings then I think the wisdom of these artificial lines should be challenged when it looks like they do not serve our needs. A butchering facility, properly regulated serves our needs for food. Placing a butchering facility near the farm, is common sense. What is next for our nationally recognized cluster of food production in Whatcom County, regulating cottage jam canning businesses.

With 15% of Whatcom County residents living under the Federal Poverty level, each of these potentially twenty jobs would bring twenty people out of poverty. Mr. Lesow has a good jobs, and thinks that this proposal will result in the “mongelization” of Whatcom County. One butcher shop will do this? How about those 27,000,000 chickens coming here by train?

Why is that Whatcom County has such a high level of poverty and low wages when compared to other counties?

Good question, but maybe there is a clue, when it takes this much debate to open a small butchering facility next to a cattle farm.

We all believe in protecting our environment, but we have made huge progress, and even protecting the environment can be taken to extremes. This is a good example of the extreme.

Last, Mr. Lesow chides me on my sophomoric humor. I do this intentionally, as I know that all of these people involved have good intentions, and this is a friendly debate about policy.

I use the humor to bring us all back to a chuckle together.

So in this spirit, Tip, the chickens have come home to rest, and you can now flip me the bird.

Tip Johnson  //  Mon, Nov 05, 2012, 10:23 am

Flip you the bird, Bro?  Heck, I largely agree with you, but I think there may be a burr under your saddle and you have taken off on a stampede.

Perhaps you missed the part where I said I don’t oppose the actual proposal AND I think we need adequate facilities to help local farmers produce quality local meats.

But the Council is painting with too broad a brush.  All I ask is that they consider identifying areas best suited to support such activities. What’s wrong with that?

I even agree that zoning is often more of a problem than the solution, but it does do a good job of keeping rendering plants and schools apart.  Why couldn’t it do a good job of keeping slaughter houses and rendering plants together and both away from churches and schools?

I’ll repeat:  I think small scale slaughter for quality local meats is good.  We could even encourage super high standards and promote a Whatcom brand - even with chickens if we think ahead.  But the ordinance as written is so full of holes, that someone like Tyson could come to exploit cheap land and spur a major, unintended transformation of a lot of county land.  What’s so good about that?

Essentially, as I requested, the County needs to slow down and take a closer look.  I didn’t make up those chicken numbers.  Read the document.  The county is trying too simple an approach to a complicated market.  They need a more sophisticated and nuanced ordinance.

And I never suggested getting involved with anyone’s business plan.  Let’s just not create an opportunity for business that is known to be socially and environmentally destructive, a risk to public health and a constant nuisance to the good people living in the county.

BTW, as a junior high and high school student, a common summer job was running into the sheds, grabbing handfuls of worn out layers and stuffing them into Campbell soup trucks.  It was a God-awful mess and literally a terrible horror. 

Doug karlberg  //  Mon, Nov 05, 2012, 11:07 am

No problemo Tip,

I know that you did not make up the numbers.

Stand alone rendering plants are not the same size scope, or process when a butchering facility “renders” its waste. Unfortunately it is an emotionally charged word, and one has to discern the true nature of what is being proposed, and the indiscriminate use of the word without factual context can inflame people.

Here is the definition.

Rendering is a process that converts waste animal tissue into stable, value-added materials. Rendering can refer to any processing of animal products into more useful materials, or more narrowly to the rendering of whole animal fatty tissue into purified fats like lard or tallow. Rendering can be carried out on an industrial, farm, or kitchen scale.

What we are talking about is farm scale in nature and not industrial in nature. This is also true of the butchering facility.

The best place for a cattle butchering facility is close to the farm. Small scale rendering close to the butchering operation ensure the least odor, and the freshest products.

I accept some odors from farms, as a price I am more than willing to pay for my food.

