Chuckanut Ridge now fully owned by bank
Permalink +Fri, Jul 22, 2011, 3:52 pm // John Servais
Washington Federal has bought out Greenbriar's interest in Chuckanut Ridge. This clears the way for a sale of the 100 plus acres to the city of Bellingham - and the preservation of this valuable wetlands.
This morning on the courthouse steps a foreclosure auction was held and Washington Federal paid itself about $11 million for the 50% share of David Edelstein's portion of Greenbriar's ownership in the property. Sound complicated? This only touches the very basics. Edelstein has reportedly held back the sale of the property by the bank to the city for over a year now. The bank has been ready to sell the property to the city since taking over the assets of defunct Horizon Bank over a year ago. Edelstein was a major player in that bank and had millions in loans from the bank - which he has since owed to Washington Federal.
Mayor Dan Pike will now no doubt put together a purchase deal with the bank for close to $9 million and then seek City Council approval. The property is only worth about $6 million, according to some experts. And whether the council will approve over spending by almost $3 million city tax dollars is another question.
The auction was a surprise to most of those I contacted today. While there was a little-noticed legal notice in the Herald, there was no reporting in the paper and, indeed, even as I post now there is no information on the Bellingham Herald website.
If others have more information on all this, please feel free to comment and help us all learn more.
Comments (3)
To add a comment, click here to login or register.
Robert P. Gibb // Sat, Jul 23, 2011, 11:11 pm
John, my comments about Chuckanut Ridge (CR) are as President of the Chuckanut Mountains Park District Advisory Committee. Yes, we are still alive but without much resource. We have played a role in the CR saga, communicating with the FDIC as Horizon collapsed, and with Washington Federal (WF). We have monitored their successful foreclosure, their lawsuits and counter suites with Edelstein, and the fascinating redundant process of sale of the property to themselves in the court house atrium above the steps where there were several other sales going on at the same time.
We have met with several City Council members, President Shepard at WWU, and Mayor Pike relative to setting up joint ownership of CR much like the Sehome Arboretum, between the City and WWU. Our pitch is that the City pay whatever it can negotiate with the bank for half of the title. The other half will be donated by WF as a charitable donation to the WWU Foundation. Naming rights might be included. WF is concerned that the FDIC will/may object but I have discussed this with the FDIC legal counsel and off the top, he saw no problem as long as it is standard banking practices. From my perspective gifting a forested wetland to an educational institution for teaching and research purposes is far more socially redeeming than funding a baseball or football stadium for a bunch of professional athletes and private owners to make their personal fortunes.
For the City, joint ownership shares the maintenance, operational and liability costs. It will generate positive PR and make whatever the finale negotiated cost look better. The mayor has agreed. Despite the many guesses as to the value of the property, it has always been what a willing buyer will pay. Of interest at the courthouse sale, Steve Adelstein, I presume representing David Edelstein, before the auction started asked the trustee conducting the auction, what the bank’s bidding price was. Developers are still out there willing to buy a swamp, if the prices is low enough. Hopefully, whoever does the negotiating for the City keeps this in mind as they negotiate.
This property will not tolerate high recreational use. It requires environmental protection to continue to function in nurturing Chuckanut and Padden Creeks and protecting Puget Sound. WWU will have a strong vested interest in maintaining this property. Huxley will be the only environmental college in the nation with a forested wetland as a teaching and research asset within walking distance of the campus.
The job now is to educate the City Council and the community at large that acquisition by the City and WWU is a worthwhile environmental investment for future generations.
We have met with several City Council members, President Shepard at WWU, and Mayor Pike relative to setting up joint ownership of CR much like the Sehome Arboretum, between the City and WWU. Our pitch is that the City pay whatever it can negotiate with the bank for half of the title. The other half will be donated by WF as a charitable donation to the WWU Foundation. Naming rights might be included. WF is concerned that the FDIC will/may object but I have discussed this with the FDIC legal counsel and off the top, he saw no problem as long as it is standard banking practices. From my perspective gifting a forested wetland to an educational institution for teaching and research purposes is far more socially redeeming than funding a baseball or football stadium for a bunch of professional athletes and private owners to make their personal fortunes.
