Chuckanut Mountains and the Park District

Permalink +

Fri, Feb 01, 2013, 4:16 pm  //  Guest writer

Dr. Robert Gibb presents this guest aticle.

I write as President of the Chuckanut Mountains Park District Advisory Committee.  The so-called Greenway endowment fund was proposed by the Beyond Greenway II proponents to accommodate fiscal situations such as occurred when the City Council was considering the purchase of the Chuckanut Ridge property. I was one of those proponents and it was suggested that the fund be developed over a period of years from 10% of the annual budget.  Why does it have to be suddenly repaid?

The stimulus for the proposed Park District is because the current administration and others, have been proposing the sale of 25 acres of the 100 Acre Woods to replace the 3.2 million taken from that fund.  Best Available Science and the State Department of Ecology will require 300 foot buffers around the Class I wetlands that are the vital, precious component of that property.  Those buffers will allow only 12 acres for development.  That acreage will be required for limited public access to the property.  Infrastructure costs and topographical restrictions make any housing development prohibitively expensive, even if funded with public funding support as occurs with housing developments.

In the history of Municipal Park Districts, none have exercised Eminent Domain or increased property taxes to the 75 cents per $1000 permitted.  Any MPD Commissioner suggesting such is committing political suicide.

The proposed Park District is the means of settling this 25 year old problem of preserving this ecological treasure and should be supported.

Barbara Perry  //  Fri, Feb 01, 2013, 6:14 pm

Alex McLean //  Thu, Jan 31, 2013, 9:55 pm

Dear Alex:
Most people voting on the Parks initiative live within less than a mile to the Interurban trail that will take anyone to the mountain.  I live on the north edge of Happy Valley and condos are only a couple of blocks north within the voting area. In the past, I have hiked up to Pine and Cedar Lakes, both of which are further, but the salmon streams from Connelly and Padden Creeks are less than a 1/2 mile away from my home and the Interurban I am now planning to travel on my electric disability scooter is less than a mile away.  Both creeks are fed by the mountain.

You may not have the wonderful memories of walking through the forest.  I no longer walk but treasure the look out the window to see the mountain and recall those walks and life forms visited.  I suggest you get on your hiking boots. It is better than a day in class and more educational.

Barbara Perry, MA in Lit


Delaine Clizbe  //  Fri, Feb 01, 2013, 9:35 pm

Barbara,
I finally had to pull out a map to get it straight in my head what the issue is with these “salmon streams”.  Padden Creek runs down the Northern border of the property.  The interurban trail lies in between the creek and the 100 acre wood.  Connelly Creek is on the North Side of of Old Fairhaven Parkway and joins into Padden Creek at about 24th.  While Padden Creek may be “fed by the mountain” from 24th street to Fairhaven, I’m not sure how the water from the mountain is jumping across Old Fairhaven Parkway to feed Connelly Creek.  Kind of a stretch.  And I"m pretty sure that runoff from the northern portion of the forest would have a hard time flowing across the interurban trail to get into Padden Creek.  And if Padden Creek is so sensitive, we really shouldn’t have a gravel covered trail running right beside it.

Furthermore, the other salmon stream in the area, Chuckanut Creek is across Old Samish Road from the Chuckanut Community Forest.  Proposed development on a very small portion of the forest has been suggested on the southern end.  So run off from that development is supposed to cross over Old Samish Road or Chuckanut Drive? 

So the “salmon stream” argument is a bit thin.

Now, I would love to have an actual trail system in the Chuckanut Community Forest that you would be able to drive your scooter on.  I have advocated for that from the beginning.  One of my biggest fears is that the Chuckanut Community Forest Steering Committee will work to limit trail access in the woods.  I think you are more at risk here than the salmon.  (notice Dr. Gibb says “limited public access”.  How limited?)

Delaine Clizbe, BS in Nutrition


Bill Geyer  //  Fri, Feb 01, 2013, 10:33 pm

Dr Gibb, Thank you for your article.  Your application of the best available science states 12 acres of the site can be developed.  Surely you would support the Bellingham Comprehensive Plan goal for an average density of 6 residential units per acre.  This prevents sprawl.  And, 6 units per acre are much lower than the current 8.7 units per acre defined in the current zoning for Chuckanut Woods (Residential Multiple, 5,000 sq ft per unit). 