Whatcom County is having some good paying jobs dangled in front of its nose by the coal proponents and it is attractive to some, because these jobs are needed and relatively high paying jobs. Whatcom County has a long history of low paying jobs, which mostly a function of poor economic development by government, and a heavy reliance on (clean) retail and hospitality. Agriculture now pays higher wages than many of the retail jobs. At least this “dirty” industry feeds us.

I did not know that this butchering facility was going to be placed next to schools and churches. I guess I missed this in the application.

There is hardly an industry that has not had a bad environmental record to change in today’s environment, and most have done a good job of changing. I like to purchase my meat from the small butchering facilities, and I have not seen any socially destructive goings on there.

Dangerous ground to see one place in business with permits, and another who cannot get permits for the exact same business, under the same conditions. Lawyers love this stuff, and taxpayers pay the price for selective regulation and selective enforcement, especially if the ground for this picking winners and losers is arbitrary and capricious.

Well my fine feathered friend, enough squawking for now.

Tip Johnson  //  Mon, Nov 05, 2012, 1:25 pm

One more squawk. 

If the County intends to implement a policy of creating a lot of nice slaughter jobs and business revenue from a new slaughter industry in Whatcom County, then this is the ordinance for you.  Great, maybe we can wash off the coal dust with blood before we go deposit checks from our new jobs in the bank.

The way the ordinance is written has the potential to completely change the rural character of Whatcom County. 

If someone decides they can build a chicken slaughter line or two or three or however many, then the ordinance requires that of the the 27, 54, 80 or however many million birds are needed, half will have to be raised in Whatcom County.

Let’s say some big company with a history of shipping frozen chickens to Russia decided they could amass a huge real estate empire building coops and slaughters and fill ships with birds grown right here in Whatcom County.  Hey, that’s business, but is it the business we want Whatcom County known for?

It’s potentially a lot of birds, applied throughout the Agricultural zone, a lot of new buildings and a lot of impacts.  Sure, it’s probably good for the economy in the short term until others’ real estate values are considered.

As written, the ordinance does nothing to insure facilities are farm-based and small scale.  It opens the door to exploitation of our economic tractability and could wreak vast changes to people’s way of life.

That at least deserves some community consultation.  I don’t see any of that in the public record.

John Lesow  //  Tue, Nov 06, 2012, 10:57 pm


your final—and previous—comments are well considered and shed additional light on a difficult subject; one that has garnered a lot of attention from a County government that is trying to strike a balance between supporting Ag and maintaining some semblance of quality of life for County residents. 

Doug, I appreciate your empirical experience, but fish processing and slaughtering on Ag are two separate subjects and the ramifications are different.  That is why attending these “boring” meetings is necessary to get a handle on the issue.  Personally, I don’t find these meetings boring, and I have attended over 200 during my 8 years on the Planning Commission.  They never cease to fascinate me, and I will miss them when my term is up next month.

As far as your Appellate vs. District Court argument is concerned, I fail to grasp your logic or admit to any errors in mine.  Besides, yours is a straw man argument and misses the point of Ms. Harris’ original article.  The present proposal before Council fails to recognize the complications of rendering and slaughter on the same site, as well as use of a scarce resource (water) for an industrial activity.  Plus the problems of waste disposal without the benefit of a sanitary sewer.  She makes a good case that the proposal should not be passed in it’s present form. 

Abortion clinics and slaughterhouses are both legal, so if your expressed concern is for “jobs” why differentiate the two?  Casinos are legal, so why not locate them on Ag land and give the farmer, the prospective employees and the economy in general a boost?  Drinking establishments on Ag provide good jobs for County residents.  The Northwood Casino is a convenient example.

The fact is that the proposal under consideration will amount to an upzone from Ag to Industrial throughout the County.  Will ag land be taxed at a higher value due to the presence of a slaughterhouse?  Will Rural lands be next?  One of the deficiencies of the County Comp Plan is that it fails to make the distinction between activities that are “rural” and what amounts to “exurban”.

