Check the Protect Bellingham Parks Website

Permalink +

Wed, Feb 06, 2013, 10:42 pm  //  John Servais

If you are still considering how to vote on the Chuckanut Park issue, please check over at the website of the official opposition.  They have added more information on why a vote NO is the most common sense action.  The link to their website is also in the right column, but can be easily missed. 

Protect Bellingham Parks

This special factional Chuckanut Park ballot measure sends a negative message of not trusting our Greenways and Parks Departments.  If we love our green environments then a vote NO is the better action.  Passage of this will hurt future Greenways levy ballot measures.  Check out the opposition website and be fully informed before voting.

Update:  If you have decided to vote NO, then you might want to help the cause.  Email Bill Geyer at: 

billgeyer@comcast.net

or

info@protectbellinghamparks.com

and join in these last days to help turn out the No vote.  

Hue Beattie  //  Wed, Feb 06, 2013, 11:00 pm

too bad you didn’t devote this much space and energy on the 3 to 5 for the port last year. It only went down by a small amount.


John Erickson  //  Thu, Feb 07, 2013, 7:45 am

I just knew that you could not let a day go by without fanning the flames! Looking forward to the 12th, maybe then we can talk about something else.


John Servais  //  Thu, Feb 07, 2013, 8:45 am

These pages have been open to the organizers of the petition - but they have chosen to not submit but one article.  This is an issue of my neighborhood - and it intends to tax me for what is folly.  I have walked Chuckanut Ridge for decades and used these pages as far back as 1996 to fight against the development of the 1,300 plus housing units on the sensitive areas.  And I have always - for decades - known that some of the dry and almost level land along Chuckanut Drive was perfect for 20 to 40 fine homes. 

Directly across the street are homes now - many owned by proponents of the park who would deny others to live just across the street from them.  Fan the flames?  You and proponents are meeting this Saturday morning to doorbell my neighbors.  You want me to give up and leave the final week to you?  Sorry, John and Hue, it does not work that way.  The tool I have is this website and I will use it. 

You proponents refuse to address the points we have raised.  Proponents prefer to repeat two false statements - that the forest needs to be saved and that this is our last chance.  In truth, the forest is already saved and owned by the city and we have five years to find a common community wide process for the city to repay the loan to itself.  This park tax is overkill and a waste of our money.  And will hurt future Greenways levy chances. 


David Marshak  //  Thu, Feb 07, 2013, 3:03 pm

Last week, John, you maligned the Greenways Advisory Committee by claiming that we had a “culture of secrecy.”

Today you say that the Chuckanut Community Forest initiative says that we don’t trust “our Greenways.”

Let me see if I understand. You want us to trust our Greenways projects but you don’t trust the people actually working on the projects?

By the way, John, what would you like to know about the Greenways Advisory Committee’s activities? I’d be happy to answer your questions to the best of my knowledge.


John Servais  //  Thu, Feb 07, 2013, 3:32 pm

We can be critical of our local agencies and should put our political action towards improving them.  Yes, in my opinion, the Greenways discusses too much in executive sessions.  More than one current member agrees with me and says they are working for more transparency. 

A citizen criticizing their government agencies is not maligning them.  It is called speaking out and I practice it.  However, I also treasure our legitimate local governments and do not want to see their roles displaced by factional agencies.  This Park District is an example of a factional agency.

I urge those voting NO on this issue to also vote for Anna Williams.  She is also against this Park District but realizes that if it is formed then we need at least one representative on the board to represent us.  Anna has a good grasp of financial affairs and is conservative in the classic sense.


Delaine Clizbe  //  Thu, Feb 07, 2013, 3:39 pm

Ok let me get this straight.  The proponents want us to believe the the “sky is falling” and that if we do not do something the land will be sold.  The COB has made it clear that the loan from the Greenways Endowment has to be paid back by 2017.  The Proponents are proposing that this little MPD will charge a .28/1000 tax starting in 2014 and that the tax will need to run for 10 years.

By 2017 they will have only collected three years of tax.  How on earth are they going to pay off the loan in time? 


One other thing.  The proponents claim that they are doing this to pay off the land and they want a “conservation easement” in return.  The last Conservation Easement that I saw in negotiation was between Whatcom County Parks Director Mike McFarland and Rand Jack of Whatcom Land Trust over the Lake Whatcom Reconveyance land.  The going rate at that time, about a year ago, was $50,000 for 8000+acres ($6.25 per acre)and would cover the land into perpetuity. 

