County Moves Forward On Slaughter/Rendering Facility Proposal

Permalink +

Thu, Nov 01, 2012, 12:45 am  //  Wendy Harris

The county is moving forward with its proposal to site slaughterhouses and rendering plants on agricultural land, although such facilities are already allowed in industrial zones.  The council will be discussing this matter during a Special Committee of the Whole meeting on November 7, 2012, and could approve the ordinance that evening.

The proposal will allow slaughter facilities, which are defined to include “incidental edible rendering,” as a permitted use where a facility is no larger than 15,000 square feet, employs 20 or fewer employees, and processes at least 50% of agricultural products produced in Whatcom County.  Larger facilities are treated as a conditional use, which requires approval from the development-friendly County Hearings Examiner.  The proposal will allow slaughter and rendering facilities as a primary use, i.e., a use that is independent of a farm operation.

Previously, I posted concerns about siting slaughterhouses on farm land, but I did not address rendering facilities.  Rendering involves processing dead animals into ingredients for a wide range of industrial and consumer goods, such as pet food, soaps, candles, pharmaceuticals, personal care products, and tallow and lard consumed by humans.  Because rendering facilities are currently a conditional use, and this proposal will make “small” rendering facilities a permitted use, it is a deregulation.

After attending the council’s October 9, 2012 Planning Committee, I do not believe council has sufficient understanding of the rendering industry to deregulate rendering facilities.  Council did not know the approximate size of a “small scale” facility, and determined it was under 15,000 square foot based on the applicant’s self-serving testimony and the size of the county’s sole slaughter facility.  Ditto for the number of permitted employees.  The proposed definition of rendering fails to reflect a multitude of rendering byproducts.

Although the council did not understand exactly what rendering plants did, or how they operated, they ignored objections by the Northwest Clean Air Agency regarding odor and air quality impacts.  They deemed it sufficient to restrict rendering operations to edible byproducts, which produce less odor and pollution than inedible rendering byproducts.  Again, they relied upon the applicant for important information.

The rendering industry recognizes two classifications of processing plants: integrated and independent.  An integrated rendering plant is generally operated in conjunction with a meat packing plant, and is located on site and works in tandem with either a slaughterhouse or a poultry processing plant.  Integrated rendering plants can produce both edible and inedible byproducts in the same facility, although the processes are separated.  

Independent rendering plants operate separately from a slaughter facility and collect and process “4D” animals (dead, diseased, dying or disabled,) from a variety of sources such as farms, slaughterhouses, zoos, shelters, veterinary clinics, grocery stores, and road kill.  Independent rendering plants only process inedible byproducts. 

Because the county ordinance restricts rendering facilities to edible byproducts, (i.e, an integrated processing plant,) the rendering plant will likely be associated with a slaughterhouse.  It does not appear that council understood this nuance.  It is unclear if the limitations on facility size and number of employees applies to the entire integrated rendering facility/slaughterhouse, or if this permits two 15,000 square foot buildings and 40 employees per operation/site.  

The county continues to ignore the environmental impacts of slaughter and rendering facilities, treating this as a matter that is magically resolved elsewhere in the permitting process.  This is an important issue that needs to be understood and addressed before new regulations are enacted.

The sheer volume of waste produced by the slaughter industry is daunting. Rendering plants collect approximately 100 million pounds of dead or dying animal remains EVERY DAY.  Because the county will not be rendering “inedible" byproducts, how will these remains be disposed of? State disposal methods are confusing and vary depending on the type of animal and the circumstances surrounding death, but can include burial, composting, rendering, landfill, incineration, or natural decomposition. The complexity and importance of dealing with animal disposal is reflected in a 2004 letter from the Washington State Department of Agriculture to the FDA regarding safety protocols for mad cow disease.  http://www.fda.gov/OHRMS/DOCKETS/dockets/02n0273/02n-0273-c000487-vol40.pdf

For off-site disposal, considerations include increases in traffic and road infrastructure necessary for daily removal of large volumes of waste. For on-site disposal, council should review potential land and water contamination issues, infectious disease and public safety concerns, and the ability of rural septic systems to handle high volumes of slaughter industry waste.

Given the problems created by this proposal, I again urge the county council to consider the use of mobile slaughtering units as an alternative to slaughter and rendering facilities on natural resource land.

Doug Karlberg  //  Thu, Nov 01, 2012, 3:54 pm

Wendy,

With all due respect you are trying to inflame people. Your statement that “Rendering plants collect 100 million pounds of dead or dying animal remains EVERYDAY”

This is not a crime, but a public service.

Thank goodness that someone is picking up the mess for us.