Whatcom County is being mongrelized from bad land use decisions. We have been in violation of the Growth Management Act for years and continue to be. I have not lived here as long as you and Tip, but I do recall talking to the late Sharon Roy about the abundance of fish and in the streams and waterways around the county when she was growing up.  And the robust oyster farms in the bays when they were not contaminated like they are today.  You can’t lay all the blame on road runoff and failing septics.  Agricultural practices, past and present, have degraded our waterways, too.  Allowing industrial uses on Ag land will accelerate this degradation.

I enjoy a good joke, but the comments directed towards Ms. Harris, particularly the characterization as another ivory tower intellectual, were more denigrating than funny and detracted from what I considered a responsible viewpoint on a potentially irresponsible proposal.  One that Council will likely endorse, despite the unintended consequences of allowing slaughter and rendering on Ag as a permitted use, one that is not allowed in neighboring counties.

Tip Johnson  //  Thu, Nov 08, 2012, 9:50 pm

Mr. Lesow,

I expect you may be the only one with the will to plow all the way through this.  I have it all on tape and it is a rich lode to mine.  I am sure we will be in touch.  This single sleeping issue could be the undoing of many a political career!

The most telling comment I received from a county council member was, “Oh come on, there used to be slaughterhouses and rendering plants all over the county.”  Later in the conversation, they admitted that the county also used to be filled with chicken farms.

Seriously, do they have any idea why that’s not true today?  There is a reason slaughter and rendering are restricted to the industrial zone…actually, very many reasons.  Mainly, they are offensive.  There are reasons factory chicken farms have consolidated into areas with adequate facilities.  There are reasons slaughter facilities get larger and larger. The Council is so intent, they are insensitive to these facts.

The Council admitted they had never even considered chicken production in their valiant effort to make the entire county accessible to an applicant with a history of scofflaw behavior hoping to scam local farmers with the promise of adding value to the slaughter business by rendering conventional wastes into edible products.  I have his spreadsheet if anyone is interested.  The whole benefit of the business plan is based on the supposed value of rendering animal waste into food.  It could be dog food.  Council members discussed but refrained from adding a qualification that such products be strictly for human consumption.  Council members were instead concerned that it might be too easy for neighbors to complain about a farmer or their so-called ancillary agricultural uses.  They joked about how it might even smell good, “Like a Barbecue”, suggested both Mann and Crawford. 

At literally the last minute, Brenner did raise the chicken question, mentioning my recent submittals.  She was completely ignored.  Crawford advised that she could vote against the measure, which she did. Mann admitted that, as of Wednesday, he had not read correspondence delivered to the Council on Sunday, and opined as how he wasn’t worried about it.  He said the County would deal with it if it became a problem.  To her credit, Brenner rightly advised that it would be too late by that time.  Yet, she still supports a less restrictive ordinance.

One key to the County measure is that the meaning of the term “ancillary” is not the same as generally used in the code.  Usually, an ancillary use is secondary to the primary use of a specific property, so a property would need to be raising animals to have a slaughterhouse.  Not so under the newly framed proposal. The council has decided that for the purposes of this code, “ancillary” will mean related to any use in the Agricultural zone.  But it gets even better for the slaughter industry!

Other policies are designed to prevent non-Ag uses from displacing agricultural uses. Council probed staff in depth to assure themselves that as long as no agricultural use was present, then none could be deemed displaced, thus triggering policies that might inhibit the building of slaughterhouses.  Thus, farmers can bulldoze their berries, or leave fields fallow to show that no agricultural use is present before applying to build slaughterhouse facilities on any agricultural land.  Brilliant!

After an hour and a half of the most inane, irrational and poorly informed discussion imaginable, they voted 4-2 in favor of moving the measure ahead.  4-2?  Should that give us hope?  No!  Brenner and Knudsen both opposed, objecting that the measure was too restrictive, even as it opens the entire AG zone to industry.  Brenner and Knudsen repeatedly stressed that it should be an outright permitted use, not an accessory use even under the zone-wide definition.  Also, they objected to the idea that any non-farming neighbor might be able to complain that such an operation affected the use and enjoyment of their property.