At that rate, the easement on 82 acres should be about $512.50 The proponents are suggesting we pay 3.2 million plus whatever the interest adds up to be for a conservation easement on 82 acres of land.  It seems to me that they are going to pay at least $3,199,487.50 too much!

 

 


Tip Johnson  //  Fri, Feb 08, 2013, 4:37 pm

What a cheerful little project!


Alex McLean  //  Fri, Feb 08, 2013, 9:59 pm

The “legitimate rape” aspects of this MPD, whereby proponents presume that Happy Valley’s density and fleeting college students were “just asking for it,” tends to knock the harmonious good cheer off of this otherwise worthy cause.

If these folks had found a way to pony up ANY MONEY AT ALL—such as the $1 million they used to be committed to raising—then this would feel a lot more like good date proposed by an ardent suitor. As it stands, however, my neighborhood is getting hornswoggled by a massive campaign effort which aims to perfume the stench of economic injustice that radiates from these presumptuous and demanding charmers. Once clobbered into submission to this overbearing proposal, we’ll be asked to effectively codify, through the ball-n-chain of our tax dollars, that we cannot flirt with any of the other cute forests or environmental causes in and around the District. “Save OUR forest!” therefore elevates to law the already extraordinary privilege and attention that we have showered upon this one, dumb, noisy, belligerent hunk of handsome but poorly-mannered property.

After getting knocked up, after getting forced into marriage to this lummox, we only have to wait 10 years for a chance to start initiating our divorce papers. Given how pushy and greedy the proposal already is, I have no doubt that the greed and malice behind sucking dollars from the densest neighborhood in town (we may be “dense”, but that doesn’t make us “easy!”) will entice further bludgeoning and abuse from proponents who have proven, beyond doubt, that they care about nothing but themselves and their own gratification.

When I CHOOSE to give money to a cause, I want it to be a cheerful occasion.

As “our” purchase of this small slice of absurdly expensive forest will benefit such precious and few people, I gain no joy from having this uninspired proposal kicked down my throat. If this issue was somehow not divisive in the past, as some folks ambitiously like to believe, then I can promise that 10 years (or 20, or 30, 40 ...) of paying my dowry to the rich and fanatical in this town will, assuredly, cement the bitterness of the rift that others, somehow, claim does not exist between us.


Dan Pike  //  Sat, Feb 09, 2013, 11:16 am

Alex,

Disappointing to see this level of invective and hyperbole thrown at proponents and the MPD.  I’m sure John will be along shortly to chastise you.

There are good arguments to be made on both sides of this issue.  You’ve made some good anit points yourself, in earlier postings.  My own perspective is that, on balance, the MPD makes good sense.  The City has been clear that future Greenways funds are not available; I know from education and experience that TDRs are extremely unlikely to work as a funding mechanism; and I know that selling a significant piece of Chuckanut Ridge remains the viable alternative to this plan.

Many are okay with selling some part; I gather you are among them.  That is a legitimate perspective.  If you want to save all the property, a Yes vote is the right vote.

At the end of the voting, we will all still be neighbors.  It would be nice if we could not feel inflamed about each other over this vote, and because of excessive invective.

Thanks,
Dan


Alex McLean  //  Sat, Feb 09, 2013, 4:36 pm

Dan,

As your neighbor, as a member of this community, I greatly look forward to marching beside you as you continue your efforts to thwart the coal trains that threaten our city and lifestyles here.

As chastening as it is to get scolded by a former mayor, however, I have to take issue with the use of the word “hyperbole” in describing my diatribes.

It is an absolute fact that Dan Remsen, the lead proponent for this MPD, visited both the Greenways Advisory Committee and the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board. When he did so, and when asked why the district’s boundaries were drawn to engulf the hinterlands of Happy Valley, he very calmly explained that this was an economic calculation, pure and simple, to flatten the financial impacts of this tax and spread it to thousands of people who, geographically, are clearly not the prime beneficiaries of saving this bit of land from development. The proponents might want Happy Valley’s votes—assuredly they do—but they are mostly interested in our dollars. I find that outright fact of this proposal to be both crass and revolting, divisive by definition, and I don’t see how the proponent’s silence and piety (class warfare is too icky to discuss, but it is just fine to wage?) empowers you or anyone else to label my gripes as “invective.”

If it comforts you any, I am well aware that my kicking sand upon the picnic of well-respected environmentalists in this town will make a pariah of me for years to come. I’ve painted this bulls-eye on my back in neon and it gets bigger every day.