For the City, joint ownership shares the maintenance, operational and liability costs. It will generate positive PR and make whatever the finale negotiated cost look better. The mayor has agreed. Despite the many guesses as to the value of the property, it has always been what a willing buyer will pay. Of interest at the courthouse sale, Steve Adelstein, I presume representing David Edelstein, before the auction started asked the trustee conducting the auction, what the bank’s bidding price was. Developers are still out there willing to buy a swamp, if the prices is low enough. Hopefully, whoever does the negotiating for the City keeps this in mind as they negotiate.
This property will not tolerate high recreational use. It requires environmental protection to continue to function in nurturing Chuckanut and Padden Creeks and protecting Puget Sound. WWU will have a strong vested interest in maintaining this property. Huxley will be the only environmental college in the nation with a forested wetland as a teaching and research asset within walking distance of the campus.
The job now is to educate the City Council and the community at large that acquisition by the City and WWU is a worthwhile environmental investment for future generations.
Tip Johnson // Mon, Jul 25, 2011, 9:36 am
Sure, price is always an issue.
I remember when developers wanted Big Rock Garden and argued that it was inappropriate for the City to pay more than they would. I disagreed. If a property is worth preserving, it is worth outbidding developers.
The Chuckanut Ridge property is a little more complicated. In this case, the exorbitant value was literally cooked up by phony zoning and maintained through terrible City planning and administration. Even after all that, it appraised in 1996 (or thereabouts) at a bit over $3 million. Then we had the housing bubble and the greed-bone antics of a failed bank and developer pumping it up to a turgid $24 million asking price, assessed around $14 million.
Today it is a different story. I doubt developers will be clamoring for a piece of the Chuckanut Ridge action. They certainly were not thronging the courthouse steps to buy it at half the would-be developers price. One look at the DEIS unequivocally underscores the absurdity of the proposal. It showed that a negotiated one-half of the zoned density would create a disaster. Newcomers will have to face that fact and won’t be able to exploit archaic wetland protection standards and claims of vestment that the City has so conveniently maintained for the now failed proponents.
Nevertheless, the Chuckanut Ridge property has great value to the City. It is the only property that could expand Fairhaven Park to meet the City’s own standards for the area’s planned population targets. It is the only property that can effectively bridge Fairhaven Park to the City’s existing Interurban investments. It is the only property tha City might use to create a regionally significant Gateway to the Chuckanuts. After that, it is a wetland wonderland that sustains an important foodchain and habitat.
So I’m OK with outbidding developers. But times have changed. The Bank and the City should now do what is usually required: another appraisal. However, the City has been remiss in not reviewing the zoning and in not enforcing the wetland public safety standards. It has foolishly bent over backwards to advantage this project time and again. It has created an unreasonable expectation for the property and its carrying capacity.
It is time to square away these factors and appraise the property at it’s highest and best reasonable use. Then the City can feel just fine about outbidding that number.
I remember when developers wanted Big Rock Garden and argued that it was inappropriate for the City to pay more than they would. I disagreed. If a property is worth preserving, it is worth outbidding developers.
The Chuckanut Ridge property is a little more complicated. In this case, the exorbitant value was literally cooked up by phony zoning and maintained through terrible City planning and administration. Even after all that, it appraised in 1996 (or thereabouts) at a bit over $3 million. Then we had the housing bubble and the greed-bone antics of a failed bank and developer pumping it up to a turgid $24 million asking price, assessed around $14 million.
Today it is a different story. I doubt developers will be clamoring for a piece of the Chuckanut Ridge action. They certainly were not thronging the courthouse steps to buy it at half the would-be developers price. One look at the DEIS unequivocally underscores the absurdity of the proposal. It showed that a negotiated one-half of the zoned density would create a disaster. Newcomers will have to face that fact and won’t be able to exploit archaic wetland protection standards and claims of vestment that the City has so conveniently maintained for the now failed proponents.
Nevertheless, the Chuckanut Ridge property has great value to the City. It is the only property that could expand Fairhaven Park to meet the City’s own standards for the area’s planned population targets. It is the only property that can effectively bridge Fairhaven Park to the City’s existing Interurban investments. It is the only property tha City might use to create a regionally significant Gateway to the Chuckanuts. After that, it is a wetland wonderland that sustains an important foodchain and habitat.
So I’m OK with outbidding developers. But times have changed. The Bank and the City should now do what is usually required: another appraisal. However, the City has been remiss in not reviewing the zoning and in not enforcing the wetland public safety standards. It has foolishly bent over backwards to advantage this project time and again. It has created an unreasonable expectation for the property and its carrying capacity.