I predict, if the Council prevails, that taxes on Ag land will have to be raised to Industrial rates after residential properties lose half their value.  Where does the Council think their tax base resides?  Farms all get a super-hefty agricultural discount.  It’s the “gentlemen farmers”, the estates, the Fincas if you will, the single family homes and even double-wides that really pay the freight.  Does anyone really believe these properties will be bought and sold at the same rates with the specter of slaughterhouses and rendering plants next door?  No one even has to build one.

It’s absurd, yet it surges ahead, virtually every Council member in favor of either this or a less restrictive measure. This is the kind of issue that can really make some rain.  Who does the Council think will rise to their defense?  Not even most farmers will want a rendering facility or slaughterhouse next door.

Charter Review and District Only Voting

Thu, Apr 17, 2014, 9:40 am  //  Riley Sweeney

A simple explanation of the Charter Review and analysis of District only voting


Roosevelt Neighborhood Pleads for Left Turns

Wed, Apr 09, 2014, 8:07 am  //  Riley Sweeney

City pushes for Alabama Street improvements, residents speak out

3 comments; last on Apr 14, 2014

Paper Dreams in Fairhaven

Next door to Village Books


Sun, Apr 06, 2014, 3:29 pm  //  Guest writer

By Christopher Grannis: Wherein despite every effort and expense, citizens cannot make the City follow the law or work for neighborhoods

2 comments; last on Apr 07, 2014

Killer Industrial Jobs or Long-term Job Killers?

Sun, Apr 06, 2014, 11:52 am  //  Terry Wechsler

Why commenting on the EIS in Comp Plan revisions for Cherry Point means demanding an EIS in the first place.

4 comments; last on Apr 13, 2014

Anatomy of a Development Part XII - Citizens Win Against University Ridge

Wed, Apr 02, 2014, 5:00 am  //  Dick Conoboy

Ambling University Development Group pulls out. University Ridge will not be built.

12 comments; last on Apr 06, 2014

Tell County To Expand Scope of EIS Review for Plants and Animals

Tue, Apr 01, 2014, 12:27 pm  //  Wendy Harris

Please help us protect county wildlife by ensuring that the scope of the EIS review is adequate. A sample scoping letter is included.


Public May Comment On EIS Scoping For County Comp. Plan Until April 7th

Mon, Mar 31, 2014, 1:23 am  //  Wendy Harris

The public has a week to comment on the scope of issues reviewed under the EIS.


My State of the Lake Report for 2014

Fri, Mar 28, 2014, 12:32 am  //  Wendy Harris

On March 26, 2014 the city and county provided their update and assessment on the status of Lake Whatcom. This is mine.

2 comments; last on Apr 01, 2014

County Considers Purchasing Toxic Property

Wed, Mar 19, 2014, 9:32 am  //  Riley Sweeney

Riley digs into the county's plan to buy the county morgue

3 comments; last on Mar 24, 2014

Propaganda Replaces Public Information:  An Analysis of the Lake Whatcom TDML Process

Sun, Mar 16, 2014, 11:52 pm  //  Wendy Harris

The public is not provided with a proposed plan or adequate information prior to the annual "state of the lake" meeting

4 comments; last on Mar 18, 2014

Mobile Slaughter

Sat, Mar 15, 2014, 12:11 pm  //  Tip Johnson

Wherein there's a crackdown on growing plants, and plans to let slaughter run free

2 comments; last on Mar 16, 2014

Fukushima Radiation Found In Canada

Fri, Mar 14, 2014, 9:47 am  //  John Servais

Fukushima radiation has been found 20 miles from Whatcom County farmland along the Fraser River in British Columbia.

1 comments; last on Mar 17, 2014

Is ALEC Jr. Coming to Whatcom County or Bellingham Soon?