Using the Comp Plan density goal, your analysis establishes 72 housing units can be built in Chuckanut Ridge.  Using your assumptions, let’s turn to the economic results of your proposal.

A willing buyer in today’s market would purchase 12 acres based on the residual land value of the site (the value of the land without any improvements).  The equation:

Residual land value = Number of units permitted   x $Value of each unit

For 12 acres @ 6 units/acre and a modest value of $20,000/unit, your proposal creates:

6 x 12 x $20,000 = $1,440,000. 

With little effort, the City Council can pay off 45% of the existing $3,200,000 loan. 
That’s a great beginning. 

For the rest of the Chuckanut Woods site, the City owns development rights for 642 more units.  Even in a depressed market at a low value of $2,500 per unit, the City Council could sell the development rights for another $2,500 x 642 = $1,605,000. 

$1,440,000 + $1,605,000 = $3,045,000.

If the City Council sells the development rights over the next four years in a stronger market, the City will make up the final $155,000, and more.

Congratulations, you have solved the critical financial need for the City Council. 
There is no need for a new parks district.

-Bill Geyer, AICP


Alex McLean  //  Sat, Feb 02, 2013, 9:24 am

If we really wanted to protect salmon we would have thrown all our efforts toward saving Galbraith Mountain. During a fleetingly brief window, that 3,000+ acre logging tract, complete with its world-renowned mountain biking trails, was for sale for roughly $20 million. Mayor Dan Pike could not, in any conscientious or financial way, consider trying to save both properties so, instead, he pulled the trigger on Chuckanut Ridge. Greenways can, and has, purchased far more massive tracts than this meager sliver at far better prices. The City of Bellingham, last year, bought 320 acres in our watershed for $2.6 million.

Although none of these are apples-to-apples comparisons, my point is that we are being asked to pay a lot of cash for something that provides very little benefit to either the environment or to those people who are not already blessed enough to live next to this forest and its thousands of acres of adjoining parks, trails, protected forests, beach access, parks, more parks, and trails.

The salmon in Padden Creek will not be impacted by the development tract of our new re-purchase. Water would have to defy physics to access this creek.

$3.2 million, for an undefined amount of land, is a lot of money for not much benefit. The theoretical 25 acres that is bandied about needs to be tempered by reality: This property, this slice of City-owned Chuckanut Ridge, was NEVER EVER rezoned. While it could, theoretically, be more land for sale, proponents know that they can apply significant pressure on City Council—which views this property as radioactive—to allow for yurts and grass hutches if that is what they demand. With advances in Low Impact Development, or LID, there could be precisely zero net impact to salmon and, it should be noted, far less impact than any of the houses proponents live in currently which are part of these drainage basins.

I am not a developer, no matter how ardently proponents may wish otherwise, but I have to concede that Bill Geyer has offered some compelling math which, even if only partially correct, seems to imply there are other, less costly routes to reduce the zoning burden imposed on this property.

Either way, Happy Valley, the densest neighborhood in Bellingham, is being asked to pay. I still maintain that proponents effort to squirt housing here, to my ghetto, while asking us to pay for even more verdant green forests in the wealthiest neighborhoods in the county is unfair.

I strongly urge people to vote no and allow for a saner alternative that accounts for the amount of money we invest in this effort, getting proper zoning applied, and enforcing maximum standards for any development that might occur. Electing a junta of five commissioners, with massive and weird authority to play with our taxes and otherwise create mischief with our money, does not seem like a gamble worth taking for such a meager special interest cause.