If we closed all rendering plants in the US, leaving 100,000,000 pounds of dead animals EVERYDAY in the streets, could I give out your phone umber to those folks who would like to contact you?

In all seriousness, cleaning up our local waste prevents the spread of disease, and ifs a good thing to do.

Your outrage at the inclusion of a rendering plant associated with a slaughterhouse, is misplaced. Immediate rendering of the animal byproducts from a butcher shop is only a good sanitary practice. Rendering immediately after butchering REDUCES odors, not increases them.

A slaughterhouse of this size is only a butcher shop on steroids, which used to be in every grocery store. One difference is though a USDA inspected slaughterhouse is kept to HIGHER standards than a butcher shop, because it’s volume attracts inspectors and is assessed a higher risk score.

Last to your suggestion of using mobile slaughtering units, which are properly named MSU’s. I know something about these, as these were used when I was kid to butcher the cows we raised for food. These MSUs pull into your field, shoot the cow, and immediately cut their throats, and let the animal bleed out on the ground in a large puddle. Then the cow is hung and gutted. The guts and blood are left on the ground, while the MSU drives away with the meat and hide.

Some how I don’t see these MSU’s as being more environmentally friendly or sanitary then the alternative of bringing the cow into a sanitary facility, butchering them and disposing of their waste in approved fashion by rendering their byproducts.

Growing up in Whatcom County we had lots of these slaughterhouses around. Maybe you don’t remember them, but I can think of four of them, and I don’t remember any of them as being bad neighbors. One of them was right in town, and we sure did like getting our food direct from these slaughterhouses. The meat seemed better direct from the butcher.

You may remember that Freise Hide and Tallow was downtown for years. Right next to the Upfront Theater. Perfectly legal land use, but is that what you really want?

PS: You are not by any chance a vegetarian?


Jack Petree  //  Thu, Nov 01, 2012, 3:56 pm

Imagine the gall of those people, allowing agricultural processing facilities on agricultural land.  Next they’ll be allowing raspberry processing and apple jack making facilities…or…gasp…milking parlors…


Wendy Harris  //  Thu, Nov 01, 2012, 9:27 pm

These comments miss the point of my post, which is that the County Council is deregulating rendering plants as a permitted use without understanding the consequences. 

In a well-intended attempt to limit odor and air pollution, Council is proposing that any rendering of inedible byproducts be prohibited, but failed to consider the problem this creates with regard to disposing of waste remains. In fact, they seemed unaware of the extraordinary volume of waste generated by the slaughter industry and issues of off-site vs. on-site disposal. They did not appreciate the potential health risks created by slaughter waste (hence my reference to the state ag. letter regarding mad cow disease and disposal problems.)

Slaughter begets two industrial processes.. meat processing and rendering.  Council did not understand the relationship between slaughterhouses and rendering plants or the difference between integrated rendering plants and independent rendering plants.  This has resulted in proposal ambiguity. Perhaps they should not be relying so heavily on information provided by the applicant.

Moreover, Council has refused to address hard questions regarding environmental impacts and water availability. It is irresponsible to allow industrial business in ag. land,(which is already permitted in the rural industrial zone) without resolving these concerns.

I want to see our ag. land generate food, not dangerous industrial waste. This proposal takes us in the wrong direction and reflects pro-development ideology rather than sound analysis.


Wendy Harris  //  Thu, Nov 01, 2012, 9:34 pm

And Doug, I see nothing wrong with questioning whether the amount of meat we consume as a society is sustainable.  It takes 40 gallons of water to produce one pound of beef, and water is a precious and dwindling commodity.


Doug Karlberg  //  Fri, Nov 02, 2012, 12:00 pm

Using land use laws to promote a personal disgust with the beef industry, is inappropriate. The land use laws were never written to take on personal vendettas against the beef industry.

The environmental catastrophe is just a hysterical argument, without factual basis.

First it was Hormel and the mega-slaughterhouse, then it was importing of cows from Skagit or BC (the crime of crimes), and then it was rendering of animals, and now you are suggesting that the land use applicant will pollute our air or water without any significant evidence that the applicant has abused the water or air in the past.

All the while you cannot admit that your job killing efforts hurt real people who are suffering without jobs. To be unemployed is a terrible privation, one that eats at the soul and spirit as well as the body.

Your efforts have produced harm to real people who need jobs to survive, and you do so from an intellectual tower on high.

I visited the UW law library once and there were seven stories of bookcases eight feet high, filled with laws that we are required to follow. Either we are incredibly stupid and could not function as a society, or the intellectuals are grabbing power to organize our lives in the “proper” fashion.

I wonder how much freedom is left after we follow all the laws. Maybe we should prune a few, which do not enrich our lives, or give people credit for being smart enough to direct their own lives without so much intervention.