Still, that doesn’t make me—or my vituperative defense of my neighborhood—worthy of your or anyone else’s long-term inflammation. I can vote no, as you said, or I can shut up for 10 years and dutifully pay the tax.

What I can’t do is simply sit here and benignly agree with you and other proponents as you attempt to rinse your hands of a hastily-cobbled-together purchase, and all of its lingering impacts, with an even more slap-dash effort to pay off the debt to Greenways that this purchase has incurred.

I’d like to agree with you.
But then we would both be wrong.


Delaine Clizbe  //  Sat, Feb 09, 2013, 6:45 pm

Alex,
I appreciate your standing up to a situation that is wrong!  You are the better man!

I almost didn’t come to your door the other day due to your “no coal” sign out front.  Truth is that although folks label themselves and others, we are very rarely just one thing.  I call myself a conservative and yet I like wind power…..gasp!

Besides that, your writing is awesome!  Not sure why Pike continues to try to out write and out debate you!

Keep up the good work!


Delaine Clizbe  //  Sun, Feb 10, 2013, 9:01 am

Alex,
Check out the article in today’s Herald about the community gardens in Happy Valley.  That may very well answer your question: “why include Happy Valley?”.

+ Link


How much you want to bet that the MPD, if put into place will take on the management fees and possibly even purchase these gardens.

Here is another “project” the MPD could possibly fund.  + Link

Scroll down to the post on June 2, 2010.  To find Hue Beattie’s little pet project:

The second pocket park of Happy Valley is located on the corner of 21st Street and Larrabee Avenue. This park has a pond that is about 40 feet in diameter for runoff water coming from parking lots nearby. Beattie said residents of Stanford Apartments use this area as a permaculture landscape, or edible landscape. The area provides food such as nuts and berries for the people and wildlife around it. The Happy Valley Neighborhood Association, + Link tried to propose a plan for this area to become a community garden, but the Parks and Recreation Department decided it was too small.

Yes, someone came and cleared the blackberry patch out and then left the land to be overgrown again with blackberries.  There are no nut trees on the property.  The “pond” is a retention pond for the Adrik Place apartments, surely now critical habitat!  Yes the racoons and the rats use the blackberry patch to build “freeways” from the pond to peoples trash cans. 

How much will this little pet project cost the taxpayers?


John Servais  //  Sun, Feb 10, 2013, 10:31 am

Delaine, your prediction or assessment of some probable actions if the mini park district is voted into being is correct.  The new commissioners, regardless of verbal commitments, are wonderful uber enviros who will suddenly realize they have the power to increase the tax and right any number of old wrongs and “do good” where they have been stymied in the past. 

There is absolutely no doubt they will come under pressure from many of their supporters to do more.  The cry will be they have a mandate to do more - that now is the time and again we will hear the words “last chance” to save this and that and that over there.  And the tax will go up. 

I have lived in Happy Valley and Fairhaven for over well over 30 years.  And go back to the 1960s in knowing some of the strongest proponents.  They are good people who intend the best but are slaves to a uber green enviro belief system that is religion to them.  They do not even understand how asking many poor families in Happy Valley to fund excessive park land is cruel.  They do not understand asking the rest of us to buy land right next to their own properties is selfish on their part.

I am a lifelong enviro and they all know that.  I have fought for preventing the gross development of over 1,400 condo units on Chuckanut Ridge for far longer than many of them.  I warned them in the 1990s and they took no urgent action when we could have had the property much cheaper.  Now the sensitive Chuckanut Ridge is saved and they are greedy for excessive park so as to have nothing but forest next to their homes.  This is the sad truth of their mini Park District.  They are not satisfied with saving the ridge, wetlands, trail connection corridors and stream beds. 

And this greed for more and more will result in them saying yes to more projects that will increase the property tax on those who cannot afford higher taxes.  The proponents gerrymandered their tax district, avoiding the wealthy Samish neighborhood that is close to the park because they knew that neighborhood would vote resoundingly no.  Yet parts of Happy Valley neighborhood are much further from Chuckanut Ridge than are parts of the Samish neighborhood.  A revealing example of the unfair and deceitful nature of this ballot measure.

Neighbors - as a strong enviro and one who has fought to save Chuckanut Ridge since 1996, I urge you to vote NO on the misguided parks district.  Chuckanut Ridge is already saved.