Christopher Grannis  //  Sat, Feb 02, 2013, 1:53 pm

Delaine,
The Chuckanut Community Forest is what is called a perched watershed. It is above the developed land all around it. The quality of the wetlands are due to the fact that there is no run off from developed areas in its watershed. Any development that creates runoff into the wetlands will degrade them and everything down stream including Padden Creek, Chuckanut Creek, and the Puget Sound. The central wetland drains to both Chuckanut Creek via hoag creek (in a culvert under Chuckanut Drive) and to Padden Creek. The Puget Sound Partnership, the state agency established to lead efforts to protect and restore Puget Sound and its diversity of life, determined one of its highest priorities is to preserve undeveloped watersheds like this one. Clean runoff into salmon streams is necessary to preserve the salmon, but not the only environmental reason to preserve the whole park.
This forest and some of the land around it together are a keystone habitat, an area large enough to sustain biodiversity that then sustains wild life throughout the corridors such as Padden Creek from salt water to Lake Padden and Connelly Creek. Dr John Mclaughlin, wildlife biologist and Huxley Professor, says the biodiversity of all Southwest Bellingham would collapse without this keystone remaining intact. There is also the issue of connectivity required by biodiversity to the Chuckanut Mountains and Chuckanut Bay. The conclusion of the Bellingham Wildlife and Habitat Assessment was that “the hundred acre wood should be preserved. Even if development occurred at six units per acre on the few acres along Chuckanut Drive that are not in the wetland watershed it would be a serious obstacle to connectivity. Those acres are also the most appropriate for human intensive park uses like mountain bike riding.
Alex,
Residents of Happy Valley which is within walking distance will also be beneficiaries of preserving wildlife and the whole park. I agree with you that Galbraith Mountain should be preserved as well. I believe the Greenways Committee has its eyes on valuable Greenway areas for environmental protection and connectivity to Galbriath. If there is enough support for preserving the Chuckanut Community Forest it will bode well for generating even more support for preserving Galbraith Mountain. Don’t give up on it yet.
Bill,
Have there ever been any development rights sold in Bellingham? I believe your assurance that money can be raised with development rights is pure fiction, but if it is possible I expect the Park District Commissioners would be happy to reduce the levy or it’s duration. Please do try to find any other funding so we can sunset the Park District asap.
The reality is that the only politically possible way to raise enough money besides the Park District is to sell the right to build very high density. The Choice is clear, Vote yes for the Park District or if the District fails there will likely be a huge high density development that will threaten this unique asset for the City of Bellingham.
Please vote yes.


Alex McLean  //  Sat, Feb 02, 2013, 9:25 pm

Hi Christopher. I categorically reject the notion, supplied frequently by Metropolitan Park District proponents, that support for preserving Chuckanut Community Forest will “bode well for generating even more support” for other, future efforts in and around this community (such as the Galbraith Mountain example I cited.)

On the contrary, many people have made the more obvious assessment that this special-interest district will effectively fracture this community’s 30-year collective effort to provide trails, parks, and open space for for EVERYONE. It would be hard to fathom how a resident in Edgemoore, having gleaned massive benefits from the three previous Greenways levies and their acquisitions, and having paid significant amounts into that fund (due to their elevated property values) would, after taxing themselves TWICE for the same property, eagerly do it again to help fund acquisitions that are not located directly in their backyards. This is the “I got mine, so to hell with you!” vector of speculation.

My central gripe with this MPD, bellowed often in these pages, is that it is unfairly trolling the wallets of Happy Valley, targeting its density to dilute the overall pain of this tax, and providing very little benefit to its residents who live up to three miles away from the deified forest. These folks, too, might suffer from either ballot fatigue or from outright disgust at having to puke up their money for the benefit of the wealthiest among us. This might be called the “To hell with you, I’ll never get mine!” argument for why voters in this District will look cross-eyed at new levies or, more likely, at a proliferation of competing MPDs jammed onto future ballots.

I am a full-bloom hippie and rarely hesitate to sign on to any effort to either protect the environment or provide us with more open space and trails. Still, 10 years from now, long after this proposal eclipses the $4 million mark (to account for the “approximately ten-percent (that) will be set aside to help pay for restoration and stewardship costs” cited in early MPD literature) I, too, might choke at the ballot box and blanch at the prospect of new taxes.

This doesn’t apply only to hippie stuff; who knows how the tax for low-income housing, recently approved by Bellingham residents, would have gone if this burden was crimping wallets and impacting individual’s decisions?

Either way, both of us have to concede that we are speculating on the unknown—I have heard others in the community, for example, who feel left out because they cannot, due to their precinct location, participate in this MPD and its tax. As amazing as Bellingham is, I really do want to harbor your enthusiasm for the foresight and fortitude of voters who, up to this point, have resoundingly supported taxing themselves for parks and trails. (Note to commissioners: Please, please, immediately provide for a donation box! And, unlike Responsible Development’s 501c.3, make sure to shovel that money directly into repayment of the Greenways endowment fund loan and not, as appears to be the case now, toward more glossy campaign fliers and yard-signs for future elections.)

Lastly, I rebuke proponents notion that this is “the only way.”