It should not be a crime in Whatcom County to create jobs, and people who have jobs should not have so much say over what jobs are created, as long as the jobs are legal, and hey follow the pollution control laws already in place.

This slaughter house is of the same scale that Whatcom County has had for the last century, and if they do well and exceed the artificial hiring cap of twenty employees, I say Hallelujah, and give them a medal. When did success and hiring more employees become a crime in Whatcom County??

I cannot believe that the County Council would make a hiring cap a law, in this employment environment. Whatcom County currently has approximately 7,000 unemployed people (voters), and Whatcom County also has 15% of its residents under the poverty level, which is higher than most Washington counties. How can we improve this without jobs?

Intellectuals sometimes do a poor job of understanding the common folks struggles, as they seldom have those same struggles. They love their own ideas, but that does not mean that we have to cave in and love what makes us unemployed.

Creating an environment where jobs are created is an extraordinarily compassionate thing to do, and I wish Wendy would put her considerable skill to work in that directions, rather than taking on petty job killing projects.

Wendy, although they named a hamburger stand after you, I will not hold that against you. If you come up with some ideas to increase the number of jobs in Whatcom County you will have my full support, as I think helping human beings in their financial struggles is a laudable goal.

This is not personal, but strictly policies that help people.


Wendy Harris  //  Fri, Nov 02, 2012, 8:44 pm

Doug, your accusations bear little resemblance to my statements. You define me as an industry-hating, job-destroying intellectual, deny the well-established environmental consequences of industrial slaughter, measure the extent of over-regulation by the height of library bookshelves, and then accuse me of using “hysterical arguments” without any hint of irony.

 


Doug Karlberg  //  Sat, Nov 03, 2012, 10:36 am

Irony, is that when one person successfully does their job, that twenty people lose theirs.

From your own words Wendy, your dislike of the beef industry is palpable, and this is from your words. I did not have to put them in your mouth.

The “well established environmental consequences of industrial slaughter” is far from well established in my mind. Specifics of this industrial mistreatment are lacking. Specifics of the plants, where they were located, when this abuse of the environment occurred, are lacking in your arguments. Even more important is that even given examples of slaughter-house abusing the environment, does not give me enough to indict a whole industry because of the actions of a few, nor most importantly convince me that the bad actions of a few far away from Whatcom County and likely long ago, are relevant to the modest proposal at hand.

Nothing breeds resentment more, than being falsely accused of the bad behavior of others.

Your words about the abuses of the cattle slaughter business do not ring true to me, because I have actually seen the slaughter business in Whatcom County.

Here are two examples of old slaughterhouses that are still in existence in Whatcom county that people can go look at ans see the extreme environmental mess left behind. One is the slaughterhouse at the intersection of Portal Way and I-5, and the other is the old Kratzig facility which now processes fish on the Hannegan.

There is no legacy mess that I can see, unless you see a little old manure, which is so toxic that is must be bagged up in ploy bags and hauled of to the hardware store where people buy it and spread it on their flower beds.

The old Kratzig facility is filled with new cars, which are people with JOBS processing fish from, (aghast), other states and nations.

The proposed slaughter-house would be already regulated by the EPA, USDA, DOE, and the FDA, all of which hold several rows in the law library, and I would assume possessed more detailed knowledge of this industry than you or I put together.

Well at least more than I possess.

Pointing to old abuse of the environment, that happened long ago, and somewhere else, and does not apply to this permit, is logically flawed argument. Your examples of abuse, are vague and not on point.

Last, the idea that Whatcom County can regulate the importation of cows from any where else, especially other states appears to me to be a clear violation of the Interstate Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution. When attorneys do not recognize the Constitution when this regulation so clearly violates the Commerce Clause, give me pause as to the zeal with which job destruction is being pursued.

Unless you can point to some pernicious risk that Oregon cows present, then counselor, I believe this 50% local cows only is a bunch of BS, and a clear violation of the US Constitution by County Council. Interstate and international commerce is exclusively the jurisdiction of Congress.

As a trained attorney you should know this, which I believe is evidence of your lack of objectivity on this issue. Violating the US Constitution is not a sign of objectivity.

Well I have milked this issue enough. Nothing personal Wendy, but I disagree with you, and I think your arguments inhibit job creation which has impacts on real peoples lives, that you do not seem to want to admit.

I will let you have the valuable last word counselor, and leave this in the hands of the jurors (readers).

I would like to thank the NW Citizen for letting us debate this subject of job creation, as it is on the minds of people across our nation.


John Lesow  //  Sat, Nov 03, 2012, 11:23 pm

Wendy Harris won this debate.  Doug Karlberg lost.