It is time to square away these factors and appraise the property at it’s highest and best reasonable use. Then the City can feel just fine about outbidding that number.
Larry Horowitz // Mon, Jul 25, 2011, 1:12 pm
In many ways, the ball is now in Washington Federal’s court. For the past year and a half, bank executives have pledged their intent to ‘do the right thing’ but were stymied by their inability to act unilaterally while WA Fed was handicapped by the joint venture agreement initiated by Horizon Bank.
Now that the property itself is owned outright by WA Fed - and the bank is no longer encumbered by its association with Edelstein - will WA Fed ‘do the right thing’?
Will the bank finally recognize that there is absolutely no value (nada, zilch…) associated with any perceived ability to circumvent the unique public safety and environmental safeguards of the almost six year old Critical Areas Ordinance (CAO)?
Does WA Fed understand that any development of this property will require 150 foot minimum buffers for all five Category 1 wetlands?
Will WA Fed revise its appraisal to reflect these expanded buffers and reduced developability?
WA Fed can be a good corporate citizen worthy of its slogan… ‘Washington Federal. invested here’. Or it can attempt to squeeze every penny from Bellingham taxpayers by trying to sell the property to the city at an over-inflated value based on insufficient wetland buffers.
To date, Mayor Pike has failed to protect the safety of Bellingham residents by refusing to enforce the CAO, a law specifically designed to protect the public from injury, loss of life, and property damage due to erosion, flooding, landslides, and steep slope failures. By law, public safety ordinances are exempt from vesting, but the city attorney is apparently not up to speed.
Regardless, the application is not vested under the prior wetland laws because it is neither complete nor compliant with the laws in effect when submitted. Of course, vesting was made irrelevant when the Dept of Ecology confirmed they will require best available science for the Category 1 wetland buffers, a minimum of at least 150 feet.
Hopefully our esteemed Council members have been paying attention and will require a revised appraisal based on 150 foot buffers. The revised appraisal will need to reflect the fact that, under best available science and 150 foot buffers, the connector road prerequisite cannot be met. Consequently, the land is potentially undevelopable, at least as a high density, multi-family project.
It’s time for all parties to ‘do the right thing’. Not only Washington Federal, but our own public servants as well.
Now that the property itself is owned outright by WA Fed - and the bank is no longer encumbered by its association with Edelstein - will WA Fed ‘do the right thing’?
Will the bank finally recognize that there is absolutely no value (nada, zilch…) associated with any perceived ability to circumvent the unique public safety and environmental safeguards of the almost six year old Critical Areas Ordinance (CAO)?
Does WA Fed understand that any development of this property will require 150 foot minimum buffers for all five Category 1 wetlands?
Will WA Fed revise its appraisal to reflect these expanded buffers and reduced developability?
WA Fed can be a good corporate citizen worthy of its slogan… ‘Washington Federal. invested here’. Or it can attempt to squeeze every penny from Bellingham taxpayers by trying to sell the property to the city at an over-inflated value based on insufficient wetland buffers.
To date, Mayor Pike has failed to protect the safety of Bellingham residents by refusing to enforce the CAO, a law specifically designed to protect the public from injury, loss of life, and property damage due to erosion, flooding, landslides, and steep slope failures. By law, public safety ordinances are exempt from vesting, but the city attorney is apparently not up to speed.
Regardless, the application is not vested under the prior wetland laws because it is neither complete nor compliant with the laws in effect when submitted. Of course, vesting was made irrelevant when the Dept of Ecology confirmed they will require best available science for the Category 1 wetland buffers, a minimum of at least 150 feet.
Hopefully our esteemed Council members have been paying attention and will require a revised appraisal based on 150 foot buffers. The revised appraisal will need to reflect the fact that, under best available science and 150 foot buffers, the connector road prerequisite cannot be met. Consequently, the land is potentially undevelopable, at least as a high density, multi-family project.
It’s time for all parties to ‘do the right thing’. Not only Washington Federal, but our own public servants as well.
Padden Trails is Chuckanut Ridge Lite
Wed, Feb 22, 2012, 12:04 am // Guest writer
Yet another neighborhood wants the Planning Department to protect public health, safety, and general welfare
3 comments; last on Feb 22, 2012
Congressional Candidates and Overstreet’s Town Hall
Sun, Feb 19, 2012, 4:37 pm // Riley Sweeney
Riley at The Political Junkie attends a forum of Congressional Candidates, and a town hall meeting in Lynden0 comments
Squalicum Mountain development gets favors from county
Sat, Feb 18, 2012, 2:03 pm // Guest writer
No EIS - no real county planning concern about developing Squalicum Mountain and degrading Lake Whatcom water even further.