What is wrong with selling enough land to repay HALF the loan and, given five years, committing to a frenzied fund-raising effort for the remaining HALF? The City Council, deeply embarrassed by the abject failure of their Infill Toolkit efforts and tired of rejecting the proposals of mega-developers, would likely embrace any effort to provide a viable model for green building on this tract. Given the earth-quivering force of the lobby who found this property’s zoning grotesque—which still includes me—I think that a solid design taskforce could hammer out planning logistics without too much grief and, perhaps, even a bit of enthusiasm for showing us (and developers) the route toward more sustainable neighborhoods.

Proponents will never sign onto this idea, unfortunately, since they are utterly committed to keeping virtually every twig and lump of fungus in this forest intact. Among my baseline contentions is that, for $4 million, we could do a hell of a lot more in this community. I’m all for taking a breath, calmly voting no on this MPD, and looking for more equitable, realistic, and rational alternatives than this Zero Development proposal.


Bill Geyer  //  Sun, Feb 03, 2013, 9:04 am

Christopher,
Yes, thousands of TDR’s have sold in Whatcom County and Bellingham.  The most prolific buyer has been the City of Bellingham.  They own about 800 from Lake Whatcom watershed purchases.  Putting TDR’s to use within the City and its UGA remains a problem due to city code deficiencies.  The accredited (AICP) planners at City Hall are well equipped to write workable code. The problem lies with Council’s reluctance to adopt policies supporting proper use of TDR’s.

For example, BMC 18.32.050 on cluster subdivision density bonus: + Link
Too many yabutz - “yeah, we approve but you must do this”.  Council could remedy the problem with a policy permitting TDR’s in all Residential Multi zones, no other conditions attached.  It would implement our infill goal.  TDR’s would immediately become workable and their market value would increase.  This is an obvious step for Council to improve the value of TDR’s for Chuckanut Woods they could sell within 4 years. 

This is one of many options to funding other than a parks district tax.  Dr. Gibb documents 12 acres of the site can be developed, and the estimated cash from a land sale is above. Variations on this theme exist.  All can happen without forming a parks district. 

Vote NO on Proposition 1, then you and I together with others will walk into City Hall to present options to the Council.


Delaine Clizbe  //  Sun, Feb 03, 2013, 2:45 pm

Christopher,
So where do you live?  What effect does your house have on the creeks?  Oh never mind.  Just looked up your address.  You have every right to be concerned.  The proposed area to be sold and developed is in your back yard.  So you get to live there but others don’t.  hmmmmmmm?  I think you better move your house quick!  You are disrupting the flow of wildlife and your runoff is polluting Chuckanut Creek:)

Thank you for providing a segway to discussing how this little MPD could easily morph into a financing mechanism for Galbraith Mountain.  Not far fetched at all folks as it would only take 25 votes from the area to be annexed to get it on the ballot.  And since the Chuckanut Community Forest Steering Committee insisted that the MPD be run by a 5 commissioner board which is needed to operate across county lines, it really is a no brainer that this could happen.  Greenways trails connecting to Galbraith?  But Galbraith is not public land.  How will it become public land? Oh just a little additional tax onto the MPD. 

 


Northwest Citizen Release Polling of Whatcom Voters

Thu, Jul 24, 2014, 11:40 am  //  Riley Sweeney

Northwest Citizen has conducted a phone poll of likely voters, with some surprising results!

6 comments; last on Jul 29, 2014

Plan Commission & Samish Neighbors Bypassed on Rezone Docketing

Thu, Jul 24, 2014, 7:52 am  //  Dick Conoboy

In contravention of the Bellingham Municipal Code, the City Council will consider on 4 August a last minute docketing request that ignores the Planning Commission and Samish Neighborhood.

0 comments

Paper Dreams in Fairhaven

Next door to Village Books

Sunnyland Planning Process Explained - Partially

Wed, Jul 23, 2014, 10:47 pm  //  Guest writer

Guest writer Mike Rostron explains how Bellingham city planners played loose and illegal with planning processes.

0 comments

City Council Approves Resident’s Sunnyland Plan

Tue, Jul 22, 2014, 7:22 pm  //  John Servais

Sunnlyland residents win one - after a seven year effort. Planning Department failed them and all of us.

2 comments; last on Jul 23, 2014

What Landlords Need to Know about Rental Registration

Mon, Jul 21, 2014, 5:30 am  //  Guest writer

Landlords are so caught up opposing a licensing and inspection ordinance, they cannot see the upside for them in ridding the city of bad rentals.