Wed, Mar 12, 2014, 7:28 am  //  Dick Conoboy

The infamous American Legislative Exchange Council plans to send its spawn to cities and counties throughout the U.S.

1 comments; last on Mar 24, 2014

Rep. Vincent Buys Appears to Break State Fundraising Laws

Tue, Mar 11, 2014, 10:24 am  //  Riley Sweeney

Riley catches State Rep. Vincent Buys for soliciting funds during session


County Hires GPT Permit Lead as Senior Planner

Mon, Mar 10, 2014, 9:51 am  //  Riley Sweeney

Riley digs into an unusual hiring decision at the County Planning Dept

1 comments; last on Mar 10, 2014

Whatcom Watch Editor Resigns

Sun, Mar 02, 2014, 2:22 pm  //  John Servais

The editor of the Whatcom Watch, Richard Jehn, has resigned effective today. Chalk up a victory for Craig Cole and Pacific International Terminals.

8 comments; last on Mar 05, 2014

Relevant Documents to Libel Threat

Tue, Feb 25, 2014, 8:29 pm  //  John Servais

The full text of Craig Cole's threatening letter of libel against the Whatcom Watch. And the emptiness of the threat.

16 comments; last on Mar 20, 2014

Action Alert for Tonight: Waterfront Wildlife and Habitat Not Being Protected as Promised

Mon, Feb 24, 2014, 3:33 pm  //  Wendy Harris

We were led to believe the city would review waterfront wildlife and habitat connectivity. It turns out that the city intends to focus only on nearshore fish.


Wendy Harris on Citizen Journalism

Sat, Feb 22, 2014, 12:16 am  //  Wendy Harris

Accepting the Paul deArmond award of citizen journalism on Feb 7, Wendh Harris gave this speech. We think it deserves its own post.


Craig Cole Threatens Libel Suit

Wed, Feb 19, 2014, 4:48 pm  //  John Servais

Craig Cole, the local contact for the proposed Cherry Point coal port has threatened the Whatcom Watch with a libel lawsuit.

6 comments; last on Mar 20, 2014

Do Changing Liquor and Marijuana Laws Affect DUIs

Mon, Feb 17, 2014, 7:26 am  //  Riley Sweeney

Riley digs through court data and discovers the real impact of privatization and legalization


Bellingham Seeks “Flexibility” To Sell Wholesale Rural Sewer Services

Sun, Feb 09, 2014, 9:35 pm  //  Wendy Harris

The mayor wants to amend a city law to increase flexibility for a GMA provision that should be used rarely, if ever at all.

3 comments; last on Feb 11, 2014

The Hidden Costs of Costco

Sun, Feb 09, 2014, 2:36 pm  //  Wendy Harris

Costco imposes indirect costs on our community that are as real and tangible as road construction expenses.

1 comments; last on Feb 13, 2014

Reid Boiler Works Burns Down

Sun, Feb 09, 2014, 9:13 am  //  John Servais

The old empty Reid Boiler Works industrial building in Fairhaven burned to the ground Saturday night.


Panem et Circenses - Why I Did Not Watch “The Super Bowl”

Mon, Feb 03, 2014, 5:30 am  //  Dick Conoboy

Professional and even college sports have morphed into a circus of corporate greed and the fleecing of the public.

3 comments; last on Mar 01, 2014

Have You Exceeded Your Right To Information?

Sat, Feb 01, 2014, 12:35 am  //  Wendy Harris

Filing a public record request could land a citizen in jail under a proposal reflected in a Herald opinion article.

2 comments; last on Feb 03, 2014

Wendy Harris Receives deArmond Award for Citizen Journalism

Wed, Jan 29, 2014, 6:18 am  //  Guest writer

Tim Johnson writes about the first recipient of the Paul deArmond Citizen Journalism award, Whatcom County writer Wendy Harris.