Jack Petree—go to your room.  Your random musings on slaughter are well documented in previous online snippets and snipes.  You just can’t seem to resist jumping on Wendy Harris or Jean Melious at every online opportunity.  Try to resist that temptation.

Loosely, the proposition was, “Should Whatcom County Move Forward on a Slaughtering/Rendering Proposal Now Before County Council”?

Wendy makes a convincing case that Council is, yet again, stumbling forward without adequate consideration of the ramifications of allowing an industrial use in an agricultural zone, an activity prohibited in nearby counties that do not allow slaughter as permitted use.

Doug has taken a different tack, relying mainly on anecdotes and vague notions about “jobs”, with a little schoolboy humor and class warfare thrown in to jazz up the rhetoric.

Wendy’s opinions are based on actual attendance at Council meetings where the topic of Slaughtering on Ag was actively considered.  As well as her considerable research on the subject. 

The last time I saw Doug in Council Chambers was when he was running for Mayor a few years ago.  His positions on the issue would have more authority if they were based on attendance and participation at public hearings, both Planning Commission and County Council.  As well as a review of staff reports and minutes.

Most of the arguments, pro and con, are ones I have heard over the past four months in Planning Commission and Council meetings.  I was one of the two Planning Commissioners that voted against the Slaughterhouse proposal and I have not heard any convincing arguments over the past three months that would change my mind.

I did support the original Planning Commission Staff proposal for “Small Scale Slaughterhouses”, which has devolved into the mess now before Council. 

I am not against jobs and, having been employed in the private sector for 38 years, know a thing or two about capitalism.

A few comments on Doug’s polemics:

Yes, the fact that rendering plants collect 100 million pounds of dead or dying animals every day in the U.S. is certainly a valuable public service.  And one would expect that in a first world country like ours, the disposal of the remains would incorporate first world methods, particularly with respect to water use and effluent treatment.  My concern is the effectiveness of septic tanks on agricultural land in Whatcom County.  A slaughterhouse may be able to handle the effluent effectively.  But no one really knows.  And each ag parcel is unique.  Some perk better than others.

The present proposal is for much larger facilities than were contemplated when this matter was first considered.  Reasonable objections should be expected.

Doug’s childhood memories of MSU’s (Mobile Slaughtering Units) are interesting, but I doubt if a modern MSU would operate in the same crude manner as his description;  blood and guts on the ground, puddles of blood, etc.  In my childhood, cars burned leaded gas and polluted like crazy.  Cars are much cleaner now.
So are MSU’s.  Unfortunately, this alternative has not had much consideration, other than a positive report submitted by Clayton Petree.

If I were a cynic, I would suggest that farmers are not keen on MSU’s because the prospect of a free upzone from an agricultural use to an industrial use by a compliant County Council would have a positive effect on the farmer’s land value.  While an MSU, no matter how efficient, would do nothing for the farmer’s bottom line.  Fortunately I am not a cynic.

Doug then gets huffy.  “Your efforts have produced harm to real people who need jobs to survive”.  This statement, and the claptrap that precedes it, is nonsense. 
The measure hasn’t even been enacted yet.  If it is, let’s see how many job seekers flock to those great slaughterhouse jobs.

Ask the average citizen where they would work, given the choice.  A slaughterhouse or an abortion clinic?  Both are engaged in a similar activity that would produce jobs and a paycheck.  My bet is that most would choose the clinic.

“Irony is when one person does their job and twenty lose theirs”.  Proof?  Show me 20 jobs that have been lost due to the present proposal.

I don’t see the similiarity between slaughterhouses on Ag land and a fish processor on the Hannegan.  Or a slaughterhouse in an industrial zone.  Remember that Slaughterhouses are now allowed in Rural Industrial Manufacturing and Industrial Zones.  In fact, I would wager that most of the County Council and Planning Commission would green-light slaughterhouses in Rural Zones, given the opportunity.  How many readers would support that?

I agree the requirement that 50% of the cattle originate in Whatcom County would be difficult to enforce.  I made the same observation with respect to food processing when the matter was before the Planning Commission five years ago.  Commerce Clause violation?  It would be an interesting point to litigate.

It’s disheartening that recent online discussions of “jobs” have centered on slaughterhouses and coal exports.  Neither will produce that many jobs and both will result in the continuing mongrelization of Whatcom County.