Alex McLean  //  Sun, Feb 10, 2013, 6:06 pm

I’ve been aware that the “Happy Valley Community Garden” was on private land for some time and have brought this to the attention of Greenways. My question, which applies also to the commercial zoning of virtually all of the Waterfront District’s proposed parks, is why these areas appear green—as in public/open space—on our maps when, in reality, they have potentially fleeting use as a public resource. The City may address this through map inventories in coming months to provide better information about potential long-term uses and impacts to connectivity, secured non-motorized transportation corridors, and overall functionality of our trails and open space.

The Happy Valley Community Garden provides the only contiguous trail connection to 32nd St., from East to West, to our neighborhood’s only significant trail corridor, the Connelly Creek Nature Area. While there is another portal buried down on MacKenzie, the difference between walking through a developed cul de-sac and directly into someone’s backyard vs. a designated trailhead is psychologically significant; one feels inviting and could encourage use, the other feels like trespassing and has a buried trailhead at an imposing dead-end street. Although the Herald article implies there is no crisis of immanent development, it is noteworthy that there is no permanent easement or any other arrangement for public access through this privately owned garden.

As I noted in my manifesto encouraging garden plots atop the Downtown Bellingham Parkade, our local parking garage with a perpetually vacant top floor, it is a fact that the only regions in this nation where agriculture acreage is expanding are located in our urban areas. Gardening, especially in dense cities, has taken off exponentially in the past decade. This is not so much a hippie thing as just a practical reality of hobbyists and dabblers latching onto (or forcing) access to food security, local production, and a new-found desire to know where our food comes from.

It would be a drag if the Happy Valley garden is developed some day as it seems to be a wildly popular resource for this community.

What this sidebar discussion illustrates most, however, is that Happy Valley is about to pump all of its park and open space resources into acquiring a few winsome and undefined acres three miles away from our densest population centers at WWU’s housing cores and Sehome’s apartment and condo blocks. Besides living under an acquisition moratorium for much of this current Greenways levy, imposed for the sake of enshrining the sacredness of Chuckanut Ridge over all other worthy properties, we now will be taxing ourselves twice to secure the same plot of land which will benefit us not barely a bit.

Those who vote yes for this MPD, I contend, will also be voting to ensure that no resources—for at least 10 years, 20, or 30—will be allotted to our Happy Valley neighborhood, the densest neighborhood in Bellingham, and its trails and open space needs. Although I have little doubt that the powerful juggernaut of publicity, campaign flyers, yard-signs, door-belling, and gibberish-laden speeches will prevail during Tuesday’s vote, I still want to carve a spot on the record where, decades from now, we can point to this vote as being the moment where the ghettos in Happy Valley gave their political voice to THREE commissioners whose sole fixation is to lard further fat upon their narrowly defined Park District and its even narrower group of beneficiaries.

I’d vote yes if this proposal were less selfish and greedy.

Since it is not, I will retain my own selfishness and greed by voting NO and hoping that a better proposal will arise to protect my neighborhood and its taxpayers from future Ponzi schemes and manipulations of this sort.


Hue Beattie  //  Sun, Feb 10, 2013, 8:51 pm

The student blog article is not correct. I said it “could” be planted.Just trying to make more gardens.This has nothing to do with the M.P.D.


Charter Review and District Only Voting

Thu, Apr 17, 2014, 9:40 am  //  Riley Sweeney

A simple explanation of the Charter Review and analysis of District only voting

0 comments

Roosevelt Neighborhood Pleads for Left Turns

Wed, Apr 09, 2014, 8:07 am  //  Riley Sweeney

City pushes for Alabama Street improvements, residents speak out

3 comments; last on Apr 14, 2014

Paper Dreams in Fairhaven

Next door to Village Books

Assault

Sun, Apr 06, 2014, 3:29 pm  //  Guest writer

By Christopher Grannis: Wherein despite every effort and expense, citizens cannot make the City follow the law or work for neighborhoods

2 comments; last on Apr 07, 2014

Killer Industrial Jobs or Long-term Job Killers?

Sun, Apr 06, 2014, 11:52 am  //  Terry Wechsler

Why commenting on the EIS in Comp Plan revisions for Cherry Point means demanding an EIS in the first place.

4 comments; last on Apr 13, 2014

Anatomy of a Development Part XII - Citizens Win Against University Ridge

Wed, Apr 02, 2014, 5:00 am  //  Dick Conoboy

Ambling University Development Group pulls out. University Ridge will not be built.