3 comments; last on Feb 08, 2014

Anatomy of a Development Part XI - The Doldrums at University Ridge

Mon, Jan 20, 2014, 5:14 am  //  Dick Conoboy

The developers of University Ridge have been silent since shortly after the hearing examiner's decision on 23 October last year. Will they walk?


The Marijuana Bowl

Sun, Jan 19, 2014, 8:39 pm  //  John Servais

Super Bowl ... Weed Bowl ... This bud's for you ... Bong Bowl ... Marijuana Bowl ... whatever. It is on!

1 comments; last on Jan 20, 2014

Port’s Alternative Marina Analysis a Scam

Tue, Jan 14, 2014, 2:19 pm  //  Guest writer

Do we actually need to say that we, as citizens, want accurate information from government officials?

1 comments; last on Jan 14, 2014

City too Poor for Power Pennies or Discrimination?

Fri, Dec 27, 2013, 4:00 am  //  Guest writer

Guest writer Barbara Perry writes about Bellingham Parks refusal to allow motorized wheel chairs to recharge at public electrical outlets.

6 comments; last on Jan 03, 2014

Port Memo Addresses Marina Fraud Allegations

Fri, Dec 20, 2013, 3:56 pm  //  Wendy Harris

A Port of Bellingham internal memo tries, but fails, to justify changes in cost estimates for alternative marina sites.

5 comments; last on Dec 22, 2013

Lummi Influence Over the Waterfront Planning Process Continues to Grow

Tue, Dec 17, 2013, 12:21 am  //  Wendy Harris

Army Corps advised DOE that it will not issue a waterfront permit without Lummi approval

2 comments; last on Jan 13, 2014

Gary Jensen Not Running for State Senate

Mon, Dec 16, 2013, 12:30 pm  //  John Servais

Ferndale Mayor Gary Jensen has decided not to file for the 42nd state Senate seat currently held by Doug Ericksen.

5 comments; last on Dec 24, 2013

Larrabee School; Its Future

Mon, Dec 09, 2013, 12:24 pm  //  Guest writer

Barbara Perry writes about the closed nature of the Bellingham School Board on the future of the Larrabee School.

1 comments; last on Dec 15, 2013

Steal this Waterfront: Costs without Benefit

Sat, Dec 07, 2013, 8:23 pm  //  Tip Johnson

Wherein the direct, indirect, hidden and lost opportunity costs make this a waterfront boondoggle of billions

3 comments; last on Dec 11, 2013

On Monday, City Council Votes “third and final” Approval of Waterfront Plan

Sat, Dec 07, 2013, 12:33 pm  //  Wendy Harris

Local activist calls on Bellingham City Council to table the unpopular waterfront plans and engage in meaningful public process

2 comments; last on Dec 08, 2013

Lecture on County Water Issues Draws Crowd

Fri, Dec 06, 2013, 11:03 pm  //  Wendy Harris

The county will be required to consider water quality and water quantity when planning rural growth.

3 comments; last on Dec 10, 2013

Video Exposes City Council Dysfunction on Waterfront Plan

Thu, Dec 05, 2013, 11:58 am  //  John Servais

The Political Junkie has posted a 3 minute video showing Bellingham City Council members explaining their idiocy for all of us to watch.

2 comments; last on Dec 06, 2013

The Bellingham “Riot” - Let’s Expand the Conversation

Thu, Dec 05, 2013, 5:00 am  //  Dick Conoboy

The post "riot" conversation is terribly lacking in several areas. We must expand the discussion or risk learning little from the experience.

3 comments; last on Dec 15, 2013

Cascadia Weekly Blasts Waterfront Plan

Wed, Dec 04, 2013, 10:53 am  //  John Servais

Bellingham City Council and Port of Bellingham finalize the waterfront plan. In his weekly Gristle, Tim Johnson blasts the corrupt public process.