0 comments
Chilling Effect on Comments Created by Council Chair
Fri, Feb 17, 2012, 6:54 pm // Wendy Harris
Attempts by the County Council Chairperson to move the open public comment period to the end of a Council meeting will reduce public input.0 comments
A Vision for Fairhaven
Thu, Feb 16, 2012, 2:38 pm // John Servais
The Fairhaven Neighborhood Plan gets its first open meeting tonight - where anyone can present their ideas for the future.
0 comments
This Is What Conflict Of Interest Looks Like
Wed, Feb 15, 2012, 11:38 am // Wendy Harris
Lesa Starkenburg, former County contract attorney for GMA appeal, demands recusal of Council members who oppose development proposal by her private client, Nor'West Gravel1 comments; last on Feb 15, 2012
The Big Business of Breast Cancer
Wed, Feb 08, 2012, 8:14 am // Guest writer
There’s no profit in searching for causes, and we know there's no real cure. But there's big money in the detection and treatment of breast cancer.
2 comments; last on Feb 11, 2012
An inexpensive way to save children’s lives
Tue, Feb 07, 2012, 1:41 pm // John Servais
Bellingham is slowly installing flashing yellow lights for school zones. This is far better than trapping drivers with speed zone cameras. But, no city revenue.
2 comments; last on Feb 09, 2012
UPDATE: City of Bham Moonlighting Issue - More Documents
Mon, Jan 30, 2012, 10:58 pm // Riley Sweeney
Riley updates us on the latest facts coming to light about City of Bellingham employee moonlighting2 comments; last on Feb 01, 2012
Compliance, Noncompliance and Invalidity in Whatcom County
Sun, Jan 29, 2012, 10:16 pm // Wendy Harris
The County's rural planning actions have not just failed to comply with the GMA...they have contradicted the goals of the GMA.3 comments; last on Feb 05, 2012
A Worm’s Eye View of our local WorkSource Center
Wed, Jan 25, 2012, 9:42 am // Riley Sweeney
Riley visits the local WorkSource center and interviews the regional director
0 comments
Watch out for basement flooding
Thu, Jan 19, 2012, 9:03 pm // Paul de Armond
Stormwater surge may back up sewers
5 comments; last on Jan 21, 2012
The Political Junkie interviews Kathy Kershner
Thu, Jan 19, 2012, 4:29 pm // Riley Sweeney
Riley discusses the Jail, Jack Louws, and an impartial council with our new Council Chair
1 comments; last on Jan 20, 2012
SOPA - A Step in Destroying Democracy
Thu, Jan 19, 2012, 12:17 am // John Servais
NWCitizen.com went black for Wednesday, Jan 18, 2012, as a protest against proposed legislation, SOPA and PIPA. Here is what was posted.1 comments; last on Jan 19, 2012
Why SOPA is so terrible
Tue, Jan 17, 2012, 6:28 pm // John Servais
On Wednesday, thousands of websites will go dark to show opposition to SOPA. I will be posting a single article explaining who SOPA is so bad.0 comments
Planning Commissioner Mocks Environmental Concern For Coal Terminal
Sat, Jan 14, 2012, 11:06 pm // Wendy Harris
Planning Commissioner Onkels should recuse himself from review of environmental impacts at GPT.3 comments; last on Feb 08, 2012
Jack Petree, Olympia, the Whatcom Council and Obama’s Inner Circle
Wed, Jan 11, 2012, 8:04 am // Riley Sweeney
Latest from the Political Junkie on a variety of subjects
7 comments; last on Jan 15, 2012
Commmunity Governance at its Best
Mon, Jan 09, 2012, 8:27 pm // Tip Johnson
We have a new mayor!