Satpal Sidhu, Candidate for State Representative, 42nd District

Tue, Sep 30, 2014, 8:00 am  //  Guest writer

Wherein a Fulbright scholar, professional engineer and successful business owner files for public office

3 comments; last on Sep 30, 2014

Hickory, Dickory, Docketing…Yet Another Spot Rezone

Mon, Sep 22, 2014, 5:07 am  //  Dick Conoboy

Last Thursday, the Planning Commission voted to recommend the docketing of the spot rezone of 801 Samish from Residential Single to Commerical Planned (non-retail)

4 comments; last on Sep 25, 2014

Paper Dreams in Fairhaven

Next door to Village Books

Samish Way Experience - Drug Dealing Dangers?

Wed, Sep 17, 2014, 10:26 am  //  John Servais

We post a disturbing report of a personal encounter along Samish Way, with the permission of John Stark, who experienced it.

2 comments; last on Sep 17, 2014

Who Will Be Appointed to Lehman’s City Council Seat?

Tue, Sep 09, 2014, 8:21 am  //  Riley Sweeney

Riley and John share the short list of who might replace Cathy Lehman on the Bellingham city council on January 5.

8 comments; last on Sep 10, 2014

An Imminent Threat:  The State Plans for CBR Disaster While Counties Punt

Mon, Aug 25, 2014, 11:48 am  //  Terry Wechsler

While the state spends hundreds of thousands of dollars defining risks of crude by rail, Skagit County finds no significant adverse impacts of a crude-by-rail proposal.

1 comments; last on Aug 28, 2014

You can’t fight city hall: city hall doesn’t fight fair

Fri, Aug 22, 2014, 2:06 pm  //  Guest writer

Patrick McKee of the Sunnyland Neighborhood guest-writes about the August 11 City Council slap-dash zoning changes.

2 comments; last on Aug 23, 2014

Good Friends and Neighbors:  What $54 Million Doesn’t Buy, Part 2

Wed, Aug 20, 2014, 4:54 pm  //  Terry Wechsler

Not content with causing massive inconvenience, BNSF is now literally dumping on county residents.

10 comments; last on Aug 26, 2014

Devil In the Details

Sat, Aug 16, 2014, 3:48 pm  //  Guest writer

Judith Green of the Sunnyland Neighborhood guest writes this brief summary of what went wrong with the planning last week.

1 comments; last on Aug 22, 2014

Good Friends and Neighbors:  What $54 Million Doesn’t Buy

Fri, Aug 15, 2014, 7:12 am  //  Terry Wechsler

A massive upgrade of the Cascade [rail] Corridor has left residents stranded and the sheriff asking Washington, DC, to intervene.

7 comments; last on Sep 02, 2014

Reliable Prosperity

Thu, Aug 14, 2014, 3:13 pm  //  Guest writer

Sandy Robson guest writes of the need for real prosperity at Cherry Point, not a destructive short term coal port that destroys the fishing grounds.

4 comments; last on Aug 18, 2014

Fleetwood versus Ericksen: What Happened in Round One?

Tue, Aug 12, 2014, 10:52 am  //  Riley Sweeney

Some Context for the Primary Results

0 comments

The Rule of Law - Bellingham Style

Mon, Aug 11, 2014, 11:31 pm  //  John Servais

Bellingham City Council abruptly changes zoning codes to force Planning Department plan on Sunnyland residents.

7 comments; last on Aug 14, 2014

Final Updated Election Results

Fri, Aug 08, 2014, 10:10 am  //  John Servais

Updated Wed evening. The Tuesday evening 8:20 pm Auditor report on the election is in.

5 comments; last on Aug 08, 2014

Councilmember Murphy’s Proposed Rental Ordinance Is Deeply Flawed

Fri, Aug 01, 2014, 8:00 am  //  Dick Conoboy

Councilmember Murphy's proposal is based on a complaint-based rental ordinance from Tacoma, demonstrated to do little for the health and safety of tenants.

14 comments; last on Oct 01, 2014

Trial by Fire:  A Rising Tide of Civil Disobedience

Fri, Aug 01, 2014, 4:47 am  //  Terry Wechsler

Carefully planned actions are rolling across the state to make the point that it's not OK to expose us to risks associated with CBR.

7 comments; last on Aug 04, 2014

Northwest Citizen Releases Polling of Whatcom Voters

Thu, Jul 24, 2014, 11:40 am  //  Riley Sweeney

Northwest Citizen has conducted a phone poll of likely voters, with some surprising results!

9 comments; last on Jul 29, 2014

Plan Commission & Samish Neighbors Bypassed on Rezone Docketing

Thu, Jul 24, 2014, 7:52 am  //  Dick Conoboy

In contravention of the Bellingham Municipal Code, the City Council will consider on 4 August a last minute docketing request that ignores the Planning Commission and Samish Neighborhood.

1 comments; last on Jul 30, 2014

Sunnyland Planning Process Explained - Partially

Wed, Jul 23, 2014, 10:47 pm  //  Guest writer

Guest writer Mike Rostron explains how Bellingham city planners played loose and illegal with planning processes.