12 comments; last on Apr 06, 2014

Tell County To Expand Scope of EIS Review for Plants and Animals

Tue, Apr 01, 2014, 12:27 pm  //  Wendy Harris

Please help us protect county wildlife by ensuring that the scope of the EIS review is adequate. A sample scoping letter is included.

0 comments

Public May Comment On EIS Scoping For County Comp. Plan Until April 7th

Mon, Mar 31, 2014, 1:23 am  //  Wendy Harris

The public has a week to comment on the scope of issues reviewed under the EIS.

0 comments

My State of the Lake Report for 2014

Fri, Mar 28, 2014, 12:32 am  //  Wendy Harris

On March 26, 2014 the city and county provided their update and assessment on the status of Lake Whatcom. This is mine.

2 comments; last on Apr 01, 2014

County Considers Purchasing Toxic Property

Wed, Mar 19, 2014, 9:32 am  //  Riley Sweeney

Riley digs into the county's plan to buy the county morgue

3 comments; last on Mar 24, 2014

Propaganda Replaces Public Information:  An Analysis of the Lake Whatcom TDML Process

Sun, Mar 16, 2014, 11:52 pm  //  Wendy Harris

The public is not provided with a proposed plan or adequate information prior to the annual "state of the lake" meeting

4 comments; last on Mar 18, 2014

Mobile Slaughter

Sat, Mar 15, 2014, 12:11 pm  //  Tip Johnson

Wherein there's a crackdown on growing plants, and plans to let slaughter run free

2 comments; last on Mar 16, 2014

Fukushima Radiation Found In Canada

Fri, Mar 14, 2014, 9:47 am  //  John Servais

Fukushima radiation has been found 20 miles from Whatcom County farmland along the Fraser River in British Columbia.

1 comments; last on Mar 17, 2014

Is ALEC Jr. Coming to Whatcom County or Bellingham Soon?

Wed, Mar 12, 2014, 7:28 am  //  Dick Conoboy

The infamous American Legislative Exchange Council plans to send its spawn to cities and counties throughout the U.S.

1 comments; last on Mar 24, 2014

Rep. Vincent Buys Appears to Break State Fundraising Laws

Tue, Mar 11, 2014, 10:24 am  //  Riley Sweeney

Riley catches State Rep. Vincent Buys for soliciting funds during session

0 comments

County Hires GPT Permit Lead as Senior Planner

Mon, Mar 10, 2014, 9:51 am  //  Riley Sweeney

Riley digs into an unusual hiring decision at the County Planning Dept

1 comments; last on Mar 10, 2014

Whatcom Watch Editor Resigns

Sun, Mar 02, 2014, 2:22 pm  //  John Servais

The editor of the Whatcom Watch, Richard Jehn, has resigned effective today. Chalk up a victory for Craig Cole and Pacific International Terminals.

8 comments; last on Mar 05, 2014

Relevant Documents to Libel Threat

Tue, Feb 25, 2014, 8:29 pm  //  John Servais

The full text of Craig Cole's threatening letter of libel against the Whatcom Watch. And the emptiness of the threat.

16 comments; last on Mar 20, 2014

Action Alert for Tonight: Waterfront Wildlife and Habitat Not Being Protected as Promised

Mon, Feb 24, 2014, 3:33 pm  //  Wendy Harris

We were led to believe the city would review waterfront wildlife and habitat connectivity. It turns out that the city intends to focus only on nearshore fish.

0 comments

Wendy Harris on Citizen Journalism

Sat, Feb 22, 2014, 12:16 am  //  Wendy Harris

Accepting the Paul deArmond award of citizen journalism on Feb 7, Wendh Harris gave this speech. We think it deserves its own post.

0 comments

Craig Cole Threatens Libel Suit

Wed, Feb 19, 2014, 4:48 pm  //  John Servais

Craig Cole, the local contact for the proposed Cherry Point coal port has threatened the Whatcom Watch with a libel lawsuit.

6 comments; last on Mar 20, 2014

Do Changing Liquor and Marijuana Laws Affect DUIs

Mon, Feb 17, 2014, 7:26 am  //  Riley Sweeney

Riley digs through court data and discovers the real impact of privatization and legalization

0 comments

Bellingham Seeks “Flexibility” To Sell Wholesale Rural Sewer Services

Sun, Feb 09, 2014, 9:35 pm  //  Wendy Harris

The mayor wants to amend a city law to increase flexibility for a GMA provision that should be used rarely, if ever at all.

3 comments; last on Feb 11, 2014

The Hidden Costs of Costco

Sun, Feb 09, 2014, 2:36 pm  //  Wendy Harris

Costco imposes indirect costs on our community that are as real and tangible as road construction expenses.