4 comments; last on Jan 10, 2012
Property Rights Protected Under Lake Whatcom Stormwater Proposal
Sun, Jan 08, 2012, 11:02 pm // Wendy Harris
The County's proposed stormwater regulations for Lake Whatcom will increase development without improving water quality2 comments; last on Jan 20, 2012
Riley Rouses Row Over Domestic Violence
Sun, Jan 08, 2012, 1:21 am // John Servais
Issue is County Council member Kathy Kershner and how our social service programs are funded.3 comments; last on Jan 08, 2012
Some thoughts on the Occupy Bellingham issue
Sun, Jan 01, 2012, 12:05 am // John Servais
A third note on Jan 1 about the Herald photos with links. And previous thoughts on the trivia around the militarized evictions.9 comments; last on Jan 10, 2012
Kelli Linville has taken oath as mayor
Fri, Dec 30, 2011, 2:07 pm // John Servais
Kelli assumes office of mayor at midnight Dec 316 comments; last on Jan 02, 2012
Bellingham Herald removes comments
Fri, Dec 30, 2011, 11:59 am // Wendy Harris
Decide for yourself if this blog comment, posted under my own name, should have been flagged and removed from the Bellingham Herald Online Edition.1 comments; last on Dec 30, 2011
Herald Permits Censorship of Pro-Occupy Bellingham Comments
Fri, Dec 30, 2011, 11:14 am // Wendy Harris
Anyone can "flag" a blog posting, resulting in immediate removal of your comment, regardless of merit. This is occuring for comments supporting OB.1 comments; last on Dec 30, 2011
City Exceeds Scope of Occupy Bellingham Eviction
Wed, Dec 28, 2011, 8:26 pm // Wendy Harris
The City infringed on the public’s right to peaceful assembly in a public park by enforcing an inappropriate public safety law2 comments; last on Dec 30, 2011
Dan Pike Issues Order to Evict Occupy Bellingham
Tue, Dec 27, 2011, 11:55 am // Riley Sweeney
Riley questions Pike's timing, and Occupy's choice of tactics2 comments; last on Dec 28, 2011
Updates from The Political Junkie
Tue, Dec 20, 2011, 2:19 pm // Riley Sweeney
Where Riley provides more info on the City of Bellingham employees moonlighting issue and Crawford's ethical troubles
0 comments
Dock Increases Risk of Invasive Species on Lake Whatcom
Sun, Dec 18, 2011, 8:43 pm // Wendy Harris
Relocation of a dock to Bloedel Donovan Park underscores failure to protect Lake Whatcom from invasive species0 comments
Sam Crawford Faces Ethical Concerns . . . AGAIN
Thu, Dec 15, 2011, 12:44 pm // Riley Sweeney
Local blogger Shane Roth files ethical complaint over Crawford's sweetheart deals
3 comments; last on Dec 16, 2011
Planning Commission Fails to Remove Cherry Point From Birch Bay Mitigation Plan
Wed, Dec 14, 2011, 7:05 am // Wendy Harris
Claiming it is unfair to treat large property owners different than small property owners, the Commission refuses to remove industrial areas from buffer mitigation proposal.0 comments
Rick Perry, Can We Talk?
Tue, Dec 13, 2011, 9:58 am // Riley Sweeney
Riley has a conversation with Rick Perry
2 comments; last on Dec 16, 2011
For Gift Ideas, Think Beyond Parker Brothers
Sat, Dec 10, 2011, 9:32 am // Riley Sweeney
Riley discusses his love of board games and some good gift ideas
2 comments; last on Dec 11, 2011
The Political Junkie needs your input
Thu, Dec 08, 2011, 12:47 pm // Riley Sweeney
Please take my reader's survey, I'm planning 2012
0 comments
Loophole Benefits SSA and Undermines Birch Bay Mitigation Proposal
Wed, Dec 07, 2011, 7:00 am // Wendy Harris
Tell the Planning Commission to eliminate this loophole2 comments; last on Dec 14, 2011
Washington United for Marriage: It’s Time!
Tue, Dec 06, 2011, 11:12 am // Riley Sweeney
Riley attends a public meeting on equality
0 comments
The Cole Train: Loads of BS
Sun, Dec 04, 2011, 4:53 pm // Tip Johnson
Wherein the sooty prospect of economic necessity rears its ugly head
2 comments; last on Dec 04, 2011
Update on Cherry Point Buffer Mitigation Proposal
Fri, Dec 02, 2011, 1:08 pm // Wendy Harris
Planning Staff's recommended revision will not prevent SSA from reducing wetland buffers.0 comments
UPDATE: City’s response focused on favoritism, not lost revenue
Wed, Nov 30, 2011, 5:51 pm // Riley Sweeney
More on the city employee moonlighting issue0 comments
TPJ Exclusive: Little Documented Oversight for City Employee Moonlighting
Mon, Nov 28, 2011, 4:29 pm // Riley Sweeney
The Political Junkie breaks a story of employee moonlighting within city of Bellingham
7 comments; last on Nov 30, 2011
Deer me!