0 comments

City Council Approves Resident’s Sunnyland Plan

Tue, Jul 22, 2014, 7:22 pm  //  John Servais

Sunnlyland residents win one - after a seven year effort. Planning Department failed them and all of us.

2 comments; last on Jul 23, 2014

What Landlords Need to Know about Rental Registration

Mon, Jul 21, 2014, 5:30 am  //  Guest writer

Landlords are so caught up opposing a licensing and inspection ordinance, they cannot see the upside for them in ridding the city of bad rentals.

19 comments; last on Aug 01, 2014

Sunnyland Deja Vu

Fri, Jul 18, 2014, 1:24 pm  //  Guest writer

Judith Green explains how the Bellingham Planning Department is trying to cram their plan onto a neighborhood.

5 comments; last on Jul 21, 2014

Trial by Fire:  Call to Action to Comment on the BP Pier Expansion

Sun, Jul 13, 2014, 2:26 pm  //  Terry Wechsler

Years after BP completed its north dock, the Army Corps of Engineers released a draft EIS and it's really really stupid.

0 comments

Intrado Not to Intrude in Bellingham

Tue, Jul 08, 2014, 8:20 am  //  Dick Conoboy

The city council "persuades" the city administration to withdraw a request for an intrusive police threat warning system

2 comments; last on Jul 08, 2014

Power to the Permit! (or Closely Hold This!)

Mon, Jul 07, 2014, 6:54 am  //  Terry Wechsler

It is time we stop allowing corporations to externalize the costs associated with their risky business practices, and demand more from our regulators who hold the keys to…

3 comments; last on Jul 13, 2014

Manifest Clandestine-y

Mon, Jul 07, 2014, 5:04 am  //  Guest writer

Guest writer Sandy Robson breaks the story of officials from Washington treated to a coal-promoting junket to Wyoming.

2 comments; last on Jul 13, 2014

A Question of Freedom

Fri, Jul 04, 2014, 5:00 am  //  Guest writer

Ferndale's most famous landmark is frequently commented on and is often in the news. Here is their side of the story.

4 comments; last on Jul 07, 2014

Trial by Fire: Lessons Not Learned One Year after Lac-Megantic

Wed, Jul 02, 2014, 5:14 pm  //  Terry Wechsler

On the anniversary of the Lac-Megantic disaster, communities throughout North America rally in solidarity to remember and protest wholly inadequate government response to crude-by-rail's risks.

4 comments; last on Jul 12, 2014

Sins of Omission

Fri, Jun 27, 2014, 9:01 pm  //  Guest writer

In the Weekly, Tim Johnson left out three words in quoting Craig Cole - and his story misleads readers. Guest article by Sandy Robson.

11 comments; last on Jul 01, 2014

DOJ Grant Brings Confusion and Anger to City Council Meeting

Tue, Jun 24, 2014, 10:24 am  //  Dick Conoboy

The Bellingham Police Department wants to purchase "threat assessment" software with federal monies. Citizen comments were vehement and negative. City Council confused.

5 comments; last on Jul 03, 2014

Widespread Slaughter Won’t Work

Tue, Jun 17, 2014, 10:18 pm  //  Tip Johnson

Wherein the failings of a bad policy framework are revealed

1 comments; last on Jun 19, 2014

Fireworks Ban in Bellingham in Effect as of 18 June

Tue, Jun 17, 2014, 7:53 am  //  Dick Conoboy

The possession and use of consumer fireworks are no longer permitted within the city limits.

1 comments; last on Jun 19, 2014

Herald and Weekly Withhold the News

Wed, Jun 11, 2014, 11:39 am  //  John Servais

Wyoming Senators and coal honchos were in Whatcom County June 10 - to hold a news conference with select reporters.

7 comments; last on Jun 20, 2014

Dawn Sturwold Retiring End of Month

Tue, Jun 10, 2014, 11:20 am  //  John Servais

Bellingham Hearing Examiner, Dawn Sturwold, retires in three weeks. Successor selection is hidden from all of us.

3 comments; last on Jun 11, 2014

Stay the Frack Out of Our Forearc Redux

Fri, Jun 06, 2014, 2:07 pm  //  Terry Wechsler

Part 2: Following Ken Oplinger to California, and Home Again

4 comments; last on Jun 19, 2014

The Road to Perdition

Sun, Jun 01, 2014, 12:39 am  //  Guest writer

A Venn diagram where coal, the Endangered Species Act, Republicans, and Wyoming’s Board of Education collide.