18 comments; last on Jul 28, 2014

Sunnyland Deja Vu

Fri, Jul 18, 2014, 1:24 pm  //  Guest writer

Judith Green explains how the Bellingham Planning Department is trying to cram their plan onto a neighborhood.

5 comments; last on Jul 21, 2014

Trial by Fire:  Call to Action to Comment on the BP Pier Expansion

Sun, Jul 13, 2014, 2:26 pm  //  Terry Wechsler

Years after BP completed its north dock, the Army Corps of Engineers released a draft EIS and it's really really stupid.

0 comments

Intrado Not to Intrude in Bellingham

Tue, Jul 08, 2014, 8:20 am  //  Dick Conoboy

The city council "persuades" the city administration to withdraw a request for an intrusive police threat warning system

2 comments; last on Jul 08, 2014

Power to the Permit! (or Closely Hold This!)

Mon, Jul 07, 2014, 6:54 am  //  Terry Wechsler

It is time we stop allowing corporations to externalize the costs associated with their risky business practices, and demand more from our regulators who hold the keys to…

3 comments; last on Jul 13, 2014

Manifest Clandestine-y

Mon, Jul 07, 2014, 5:04 am  //  Guest writer

Guest writer Sandy Robson breaks the story of officials from Washington treated to a coal-promoting junket to Wyoming.

2 comments; last on Jul 13, 2014

A Question of Freedom

Fri, Jul 04, 2014, 5:00 am  //  Guest writer

Ferndale's most famous landmark is frequently commented on and is often in the news. Here is their side of the story.

4 comments; last on Jul 07, 2014

Trial by Fire: Lessons Not Learned One Year after Lac-Megantic

Wed, Jul 02, 2014, 5:14 pm  //  Terry Wechsler

On the anniversary of the Lac-Megantic disaster, communities throughout North America rally in solidarity to remember and protest wholly inadequate government response to crude-by-rail's risks.

4 comments; last on Jul 12, 2014

Sins of Omission

Fri, Jun 27, 2014, 9:01 pm  //  Guest writer

In the Weekly, Tim Johnson left out three words in quoting Craig Cole - and his story misleads readers. Guest article by Sandy Robson.

11 comments; last on Jul 01, 2014

DOJ Grant Brings Confusion and Anger to City Council Meeting

Tue, Jun 24, 2014, 10:24 am  //  Dick Conoboy

The Bellingham Police Department wants to purchase "threat assessment" software with federal monies. Citizen comments were vehement and negative. City Council confused.

5 comments; last on Jul 03, 2014

Widespread Slaughter Won’t Work

Tue, Jun 17, 2014, 10:18 pm  //  Tip Johnson

Wherein the failings of a bad policy framework are revealed

1 comments; last on Jun 19, 2014

Fireworks Ban in Bellingham in Effect as of 18 June

Tue, Jun 17, 2014, 7:53 am  //  Dick Conoboy

The possession and use of consumer fireworks are no longer permitted within the city limits.

1 comments; last on Jun 19, 2014

Herald and Weekly Withhold the News

Wed, Jun 11, 2014, 11:39 am  //  John Servais

Wyoming Senators and coal honchos were in Whatcom County June 10 - to hold a news conference with select reporters.

7 comments; last on Jun 20, 2014

Dawn Sturwold Retiring End of Month

Tue, Jun 10, 2014, 11:20 am  //  John Servais

Bellingham Hearing Examiner, Dawn Sturwold, retires in three weeks. Successor selection is hidden from all of us.

3 comments; last on Jun 11, 2014

Stay the Frack Out of Our Forearc Redux

Fri, Jun 06, 2014, 2:07 pm  //  Terry Wechsler

Part 2: Following Ken Oplinger to California, and Home Again

4 comments; last on Jun 19, 2014

The Road to Perdition

Sun, Jun 01, 2014, 12:39 am  //  Guest writer

A Venn diagram where coal, the Endangered Species Act, Republicans, and Wyoming’s Board of Education collide.

2 comments; last on Jun 02, 2014

Feint, Calumny, Solidarity

Wed, May 28, 2014, 3:15 pm  //  Guest writer

A perspective by guest writer Ellen Murphy reflects on the Whatcom Watch and the threatened law suit by Craig Cole.