4 comments; last on Dec 05, 2013

Waterfront Development Bonus Yet Another Bad Idea

Sat, Nov 30, 2013, 8:11 pm  //  Wendy Harris

The waterfront plan allows a development bonus for payments made to the Lake Whatcom land acquisition fund

1 comments; last on Dec 01, 2013

City and Port Ready To Act on Waterfront Plan

Fri, Nov 29, 2013, 9:43 pm  //  Wendy Harris

A number of important issues need to be resolved before waterfront planning is complete, but the city council and port commission are ready to act.

2 comments; last on Nov 30, 2013

Port Unable To Protect Public Safety

Fri, Nov 22, 2013, 9:01 pm  //  Wendy Harris

If the port can not construct the airport safely, should it be entrusted with dangerous waterfront cleanup work?


Walmart and McDonald’s - Partners in Institutionalized Cluelessness

Wed, Nov 20, 2013, 5:03 am  //  Dick Conoboy

The advice coming from Walmart and McDonald's to its low paid employees becomes more and more bizarre and inane.


Anatomy of a Development - Part X Appeals of the Hearing Examiner’s Decision

Tue, Nov 19, 2013, 5:35 am  //  Dick Conoboy

Ambling's motion to the hearing examiner for reconsideration was definitively rejected. The developer has not met the deadline for an appeal to the Superior Court


Smoking Gun: Fraud and Deception

Mon, Nov 18, 2013, 2:18 pm  //  Guest writer

In which we find the hidden core of the waterfront plan is rotten through and through

7 comments; last on Nov 21, 2013

County Releases EIS, Prepares to Purchase Jail Site

Mon, Nov 18, 2013, 10:59 am  //  Riley Sweeney

The county takes two big steps forward on the new jail, while still missing the point


Noballmacare and Setting the False Standard

Thu, Nov 14, 2013, 1:39 am  //  Tip Johnson

Dear Mr. President, There's a sucker born every minute, and two to take him.

7 comments; last on Nov 21, 2013

City Council Misled On Waterfront Planning

Wed, Nov 13, 2013, 3:16 pm  //  Wendy Harris

The city adminstration has been providing misleading/ incorrect information to the city council to avoid waterfront plan revisions.

1 comments; last on Nov 18, 2013

Election Analysis: What Happened with the Port Races?

Tue, Nov 12, 2013, 10:21 am  //  Riley Sweeney

Riley crunches the numbers on Renata and McAuley's races to find answers

2 comments; last on Nov 13, 2013

Puget Neighborhood Likely New Home for 1,300 Students

Tue, Nov 12, 2013, 5:16 am  //  Dick Conoboy

Puget Neighborhood will likely have in the immediate future 1,300 new rental units that will be marketed primarily to the student population.


Gloomy Fate For Waterfront Wildlife

Sat, Nov 09, 2013, 9:47 pm  //  Wendy Harris

The COB administration continues in its refusal to analyze waterfront wildlife issues, even though this is a prerequisite step in protecting wildlife from the impacts of development

3 comments; last on Nov 10, 2013

Election Results - November 2013

Tue, Nov 05, 2013, 8:21 pm  //  John Servais

With lots of outside county money flowing in to our local races, this election is weird. But real - and we county residents have spoken.

11 comments; last on Nov 09, 2013

Health Insurance Scams - Washington Not Spared

Mon, Nov 04, 2013, 9:55 am  //  Dick Conoboy

The call of the dollar speaks more loudly to health insurance companies than does the voice and well-being of the consumer, even here in Washington.

8 comments; last on Nov 06, 2013

Anatomy of a Development - Part IX BMC Rule of Three Thwarts Plans

Thu, Oct 31, 2013, 10:19 am  //  Dick Conoboy

Four bedroom dorm rooms have been nixed by the hearing examiner. University Ridge may be in trouble as a cash cow for Ambling Development of Georgia

3 comments; last on Nov 04, 2013

The Slaughterhouse Referendum - Citizens Opposing Widespread Slaughter (COWS)

Mon, Oct 28, 2013, 10:19 pm  //  Tip Johnson

Wherein we discover why we exert our rights - and grab some more petitions before it's too late

3 comments; last on Nov 06, 2013

Dick’s Picks for City Council - Burr and Petree

Mon, Oct 28, 2013, 12:00 am  //  Dick Conoboy

Independent voters are for independent thinkers on the city council. Vote for Burr and Petree.