2 comments; last on Jun 02, 2014

Feint, Calumny, Solidarity

Wed, May 28, 2014, 3:15 pm  //  Guest writer

A perspective by guest writer Ellen Murphy reflects on the Whatcom Watch and the threatened law suit by Craig Cole.

22 comments; last on Jun 01, 2014

Extracting Profit and Destroying Experience: The Waterfront Plan

Tue, May 27, 2014, 1:23 am  //  Wendy Harris

Why was so little consideration given to the concept of developing the waterfront for eco-tourism?

5 comments; last on Jun 11, 2014

How Park Improvements Generate Heat

Mon, May 26, 2014, 7:51 pm  //  Wendy Harris

City park improvements have implications on the local and global scale.

2 comments; last on May 29, 2014

Montana & Wyoming to WA: Permit Coal Export Terminals… Or Else

Thu, May 22, 2014, 12:10 am  //  Guest writer

Wyoming is ready to try and legally force us to limit our environmental scoping for the Cherry Point coal terminal

4 comments; last on Jun 17, 2014

The Trojan Slaughterhouse and the Scrivener’s Errors

Sun, May 18, 2014, 11:57 pm  //  Wendy Harris

Reckless rezones and far-fetched explanations result in more slaughterhouses and meat packing plants

3 comments; last on May 20, 2014

Who Filed for Charter Review Commission?

Sat, May 17, 2014, 2:34 pm  //  Riley Sweeney

Riley takes a closer look at the Charter Review Commission candidates

2 comments; last on May 21, 2014

Bellingham’s 2013 Water Quality Report: The Facts But Not the Truth

Tue, May 13, 2014, 5:04 pm  //  Wendy Harris

Bellingham's annual water quality report indicates that city hall's propoganda machine is going strong

1 comments; last on May 14, 2014

Stay the Frack Out of Our Forearc

Sun, May 11, 2014, 2:20 pm  //  Terry Wechsler

Part 1: Introduction to the Bellingham Basin’s Potential for Fracking, Earthquakes, and Earthquakes Due to Fracking

3 comments; last on May 14, 2014

Riley scoops Herald - again

Fri, May 09, 2014, 10:02 am  //  John Servais

The Political Junkie for Whatcom County - that would be Riley Sweeney - has Overstreet not running for reelection in the 42nd.

1 comments; last on May 13, 2014

An Imminent Threat

Fri, May 09, 2014, 6:10 am  //  Terry Wechsler

Why Washington must step in and assume lead agency status in Skagit County for the Shell crude by rail proposal.

6 comments; last on Jun 21, 2014

The Whatcom Republicans’ Huge PCO Advantage

Tue, May 06, 2014, 5:52 pm  //  Riley Sweeney

The value of a Precinct Committee Officer . . .

1 comments; last on May 07, 2014

‘Legislative Sausage” or “Slaughter this Ordinance”

Mon, May 05, 2014, 3:34 pm  //  Tip Johnson

Wherein the gyrations of the bid for widespread county slaughter are exposed.

2 comments; last on May 07, 2014

Move To Amend - Persons vs Corporations

Thu, May 01, 2014, 10:21 pm  //  Guest writer

Move to Amend is a national movement to amend the U.S. Constitution and define persons as people and speech as not money.

7 comments; last on Jun 02, 2014

SweenyPolitics:  Fleetwood files against Ericksen

Wed, Apr 30, 2014, 8:20 am  //  John Servais

Riley posted this morning that Seth Fleetwood has decided to challenge Doug Ericksen for state senate in the 42nd District.

1 comments; last on Apr 30, 2014

Planning or Development Commission?

Mon, Apr 28, 2014, 6:28 am  //  Dick Conoboy

Every Bellingham Planning Commission member has ties to development or development-related businesses.

4 comments; last on Apr 30, 2014

“Friends and Neighbors”?

Mon, Apr 21, 2014, 1:59 pm  //  Terry Wechsler

A closer look at Whatcom County's industrial "stewards of the environment."

4 comments; last on Aug 28, 2014

Action Alert for Tonight: Waterfront Wildlife and Habitat Threatened

Mon, Apr 21, 2014, 11:43 am  //  Wendy Harris

The public needs to support city council and request that a waterfront habitat assessment include terrestrial species and habitat connectivity.

0 comments

Water, Water Everywhere, but ...