1 comments; last on Feb 13, 2014

Reid Boiler Works Burns Down

Sun, Feb 09, 2014, 9:13 am  //  John Servais

The old empty Reid Boiler Works industrial building in Fairhaven burned to the ground Saturday night.

0 comments

Panem et Circenses - Why I Did Not Watch “The Super Bowl”

Mon, Feb 03, 2014, 5:30 am  //  Dick Conoboy

Professional and even college sports have morphed into a circus of corporate greed and the fleecing of the public.

3 comments; last on Mar 01, 2014

Have You Exceeded Your Right To Information?

Sat, Feb 01, 2014, 12:35 am  //  Wendy Harris

Filing a public record request could land a citizen in jail under a proposal reflected in a Herald opinion article.

2 comments; last on Feb 03, 2014

Wendy Harris Receives deArmond Award for Citizen Journalism

Wed, Jan 29, 2014, 6:18 am  //  Guest writer

Tim Johnson writes about the first recipient of the Paul deArmond Citizen Journalism award, Whatcom County writer Wendy Harris.

3 comments; last on Feb 08, 2014

Anatomy of a Development Part XI - The Doldrums at University Ridge

Mon, Jan 20, 2014, 5:14 am  //  Dick Conoboy

The developers of University Ridge have been silent since shortly after the hearing examiner's decision on 23 October last year. Will they walk?

0 comments

The Marijuana Bowl

Sun, Jan 19, 2014, 8:39 pm  //  John Servais

Super Bowl ... Weed Bowl ... This bud's for you ... Bong Bowl ... Marijuana Bowl ... whatever. It is on!

1 comments; last on Jan 20, 2014

Port’s Alternative Marina Analysis a Scam

Tue, Jan 14, 2014, 2:19 pm  //  Guest writer

Do we actually need to say that we, as citizens, want accurate information from government officials?

1 comments; last on Jan 14, 2014

City too Poor for Power Pennies or Discrimination?

Fri, Dec 27, 2013, 4:00 am  //  Guest writer

Guest writer Barbara Perry writes about Bellingham Parks refusal to allow motorized wheel chairs to recharge at public electrical outlets.

6 comments; last on Jan 03, 2014

Port Memo Addresses Marina Fraud Allegations

Fri, Dec 20, 2013, 3:56 pm  //  Wendy Harris

A Port of Bellingham internal memo tries, but fails, to justify changes in cost estimates for alternative marina sites.

5 comments; last on Dec 22, 2013

Lummi Influence Over the Waterfront Planning Process Continues to Grow

Tue, Dec 17, 2013, 12:21 am  //  Wendy Harris

Army Corps advised DOE that it will not issue a waterfront permit without Lummi approval

2 comments; last on Jan 13, 2014

Gary Jensen Not Running for State Senate

Mon, Dec 16, 2013, 12:30 pm  //  John Servais

Ferndale Mayor Gary Jensen has decided not to file for the 42nd state Senate seat currently held by Doug Ericksen.

5 comments; last on Dec 24, 2013

Larrabee School; Its Future

Mon, Dec 09, 2013, 12:24 pm  //  Guest writer

Barbara Perry writes about the closed nature of the Bellingham School Board on the future of the Larrabee School.

1 comments; last on Dec 15, 2013

Steal this Waterfront: Costs without Benefit

Sat, Dec 07, 2013, 8:23 pm  //  Tip Johnson

Wherein the direct, indirect, hidden and lost opportunity costs make this a waterfront boondoggle of billions

3 comments; last on Dec 11, 2013

On Monday, City Council Votes “third and final” Approval of Waterfront Plan

Sat, Dec 07, 2013, 12:33 pm  //  Wendy Harris

Local activist calls on Bellingham City Council to table the unpopular waterfront plans and engage in meaningful public process

2 comments; last on Dec 08, 2013

Lecture on County Water Issues Draws Crowd

Fri, Dec 06, 2013, 11:03 pm  //  Wendy Harris

The county will be required to consider water quality and water quantity when planning rural growth.

3 comments; last on Dec 10, 2013

Video Exposes City Council Dysfunction on Waterfront Plan

Thu, Dec 05, 2013, 11:58 am  //  John Servais

The Political Junkie has posted a 3 minute video showing Bellingham City Council members explaining their idiocy for all of us to watch.