Boulevard Park Reopens

Sat, Oct 26, 2013, 7:36 pm  //  John Servais

Beach reconstruction is done at Boulevard Park on the Bellingham waterfront. Paths along shore are again open - and it looks good.

6 comments; last on Nov 01, 2013

Ken Bell and Renata for Port

Sun, Oct 20, 2013, 7:07 pm  //  John Servais

Ken Bell has my vote over Mike McAuley for port commissioner. And Renata Kowalczyk has it over Dan Robbins.

8 comments; last on Oct 30, 2013


New Links

Julia Ioffe/New Republic
the Oatmeal

Current Interest

Community Wise Bellingham
Friends of Whatcom
Guardian Unlimited
Lummi Island Quarry
Reconveyance Challenge
Whatcom Elections

Publisher Recommended

Guardian Unlimited
League of Women Voters
Paul Krugman - economics
Sweeney Politics

Local Blogs & News

Bellingham Herald
Bham Herald Politics Blog
Bham Politics & Economics
Bob Sanders
Cascadia Weekly
Citizen Ted
Ferndale Record
Friends of Whatcom
Get Whatcom Planning
Jack Petree
Latte Republic
League of Women Voters
Lynden Tribune
Northern Light
Sweeney Politics
Twilight Zoning
Wally Wonders
Western Front - WWU
Whatcom Watch

Local Causes

Bellingham Police Activity
Chuckanut Community Forest
Chuckanut Mountains
Citizens of Bellingham
City Club of Bellingham
Community Wise Bellingham
Conservation NW
Cordata & Meridian
Facebook Port Reform
Futurewise - Whatcom
Lake Whatcom
Lummi Island Quarry
N. Cascades Audubon
NW Holocaust Center
RE Sources
Reconveyance Challenge
Reduce Jet Noise
Salish Sea Org.
Save the Granary Building
Transition Whatcom
WA Conservation Voters


Port of Bellingham
Skagit County
US - The White House
WA State Access
WA State Elections
WA State Legislature
Whatcom Auditor
Whatcom County
Whatcom Elections

Weather & Climate

Cliff Mass Weather Blog
Climate Audit
NW Radar
Two day forecast
Watts Up With That? - climate


Adventures NW
Edge of Sports
Entertainment NNW
Famous Internet Skiers
Sailing Anarchy

Good Links

Al-Jazeera online
Alaska Dispatch
Arab News
Asia Times
Atlantic, The
Common Dreams
Crosscut Seattle
Daily Kos
Daily Mirror
Drudge Report
Foreign Policy in Focus
Guardian Unlimited
Gulf News
Huffington Post
Innocence Project, The
Intrnational Herald Tribune
James Fallows
Jerusalem Post
Joel Connelly
Juan Cole
Julia Ioffe/New Republic
Le Diplo
Media Matters
Michael Moore
Middle East Times
Nation, The
New American Century
News Trust
Online Journal
Palestine Daily
Palestine News
Paul Krugman - economics
Personal bio info
Portland Indy Media
Progressive Review
Project Vote Smart
Sea Shepherd
Talking Points Memo
the Oatmeal
War and Piece
Washington Votes

NwCitizen 1995 - 2007

Early Northwest Citizen

Internet At Its Best


Quiet, Offline or Dead

Bellingham Register
Carl Weimer
David Hackworth
N. Sound Conservancy
No Leaky Buckets
Northwest Review
Post-Oklahoman Confessions
Protect Bellingham Parks
The American Telegraph
The Crisis Papers