Sat, Nov 26, 2011, 3:30 pm // Tip Johnson
O.K. Who's in charge of all these ungulates?14 comments; last on Dec 01, 2011
County Proposal Includes New Cherry Point Buffer Mitigation Requirements
Tue, Nov 22, 2011, 9:29 pm // Wendy Harris
The County's new mitigation proposal is unlikely to be adequate for Cherry Point's industrial impacts to habitat buffers3 comments; last on Nov 24, 2011
New links
Colbert Super PacCurrent Interest
Bham Camera ScamColbert Super Pac
Local Blogs & News
Bellingham HeraldBham Politics & Economics
Bhm Herald Politics Blog
Bob Sanders
Cascadia Weekly
Citizen Ted
Ferndale Record
Foothills Gazette
Get Whatcom Planning
HamsterTalk
KGMI
Latte Republic
Lynden Tribune
MikeatthePort
Northern Light
Northwest Review
Sweeney Politics
Twilight Zoning
Wally Wonders
Western Front - WWU
Whatcom Watch
Local causes
Bham Camera ScamBham CofC political blog
Chuckanut Mountains
Citizens of Bellingham
City Club of Bham
Community Wise Bellingham
Conservation NW
Cordata & Meridian
Futurewise - Whatcom
Jail - local mega plans
Lake Whatcom
N. Cascades Audubon
N. Sound Conservancy
Neighborhood Schools Coalition
No Leaky Buckets
NW Holocaust Center
RE Sources
Transition Whatcom
WA Conservation Voters
Publisher recommended
Americans Elect 2012Bham Politics & Economics
Community Wise Bellingham
Guardian Unlimited
Paul Krugman - economics
Redistricting WA state
Sweeney Politics
Watts Up With That? - climate
WikiLeaks.ch
NwCitizen 1995 to 2008
Early Northwest CitizenWeather & Climate
Cliff Mass Weather BlogClimate Audit
NW Radar
Two day forecast
Watts Up With That? - climate
Cascadia
Crosscut SeattleJoel Connelly
Orcinus
Portland Indy Media
Seattle Indy Media
Washington Votes
Leisure
Adventures NWEdge of Sports
Entertainment NNW
Famous Internet Skiers
Sailing Anarchy
Worth checking out
Al-Jazeera onlineAlaska Dispatch
AlterNet.org
Americans Elect 2012
Antiwar.com
Arab News
Asia Times
Atlantic, The
Buzz Flash
Common Dreams
counterpunch
Daily Beast, The
Daily Kos
Daily Mirror
Drudge Report
FiveThirtyEight
Foreign Policy in Focus
Guardian Unlimited
Gulf News
Haaretz
Huffington Post
Innocence Project, The
Intrnational Herald Tribune
James Fallows
Jerusalem Post
Juan Cole
Le Diplo
Media Matters
Middle East Times
MoveOn.org
Nation, The
New American Century
News Trust
NMFA
numbers
Online Journal
Palestine Daily
Palestine News
Paul Krugman - economics
Personal bio info
Politico
Progressive Review
Project Vote Smart
Reuters
Sea Shepherd
Slate
Talking Points Memo
The Onion
Tom Paine.com
truthout
War and Piece
WikiLeaks.ch
ynetnews.com
Governments
Auditor election pageBellingham
Bham - PFD
Candidate Filings
Election Results
Redistricting WA state
Skagit County
The White House
WA State Access
WA State Elections
WA State Legislature
Whatcom Auditor
Whatcom County
Other - for whatever
Ban Red Light CamsBushFlash.com
Chickehhawks
Coal quandary
Doonesbury
George Bush
Info Clearing House
Mainstreampolitics
Michael Moore
Nat Geo on Coal Trains
Reality News
The Crisis Papers
Third World Traveler
Unity08
Washington Outsiders
Less active
Bellingham RegisterCarl Weimer
Eye on Whatcom
John Watts
Post-Oklahoman Confessions
The American Telegraph
Quiet, offline or dead
David HackworthGitmo prisoner 345
Mega Awesome
Not in my county
Parkenfarker
Pro-Whatcom