2 comments; last on Dec 06, 2013

The Bellingham “Riot” - Let’s Expand the Conversation

Thu, Dec 05, 2013, 5:00 am  //  Dick Conoboy

The post "riot" conversation is terribly lacking in several areas. We must expand the discussion or risk learning little from the experience.

3 comments; last on Dec 15, 2013

Cascadia Weekly Blasts Waterfront Plan

Wed, Dec 04, 2013, 10:53 am  //  John Servais

Bellingham City Council and Port of Bellingham finalize the waterfront plan. In his weekly Gristle, Tim Johnson blasts the corrupt public process.

4 comments; last on Dec 05, 2013

Waterfront Development Bonus Yet Another Bad Idea

Sat, Nov 30, 2013, 8:11 pm  //  Wendy Harris

The waterfront plan allows a development bonus for payments made to the Lake Whatcom land acquisition fund

1 comments; last on Dec 01, 2013

City and Port Ready To Act on Waterfront Plan

Fri, Nov 29, 2013, 9:43 pm  //  Wendy Harris

A number of important issues need to be resolved before waterfront planning is complete, but the city council and port commission are ready to act.

2 comments; last on Nov 30, 2013

Port Unable To Protect Public Safety

Fri, Nov 22, 2013, 9:01 pm  //  Wendy Harris

If the port can not construct the airport safely, should it be entrusted with dangerous waterfront cleanup work?

0 comments

Walmart and McDonald’s - Partners in Institutionalized Cluelessness

Wed, Nov 20, 2013, 5:03 am  //  Dick Conoboy

The advice coming from Walmart and McDonald's to its low paid employees becomes more and more bizarre and inane.

0 comments

Anatomy of a Development - Part X Appeals of the Hearing Examiner’s Decision

Tue, Nov 19, 2013, 5:35 am  //  Dick Conoboy

Ambling's motion to the hearing examiner for reconsideration was definitively rejected. The developer has not met the deadline for an appeal to the Superior Court

0 comments

Smoking Gun: Fraud and Deception

Mon, Nov 18, 2013, 2:18 pm  //  Guest writer

In which we find the hidden core of the waterfront plan is rotten through and through

7 comments; last on Nov 21, 2013

County Releases EIS, Prepares to Purchase Jail Site

Mon, Nov 18, 2013, 10:59 am  //  Riley Sweeney

The county takes two big steps forward on the new jail, while still missing the point

0 comments

Noballmacare and Setting the False Standard

Thu, Nov 14, 2013, 1:39 am  //  Tip Johnson

Dear Mr. President, There's a sucker born every minute, and two to take him.

7 comments; last on Nov 21, 2013

City Council Misled On Waterfront Planning

Wed, Nov 13, 2013, 3:16 pm  //  Wendy Harris

The city adminstration has been providing misleading/ incorrect information to the city council to avoid waterfront plan revisions.

1 comments; last on Nov 18, 2013

Election Analysis: What Happened with the Port Races?

Tue, Nov 12, 2013, 10:21 am  //  Riley Sweeney

Riley crunches the numbers on Renata and McAuley's races to find answers

2 comments; last on Nov 13, 2013

Puget Neighborhood Likely New Home for 1,300 Students

Tue, Nov 12, 2013, 5:16 am  //  Dick Conoboy

Puget Neighborhood will likely have in the immediate future 1,300 new rental units that will be marketed primarily to the student population.

0 comments

Gloomy Fate For Waterfront Wildlife

Sat, Nov 09, 2013, 9:47 pm  //  Wendy Harris

The COB administration continues in its refusal to analyze waterfront wildlife issues, even though this is a prerequisite step in protecting wildlife from the impacts of development

3 comments; last on Nov 10, 2013

Election Results - November 2013

Tue, Nov 05, 2013, 8:21 pm  //  John Servais

With lots of outside county money flowing in to our local races, this election is weird. But real - and we county residents have spoken.

11 comments; last on Nov 09, 2013

Health Insurance Scams - Washington Not Spared

Mon, Nov 04, 2013, 9:55 am  //  Dick Conoboy

The call of the dollar speaks more loudly to health insurance companies than does the voice and well-being of the consumer, even here in Washington.