22 comments; last on Jun 01, 2014

Extracting Profit and Destroying Experience: The Waterfront Plan

Tue, May 27, 2014, 1:23 am  //  Wendy Harris

Why was so little consideration given to the concept of developing the waterfront for eco-tourism?

5 comments; last on Jun 11, 2014

How Park Improvements Generate Heat

Mon, May 26, 2014, 7:51 pm  //  Wendy Harris

City park improvements have implications on the local and global scale.

2 comments; last on May 29, 2014

Montana & Wyoming to WA: Permit Coal Export Terminals… Or Else

Thu, May 22, 2014, 12:10 am  //  Guest writer

Wyoming is ready to try and legally force us to limit our environmental scoping for the Cherry Point coal terminal

4 comments; last on Jun 17, 2014

The Trojan Slaughterhouse and the Scrivener’s Errors

Sun, May 18, 2014, 11:57 pm  //  Wendy Harris

Reckless rezones and far-fetched explanations result in more slaughterhouses and meat packing plants

3 comments; last on May 20, 2014

Who Filed for Charter Review Commission?

Sat, May 17, 2014, 2:34 pm  //  Riley Sweeney

Riley takes a closer look at the Charter Review Commission candidates

2 comments; last on May 21, 2014

Bellingham’s 2013 Water Quality Report: The Facts But Not the Truth

Tue, May 13, 2014, 5:04 pm  //  Wendy Harris

Bellingham's annual water quality report indicates that city hall's propoganda machine is going strong

1 comments; last on May 14, 2014

Stay the Frack Out of Our Forearc

Sun, May 11, 2014, 2:20 pm  //  Terry Wechsler

Part 1: Introduction to the Bellingham Basin’s Potential for Fracking, Earthquakes, and Earthquakes Due to Fracking

3 comments; last on May 14, 2014

Riley scoops Herald - again

Fri, May 09, 2014, 10:02 am  //  John Servais

The Political Junkie for Whatcom County - that would be Riley Sweeney - has Overstreet not running for reelection in the 42nd.

1 comments; last on May 13, 2014

An Imminent Threat

Fri, May 09, 2014, 6:10 am  //  Terry Wechsler

Why Washington must step in and assume lead agency status in Skagit County for the Shell crude by rail proposal.

6 comments; last on Jun 21, 2014

The Whatcom Republicans’ Huge PCO Advantage

Tue, May 06, 2014, 5:52 pm  //  Riley Sweeney

The value of a Precinct Committee Officer . . .

1 comments; last on May 07, 2014

‘Legislative Sausage” or “Slaughter this Ordinance”

Mon, May 05, 2014, 3:34 pm  //  Tip Johnson

Wherein the gyrations of the bid for widespread county slaughter are exposed.

2 comments; last on May 07, 2014

Move To Amend - Persons vs Corporations

Thu, May 01, 2014, 10:21 pm  //  Guest writer

Move to Amend is a national movement to amend the U.S. Constitution and define persons as people and speech as not money.

7 comments; last on Jun 02, 2014

SweenyPolitics:  Fleetwood files against Ericksen

Wed, Apr 30, 2014, 8:20 am  //  John Servais

Riley posted this morning that Seth Fleetwood has decided to challenge Doug Ericksen for state senate in the 42nd District.

1 comments; last on Apr 30, 2014

Planning or Development Commission?

Mon, Apr 28, 2014, 6:28 am  //  Dick Conoboy

Every Bellingham Planning Commission member has ties to development or development-related businesses.

4 comments; last on Apr 30, 2014

“Friends and Neighbors”?

Mon, Apr 21, 2014, 1:59 pm  //  Terry Wechsler

A closer look at Whatcom County's industrial "stewards of the environment."

3 comments; last on Jun 25, 2014

Action Alert for Tonight: Waterfront Wildlife and Habitat Threatened

Mon, Apr 21, 2014, 11:43 am  //  Wendy Harris

The public needs to support city council and request that a waterfront habitat assessment include terrestrial species and habitat connectivity.

0 comments

Water, Water Everywhere, but ...