Sat, Apr 19, 2014, 2:57 pm  //  Terry Wechsler

or How Not to Plan for Future Generations' Water Needs

12 comments; last on Jun 30, 2014

Charter Review and District Only Voting

Thu, Apr 17, 2014, 10:40 am  //  Riley Sweeney

A simple explanation of the Charter Review and analysis of District only voting

0 comments

Roosevelt Neighborhood Pleads for Left Turns

Wed, Apr 09, 2014, 9:07 am  //  Riley Sweeney

City pushes for Alabama Street improvements, residents speak out

3 comments; last on Apr 14, 2014

Assault

Sun, Apr 06, 2014, 4:29 pm  //  Guest writer

By Christopher Grannis: Wherein despite every effort and expense, citizens cannot make the City follow the law or work for neighborhoods

2 comments; last on Apr 07, 2014

Killer Industrial Jobs or Long-term Job Killers?

Sun, Apr 06, 2014, 12:52 pm  //  Terry Wechsler

Why commenting on the EIS for Comp Plan revisions for Cherry Point means demanding an EIS in the first place.

5 comments; last on Jun 25, 2014

Anatomy of a Development Part XII - Citizens Win Against University Ridge

Wed, Apr 02, 2014, 6:00 am  //  Dick Conoboy

Ambling University Development Group pulls out. University Ridge will not be built.

12 comments; last on Apr 06, 2014

Tell County To Expand Scope of EIS Review for Plants and Animals

Tue, Apr 01, 2014, 1:27 pm  //  Wendy Harris

Please help us protect county wildlife by ensuring that the scope of the EIS review is adequate. A sample scoping letter is included.

0 comments

Public May Comment On EIS Scoping For County Comp. Plan Until April 7th

Mon, Mar 31, 2014, 2:23 am  //  Wendy Harris

The public has a week to comment on the scope of issues reviewed under the EIS.

0 comments

 

Election Info

Candidate Filings

Primary election results

Whatcom Auditor

Coal, Oil & Trains

Community Wise Bellingham

Powder River Basin R. C.

Local Blogs & News

Bellingham Herald

Bham Herald Politics Blog
Bham Politics & Economics
Cascadia Weekly
Ferndale Record
Friends of Whatcom
Get Whatcom Planning
KGMI
Latte Republic
League of Women Voters
Lynden Tribune
MikeatthePort
Northern Light

Twilight Zoning
Western Front - WWU
Whatcom Watch

Local Causes

Chuckanut Community Forest

City Club of Bellingham
Conservation NW
Futurewise - Whatcom
Lake Whatcom
Lummi Island Quarry
N. Cascades Audubon
NW Holocaust Center
RE Sources
Reduce Jet Noise
Salish Sea Org.
Save the Granary Building
Transition Whatcom
WA Conservation Voters

Governments

Bellingham

Port of Bellingham
Skagit County
US - The White House
WA State Access
WA State Elections
WA State Legislature
Whatcom Auditor
Whatcom Auditor
Whatcom County

Weather & Climate

Cliff Mass Weather Blog

Climate Audit
Nat Hurricane Center
NW Radar
Two day forecast
Watts Up With That? - climate

Leisure

Adventures NW

Edge of Sports
Entertainment NNW
Famous Internet Skiers
Recreation Northwest
Sailing Anarchy

Good Web Sites

Al-Jazeera online

Alaska Dispatch
AlterNet.org
Antiwar.com
Arab News
Asia Times
Atlantic, The

Common Dreams
counterpunch
Crosscut Seattle
Daily Kos
Daily Mirror
Doonesbury
Drudge Report
FiveThirtyEight
Foreign Policy in Focus
GlobalPost
Guardian Unlimited
Gulf News
Haaretz
Huffington Post
Innocence Project, The
Intrnational Herald Tribune
James Fallows
Jerusalem Post
Joel Connelly
Juan Cole
Julia Ioffe/New Republic
Le Diplo
Media Matters
Michael Moore
Middle East Times
MoveOn.org
Nation, The
New American Century
News Trust
NMFA
numbers
Online Journal
Palestine Daily
Palestine News
Paul Krugman - economics
Personal bio info
Portland Indy Media
Progressive Review
Project Vote Smart
Reuters
Sea Shepherd
Slate
Stand for the Troops
Ta-Nehisi Coates
Talking Points Memo
TED
The Crisis Papers
The Intercept
the Oatmeal
Tom Paine.com
truthout
Vox
War and Piece
Washington Votes
WikiLeaks.ch
ynetnews.com

NwCitizen 1995 - 2007

Early Northwest Citizen

Quiet, Offline or Dead

Bellingham Police Activity

Bellingham Register
Bob Sanders
Carl Weimer
Chuckanut Mountains
Citizen Ted
Citizens of Bellingham
Cordata & Meridian
David Hackworth
Facebook Port Reform
HamsterTalk
Jack Petree
N. Sound Conservancy
No Leaky Buckets
Northwest Review
Orcinus
Post-Oklahoman Confessions
Protect Bellingham Parks
The American Telegraph
Wally Wonders