8 comments; last on Nov 06, 2013

Anatomy of a Development - Part IX BMC Rule of Three Thwarts Plans

Thu, Oct 31, 2013, 10:19 am  //  Dick Conoboy

Four bedroom dorm rooms have been nixed by the hearing examiner. University Ridge may be in trouble as a cash cow for Ambling Development of Georgia

3 comments; last on Nov 04, 2013

The Slaughterhouse Referendum - Citizens Opposing Widespread Slaughter (COWS)

Mon, Oct 28, 2013, 10:19 pm  //  Tip Johnson

Wherein we discover why we exert our rights - and grab some more petitions before it's too late

3 comments; last on Nov 06, 2013

Dick’s Picks for City Council - Burr and Petree

Mon, Oct 28, 2013, 12:00 am  //  Dick Conoboy

Independent voters are for independent thinkers on the city council. Vote for Burr and Petree.

0 comments

Boulevard Park Reopens

Sat, Oct 26, 2013, 7:36 pm  //  John Servais

Beach reconstruction is done at Boulevard Park on the Bellingham waterfront. Paths along shore are again open - and it looks good.

6 comments; last on Nov 01, 2013

Ken Bell and Renata for Port

Sun, Oct 20, 2013, 7:07 pm  //  John Servais

Ken Bell has my vote over Mike McAuley for port commissioner. And Renata Kowalczyk has it over Dan Robbins.

8 comments; last on Oct 30, 2013

 

New Links

Julia Ioffe/New Republic
the Oatmeal

Current Interest

Community Wise Bellingham
counterpunch
Friends of Whatcom
Guardian Unlimited
Lummi Island Quarry
Reconveyance Challenge
Whatcom Elections

Publisher Recommended

counterpunch
GlobalPost
Guardian Unlimited
League of Women Voters
Paul Krugman - economics
Sweeney Politics

Local Blogs & News

Bellingham Herald
Bham Herald Politics Blog
Bham Politics & Economics
Bob Sanders
Cascadia Weekly
Citizen Ted
Ferndale Record
Friends of Whatcom
Get Whatcom Planning
HamsterTalk
Jack Petree
KGMI
Latte Republic
League of Women Voters
Lynden Tribune
MikeatthePort
Northern Light
Sweeney Politics
Twilight Zoning
Wally Wonders
Western Front - WWU
Whatcom Watch

Local Causes

Bellingham Police Activity
Chuckanut Community Forest
Chuckanut Mountains
Citizens of Bellingham
City Club of Bellingham
Community Wise Bellingham
Conservation NW
Cordata & Meridian
Facebook Port Reform
Futurewise - Whatcom
Lake Whatcom
Lummi Island Quarry
N. Cascades Audubon
NW Holocaust Center
RE Sources
Reconveyance Challenge
Reduce Jet Noise
Salish Sea Org.
Save the Granary Building
Transition Whatcom
WA Conservation Voters

Governments

Bellingham
Port of Bellingham
Skagit County
US - The White House
WA State Access
WA State Elections
WA State Legislature
Whatcom Auditor
Whatcom County
Whatcom Elections

Weather & Climate

Cliff Mass Weather Blog
Climate Audit
NW Radar
Two day forecast
Watts Up With That? - climate

Leisure

Adventures NW
Edge of Sports
Entertainment NNW
Famous Internet Skiers
Sailing Anarchy

Good Links

Al-Jazeera online
Alaska Dispatch
AlterNet.org
Antiwar.com
Arab News
Asia Times
Atlantic, The
Common Dreams
counterpunch
Crosscut Seattle
Daily Kos
Daily Mirror
Doonesbury
Drudge Report
FiveThirtyEight
Foreign Policy in Focus
GlobalPost
Guardian Unlimited
Gulf News
Haaretz
Huffington Post
Innocence Project, The
Intrnational Herald Tribune
James Fallows
Jerusalem Post
Joel Connelly
Juan Cole
Julia Ioffe/New Republic
Le Diplo
Media Matters
Michael Moore
Middle East Times
MoveOn.org
Nation, The
New American Century
News Trust
NMFA
numbers
Online Journal
Palestine Daily
Palestine News
Paul Krugman - economics
Personal bio info
Portland Indy Media
Progressive Review
Project Vote Smart
Reuters
Sea Shepherd
Slate
Talking Points Memo
the Oatmeal
Tom Paine.com
truthout
War and Piece
Washington Votes
WikiLeaks.ch
ynetnews.com

NwCitizen 1995 - 2007

Early Northwest Citizen

Internet At Its Best

TED

Quiet, Offline or Dead

Bellingham Register
Carl Weimer
David Hackworth
N. Sound Conservancy
No Leaky Buckets
Northwest Review
Orcinus
Post-Oklahoman Confessions
Protect Bellingham Parks
The American Telegraph
The Crisis Papers