Sat, Apr 19, 2014, 2:57 pm  //  Terry Wechsler

or How Not to Plan for Future Generations' Water Needs

12 comments; last on Jun 30, 2014

Charter Review and District Only Voting

Thu, Apr 17, 2014, 10:40 am  //  Riley Sweeney

A simple explanation of the Charter Review and analysis of District only voting

0 comments

Roosevelt Neighborhood Pleads for Left Turns

Wed, Apr 09, 2014, 9:07 am  //  Riley Sweeney

City pushes for Alabama Street improvements, residents speak out

3 comments; last on Apr 14, 2014

Assault

Sun, Apr 06, 2014, 4:29 pm  //  Guest writer

By Christopher Grannis: Wherein despite every effort and expense, citizens cannot make the City follow the law or work for neighborhoods

2 comments; last on Apr 07, 2014

Killer Industrial Jobs or Long-term Job Killers?

Sun, Apr 06, 2014, 12:52 pm  //  Terry Wechsler

Why commenting on the EIS for Comp Plan revisions for Cherry Point means demanding an EIS in the first place.

5 comments; last on Jun 25, 2014

Anatomy of a Development Part XII - Citizens Win Against University Ridge

Wed, Apr 02, 2014, 6:00 am  //  Dick Conoboy

Ambling University Development Group pulls out. University Ridge will not be built.

12 comments; last on Apr 06, 2014

Tell County To Expand Scope of EIS Review for Plants and Animals

Tue, Apr 01, 2014, 1:27 pm  //  Wendy Harris

Please help us protect county wildlife by ensuring that the scope of the EIS review is adequate. A sample scoping letter is included.

0 comments

Public May Comment On EIS Scoping For County Comp. Plan Until April 7th

Mon, Mar 31, 2014, 2:23 am  //  Wendy Harris

The public has a week to comment on the scope of issues reviewed under the EIS.

0 comments

My State of the Lake Report for 2014

Fri, Mar 28, 2014, 1:32 am  //  Wendy Harris

On March 26, 2014 the city and county provided their update and assessment on the status of Lake Whatcom. This is mine.

2 comments; last on Apr 01, 2014

County Considers Purchasing Toxic Property

Wed, Mar 19, 2014, 10:32 am  //  Riley Sweeney

Riley digs into the county's plan to buy the county morgue

3 comments; last on Mar 24, 2014

Propaganda Replaces Public Information:  An Analysis of the Lake Whatcom TDML Process

Mon, Mar 17, 2014, 12:52 am  //  Wendy Harris

The public is not provided with a proposed plan or adequate information prior to the annual "state of the lake" meeting

4 comments; last on Mar 18, 2014

Mobile Slaughter

Sat, Mar 15, 2014, 1:11 pm  //  Tip Johnson

Wherein there's a crackdown on growing plants, and plans to let slaughter run free

2 comments; last on Mar 16, 2014

Fukushima Radiation Found In Canada

Fri, Mar 14, 2014, 10:47 am  //  John Servais

Fukushima radiation has been found 20 miles from Whatcom County farmland along the Fraser River in British Columbia.

1 comments; last on Mar 17, 2014

Is ALEC Jr. Coming to Whatcom County or Bellingham Soon?

Wed, Mar 12, 2014, 8:28 am  //  Dick Conoboy

The infamous American Legislative Exchange Council plans to send its spawn to cities and counties throughout the U.S.

1 comments; last on Mar 24, 2014

Rep. Vincent Buys Appears to Break State Fundraising Laws

Tue, Mar 11, 2014, 11:24 am  //  Riley Sweeney

Riley catches State Rep. Vincent Buys for soliciting funds during session

0 comments

County Hires GPT Permit Lead as Senior Planner

Mon, Mar 10, 2014, 10:51 am  //  Riley Sweeney

Riley digs into an unusual hiring decision at the County Planning Dept

1 comments; last on Mar 10, 2014

Whatcom Watch Editor Resigns

Sun, Mar 02, 2014, 3:22 pm  //  John Servais

The editor of the Whatcom Watch, Richard Jehn, has resigned effective today. Chalk up a victory for Craig Cole and Pacific International Terminals.

8 comments; last on Mar 05, 2014

Relevant Documents to Libel Threat

Tue, Feb 25, 2014, 9:29 pm  //  John Servais

The full text of Craig Cole's threatening letter of libel against the Whatcom Watch. And the emptiness of the threat.

16 comments; last on Mar 20, 2014

Action Alert for Tonight: Waterfront Wildlife and Habitat Not Being Protected as Promised

Mon, Feb 24, 2014, 4:33 pm  //  Wendy Harris

We were led to believe the city would review waterfront wildlife and habitat connectivity. It turns out that the city intends to focus only on nearshore fish.

0 comments

Wendy Harris on Citizen Journalism

Sat, Feb 22, 2014, 1:16 am  //  Wendy Harris

Accepting the Paul deArmond award of citizen journalism on Feb 7, Wendh Harris gave this speech. We think it deserves its own post.

0 comments

Craig Cole Threatens Libel Suit

Wed, Feb 19, 2014, 5:48 pm  //  John Servais

Craig Cole, the local contact for the proposed Cherry Point coal port has threatened the Whatcom Watch with a libel lawsuit.

6 comments; last on Mar 20, 2014

Do Changing Liquor and Marijuana Laws Affect DUIs

Mon, Feb 17, 2014, 8:26 am  //  Riley Sweeney

Riley digs through court data and discovers the real impact of privatization and legalization

0 comments

Bellingham Seeks “Flexibility” To Sell Wholesale Rural Sewer Services

Sun, Feb 09, 2014, 10:35 pm  //  Wendy Harris

The mayor wants to amend a city law to increase flexibility for a GMA provision that should be used rarely, if ever at all.

3 comments; last on Feb 11, 2014

 

Election Info

Candidate Filings


Whatcom Auditor

Coal, Oil & Trains

Community Wise Bellingham

Powder River Basin R. C.

Local Blogs & News

Bellingham Herald

Bham Herald Politics Blog
Bham Politics & Economics
Cascadia Weekly
Ferndale Record
Friends of Whatcom
Get Whatcom Planning
KGMI
Latte Republic
League of Women Voters
Lynden Tribune
MikeatthePort
Northern Light

Twilight Zoning
Western Front - WWU
Whatcom Watch

Local Causes

Chuckanut Community Forest

City Club of Bellingham
Conservation NW
Futurewise - Whatcom
Lake Whatcom
Lummi Island Quarry
N. Cascades Audubon
NW Holocaust Center
RE Sources
Reduce Jet Noise
Salish Sea Org.
Save the Granary Building
Transition Whatcom
WA Conservation Voters

Governments

Bellingham

Port of Bellingham
Skagit County
US - The White House
WA State Access
WA State Elections
WA State Legislature
Whatcom Auditor
Whatcom Auditor
Whatcom County

Weather & Climate

Cliff Mass Weather Blog

Climate Audit
NW Radar
Two day forecast
Watts Up With That? - climate

Leisure

Adventures NW

Edge of Sports
Entertainment NNW
Famous Internet Skiers
Recreation Northwest
Sailing Anarchy

Good Web Sites

Al-Jazeera online

Alaska Dispatch
AlterNet.org
Antiwar.com
Arab News
Asia Times
Atlantic, The

Common Dreams
counterpunch
Crosscut Seattle
Daily Kos
Daily Mirror
Doonesbury
Drudge Report
FiveThirtyEight
Foreign Policy in Focus
GlobalPost
Guardian Unlimited
Gulf News
Haaretz
Huffington Post
Innocence Project, The
Intrnational Herald Tribune
James Fallows
Jerusalem Post
Joel Connelly
Juan Cole
Julia Ioffe/New Republic
Le Diplo
Media Matters
Michael Moore
Middle East Times
MoveOn.org
Nation, The
New American Century
News Trust
NMFA
numbers
Online Journal
Palestine Daily
Palestine News
Paul Krugman - economics
Personal bio info
Portland Indy Media
Progressive Review
Project Vote Smart
Reuters
Sea Shepherd
Slate
Stand for the Troops
Talking Points Memo
TED
The Crisis Papers
the Oatmeal
Tom Paine.com
truthout
Vox
War and Piece
Washington Votes
WikiLeaks.ch
ynetnews.com

NwCitizen 1995 - 2007

Early Northwest Citizen

Quiet, Offline or Dead

Bellingham Police Activity

Bellingham Register
Bob Sanders
Carl Weimer
Chuckanut Mountains
Citizen Ted
Citizens of Bellingham
Cordata & Meridian
David Hackworth
Facebook Port Reform
HamsterTalk
Jack Petree
N. Sound Conservancy
No Leaky Buckets
Northwest Review
Orcinus
Post-Oklahoman Confessions
Protect Bellingham Parks
The American Telegraph
Wally Wonders